Valorization of low-quality recycled concrete aggregates in cement-based systems through carbonation: assessment of engineering performance

IF 2.1 4区 材料科学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, CERAMICS
Burak Dundar, Merve Sonmez Tugluca, Huseyin Ilcan, Oguzhan Sahin, Mustafa Sahmaran
{"title":"Valorization of low-quality recycled concrete aggregates in cement-based systems through carbonation: assessment of engineering performance","authors":"Burak Dundar,&nbsp;Merve Sonmez Tugluca,&nbsp;Huseyin Ilcan,&nbsp;Oguzhan Sahin,&nbsp;Mustafa Sahmaran","doi":"10.1007/s41779-025-01208-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With the continuous rise in construction and demolition waste (CDW) generation and the increasing demand for sustainable construction materials, this study aims to explore the potential of utilizing recycled concrete aggregate (RCA)—the most abundant component of CDW—as a replacement for natural aggregate (NA). Mortar samples incorporating untreated recycled fine aggregate (RFA), natural fine aggregate (NFA), and carbonated RFA (CRFA) were produced to determine whether the mechanical and durability drawbacks of RFA can be mitigated through accelerated carbonation. In this context, the workability, mechanical strength, water absorption capacity, capillary water absorption behavior, freeze–thaw and chloride permeability properties of the mortars were analyzed. The results indicate that the negative impact of RFA on engineering properties can be significantly reduced through accelerated carbonation. Despite all aggregates being in a saturated surface dry state, RFA exhibited the lowest flowability, while NFA had the highest. In strength tests, CRFA-containing mortars achieved performance levels comparable to those with NA. However, RFA mixtures demonstrated considerably higher water absorption and permeability than NA, while CRFA improved these properties. Additionally, RFA mortars experienced greater weight loss during freeze–thaw cycles, but carbonation treatment helped mitigate this deterioration. These findings highlight the potential of accelerated carbonation treatment as an effective method for upgrading RCAs, contributing to more sustainable construction practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":673,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society","volume":"61 5","pages":"1769 - 1784"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41779-025-01208-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41779-025-01208-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CERAMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the continuous rise in construction and demolition waste (CDW) generation and the increasing demand for sustainable construction materials, this study aims to explore the potential of utilizing recycled concrete aggregate (RCA)—the most abundant component of CDW—as a replacement for natural aggregate (NA). Mortar samples incorporating untreated recycled fine aggregate (RFA), natural fine aggregate (NFA), and carbonated RFA (CRFA) were produced to determine whether the mechanical and durability drawbacks of RFA can be mitigated through accelerated carbonation. In this context, the workability, mechanical strength, water absorption capacity, capillary water absorption behavior, freeze–thaw and chloride permeability properties of the mortars were analyzed. The results indicate that the negative impact of RFA on engineering properties can be significantly reduced through accelerated carbonation. Despite all aggregates being in a saturated surface dry state, RFA exhibited the lowest flowability, while NFA had the highest. In strength tests, CRFA-containing mortars achieved performance levels comparable to those with NA. However, RFA mixtures demonstrated considerably higher water absorption and permeability than NA, while CRFA improved these properties. Additionally, RFA mortars experienced greater weight loss during freeze–thaw cycles, but carbonation treatment helped mitigate this deterioration. These findings highlight the potential of accelerated carbonation treatment as an effective method for upgrading RCAs, contributing to more sustainable construction practices.

低质量再生混凝土骨料在水泥基体系中通过碳化的增值:工程性能的评估
随着建筑和拆除废物(CDW)产生的不断增加以及对可持续建筑材料的需求不断增加,本研究旨在探索利用再生混凝土骨料(RCA)作为天然骨料(NA)的替代品的潜力。制作了含有未经处理的再生细骨料(RFA)、天然细骨料(NFA)和碳化细骨料(CRFA)的砂浆样品,以确定通过加速碳化是否可以减轻RFA的机械和耐久性缺陷。在此背景下,分析了砂浆的和易性、机械强度、吸水能力、毛细吸水性能、冻融性能和氯离子渗透性能。结果表明,通过加速碳化可以显著降低RFA对工程性能的负面影响。尽管所有团聚体均处于饱和表面干燥状态,但RFA的流动性最低,而NFA的流动性最高。在强度测试中,含有氯氟烃的迫击炮的性能水平与含有氯氟烃的迫击炮相当。然而,RFA混合物的吸水性和透气性明显高于NA,而CRFA则改善了这些性能。此外,RFA砂浆在冻融循环中经历了更大的重量损失,但碳化处理有助于减轻这种恶化。这些发现强调了加速碳化处理作为升级rca的有效方法的潜力,有助于更可持续的建筑实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society
Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society Materials Science-Materials Chemistry
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Publishes high quality research and technical papers in all areas of ceramic and related materials Spans the broad and growing fields of ceramic technology, material science and bioceramics Chronicles new advances in ceramic materials, manufacturing processes and applications Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society since 1965 Professional language editing service is available through our affiliates Nature Research Editing Service and American Journal Experts at the author''s cost and does not guarantee that the manuscript will be reviewed or accepted
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书