Frontal Sinus Fracture Management: A Single-Center 13-Year Retrospective Analysis.

IF 1.3
Milovan V Dimitrijevic, Aleksandar M Krstic, Goran M Stojkovic, Ana M Dimitrijevic, Petar M Djurkovic, Masa G Petrovic, Bojan M Pavlovic, Sasa Jakovljevic, Nikola R Todorovic
{"title":"Frontal Sinus Fracture Management: A Single-Center 13-Year Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"Milovan V Dimitrijevic, Aleksandar M Krstic, Goran M Stojkovic, Ana M Dimitrijevic, Petar M Djurkovic, Masa G Petrovic, Bojan M Pavlovic, Sasa Jakovljevic, Nikola R Todorovic","doi":"10.1159/000548926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Frontal sinus fractures are complex injuries that require individualized management based on the extent of fracture, involvement of the nasofrontal duct (NFD), and the presence of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. Optimal treatment remains controversial, with evolving trends toward selective conservative approaches. This study aimed to evaluate treatment outcomes over a 13-year period using a standardized management algorithm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted of 201 patients treated for frontal sinus fractures at a tertiary academic center between 2007 and 2020. Fractures were classified according to anterior or posterior wall involvement, and management strategies included conservative observation, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and cranialization. Surgical intervention was indicated based on NFD obstruction, posterior wall involvement, or CSF leakage. Clinical and demographic data, surgical techniques, and complications were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 201 patients, 189 underwent surgical treatment. ORIF was performed in 76.2% of cases, and cranialization was required in 17%. The complication rate among surgically treated patients was 10.6%, primarily due to infection and delayed healing, compared to 25% in the conservatively managed group. The majority of fractures resulted from high-energy trauma, particularly traffic accidents, and predominantly affected young male patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An individualized, algorithm-guided approach to frontal sinus fracture management leads to favorable outcomes and lower complication rates. Surgical intervention is particularly beneficial in cases with NFD obstruction or CSF leakage. These findings support the role of structured, multidisciplinary decision-making in optimizing treatment strategies for complex craniofacial trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":520736,"journal":{"name":"ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties","volume":" ","pages":"208-217"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Frontal sinus fractures are complex injuries that require individualized management based on the extent of fracture, involvement of the nasofrontal duct (NFD), and the presence of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. Optimal treatment remains controversial, with evolving trends toward selective conservative approaches. This study aimed to evaluate treatment outcomes over a 13-year period using a standardized management algorithm.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 201 patients treated for frontal sinus fractures at a tertiary academic center between 2007 and 2020. Fractures were classified according to anterior or posterior wall involvement, and management strategies included conservative observation, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and cranialization. Surgical intervention was indicated based on NFD obstruction, posterior wall involvement, or CSF leakage. Clinical and demographic data, surgical techniques, and complications were analyzed.

Results: Out of 201 patients, 189 underwent surgical treatment. ORIF was performed in 76.2% of cases, and cranialization was required in 17%. The complication rate among surgically treated patients was 10.6%, primarily due to infection and delayed healing, compared to 25% in the conservatively managed group. The majority of fractures resulted from high-energy trauma, particularly traffic accidents, and predominantly affected young male patients.

Conclusion: An individualized, algorithm-guided approach to frontal sinus fracture management leads to favorable outcomes and lower complication rates. Surgical intervention is particularly beneficial in cases with NFD obstruction or CSF leakage. These findings support the role of structured, multidisciplinary decision-making in optimizing treatment strategies for complex craniofacial trauma.

额窦骨折治疗:单中心13年回顾性分析。
额窦骨折是一种复杂的损伤,需要根据骨折的程度、是否累及鼻额管(NFD)和是否存在脑脊液(CSF)泄漏进行个体化治疗。最佳治疗仍有争议,有选择性保守治疗的发展趋势。本研究旨在使用标准化管理算法评估13年期间的治疗结果。方法:回顾性分析2007年至2020年在某三级学术中心治疗额窦骨折的201例患者。根据前后壁受累程度对骨折进行分类,治疗策略包括保守观察、切开复位内固定(ORIF)和开颅术。手术干预是基于NFD阻塞,后壁受累,或脑脊液渗漏。分析临床和人口统计资料、手术技术和并发症。结果:201例患者中,189例接受手术治疗。76.2%的病例行ORIF手术,17%的病例需要开颅。手术治疗患者的并发症发生率为10.6%,主要是由于感染和延迟愈合,而保守治疗组的并发症发生率为25%。大多数骨折是由高能创伤引起的,尤其是交通事故,主要影响年轻男性患者。结论:个体化、算法引导的额窦骨折治疗方法效果良好,并发症发生率较低。手术干预对NFD梗阻或脑脊液渗漏的病例特别有益。这些发现支持结构化、多学科决策在优化复杂颅面创伤治疗策略中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书