A randomized controlled pilot trial of low and high arousal resilience interventions for depressive symptoms.

IF 3.3
Elissa S Epel, Brian P Don, Stefanie E Mayer, Robin Blades, Ashley E Mason, Elena Fromer, Julia F O'Bryan, Rebecca Dileo, Joanna Y Guan, Samantha J Schilf, Sylvia S Cheng, Aric A Prather, Wendy Berry Mendes
{"title":"A randomized controlled pilot trial of low and high arousal resilience interventions for depressive symptoms.","authors":"Elissa S Epel, Brian P Don, Stefanie E Mayer, Robin Blades, Ashley E Mason, Elena Fromer, Julia F O'Bryan, Rebecca Dileo, Joanna Y Guan, Samantha J Schilf, Sylvia S Cheng, Aric A Prather, Wendy Berry Mendes","doi":"10.1093/abm/kaaf081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To cope with chronic stress, which can contribute to depression, humans often pursue arousal-reducing activities. Yet, hormetic stressors (intermittent, acute stressors) might also reduce chronic stress.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We compared the effects of arousal-reducing and arousal-enhancing interventions on depressive symptoms and perceived stress.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Female adults (N = 141; predominantly White, 63%, and Asian, 34%) reporting high perceived stress were randomized to 1 of 4 three-week stress resilience interventions in 2019-2020. Low arousal conditions included mindfulness meditation or slow breathing with warm showers (Control). Hormetic stress conditions included fast paced breathing with cold showers (the Wim Hof Method; WHM) or high-intensity interval training. We assessed depressive symptoms and perceived stress at baseline, postintervention, and 3 months later, and cortisol reactivity to a lab stressor.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At postintervention, all 4 groups had decreases in depressive symptoms (15.93% reduction, r = .76, P < .001) and perceived stress (9.70% reduction, r = .48, P < .001), with no group differences. \"As treated\" analysis showed the WHM group had better maintenance of reduced depression 3 months later (r = .17, P < .01). The WHM group had greater increases in daily positive affect across days (r = .16, P ≤ .05) and at postintervention (r = .17, P < .015) compared to the control group. Groups were similar in cortisol reactivity pre- and postintervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All groups experienced reduced stress and depressive symptoms and did not differ from each other after 3 weeks. After 3 months, a post hoc analysis of adherent subjects showed the WHM group had more sustained improvements in depression and positive affect, a finding that needs replication with larger and more diverse samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":520558,"journal":{"name":"Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaaf081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To cope with chronic stress, which can contribute to depression, humans often pursue arousal-reducing activities. Yet, hormetic stressors (intermittent, acute stressors) might also reduce chronic stress.

Purpose: We compared the effects of arousal-reducing and arousal-enhancing interventions on depressive symptoms and perceived stress.

Methods: Female adults (N = 141; predominantly White, 63%, and Asian, 34%) reporting high perceived stress were randomized to 1 of 4 three-week stress resilience interventions in 2019-2020. Low arousal conditions included mindfulness meditation or slow breathing with warm showers (Control). Hormetic stress conditions included fast paced breathing with cold showers (the Wim Hof Method; WHM) or high-intensity interval training. We assessed depressive symptoms and perceived stress at baseline, postintervention, and 3 months later, and cortisol reactivity to a lab stressor.

Results: At postintervention, all 4 groups had decreases in depressive symptoms (15.93% reduction, r = .76, P < .001) and perceived stress (9.70% reduction, r = .48, P < .001), with no group differences. "As treated" analysis showed the WHM group had better maintenance of reduced depression 3 months later (r = .17, P < .01). The WHM group had greater increases in daily positive affect across days (r = .16, P ≤ .05) and at postintervention (r = .17, P < .015) compared to the control group. Groups were similar in cortisol reactivity pre- and postintervention.

Conclusions: All groups experienced reduced stress and depressive symptoms and did not differ from each other after 3 weeks. After 3 months, a post hoc analysis of adherent subjects showed the WHM group had more sustained improvements in depression and positive affect, a finding that needs replication with larger and more diverse samples.

低唤醒和高唤醒弹性干预抑郁症状的随机对照试验。
背景:为了应对可能导致抑郁的慢性压力,人类经常追求减少觉醒的活动。然而,激效应激源(间歇性、急性应激源)也可能减少慢性应激。目的:比较唤醒增强干预和减少唤醒干预对抑郁症状和感知压力的影响。方法:在2019-2020年期间,报告高感知压力的成年女性(N = 141,主要是白人(63%)和亚洲人(34%)被随机分配到4个为期三周的压力恢复干预措施中的一个。低唤醒条件包括正念冥想或缓慢呼吸和温水淋浴(对照组)。热应激条件包括冷水浴的快节奏呼吸(威姆霍夫方法;WHM)或高强度间歇训练。我们在基线、干预后和3个月后评估抑郁症状和感知压力,以及皮质醇对实验室压力源的反应。结果:干预后,4组患者抑郁症状均减轻(15.93%,r =。结论:3周后,各组患者的压力和抑郁症状均有所减轻,且差异无统计学意义。3个月后,对坚持治疗的受试者进行的事后分析显示,WHM组在抑郁和积极情绪方面有更持久的改善,这一发现需要在更大、更多样化的样本中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书