Association Between Trigger Surprisal and Tension-Type Headache Attacks.

Medical research archives Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.18103/mra.v13i9.6969
Dana P Turner, Twinkle Patel, Timothy T Houle
{"title":"Association Between Trigger Surprisal and Tension-Type Headache Attacks.","authors":"Dana P Turner, Twinkle Patel, Timothy T Houle","doi":"10.18103/mra.v13i9.6969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The causes of individual headache attacks are commonly sought, yet the multiple potential influences make this task difficult. Information theory provides a framework for addressing this challenge by quantifying how unexpected an exposure is through <i>surprisal</i>. Prior research has shown that higher surprisal scores predict migraine onset, but the extent to which this relationship generalizes to tension-type headache remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to determine whether surprisal is associated with incident tension-type headache attacks among individuals with episodic migraine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This secondary analysis proceeded from a prospective daily diary study in which 109 participants with migraine recorded potential triggers, headache activity, and symptoms twice daily for up to 28 days. Surprisal values were computed from person-specific probability distributions of diary responses, aggregated to yield average surprisal scores per diary entry. Associations between current surprisal and the onset of headache attacks within 12- and 24-hour intervals were evaluated. Analyses were conducted for all headaches combined and separately for migraine-only and tension-type headache-only attack sets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Headache attacks occurred in 1,345 of 4,530 (29.7%) of 12-hour and 2,122 of 4,947 (42.9%) of 24-hour windows. Stratified analyses showed a strong association for migraine attacks, OR: 2.18 (95%CI: 1.15 - 4.14) at 12 hours and OR: 2.88 (95%CI: 1.77 - 4.69) at 24 hours. In contrast, associations with tension-type headache were weak and nonsignificant, OR: 1.01 (95%CI: 0.45 - 2.23) at 12 hours and OR: 1.40 (95%CI: 0.69 -2.86) at 24 hours. Exploratory nonlinear and contextual analyses within the tension-type headache subset revealed no consistent gradients or effect modification by prior-day surprisal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surprisal was associated with migraine but not tension-type headache attacks in this cohort. These findings suggest that migraine may be more sensitive to contextual unpredictability in the environment than tension-type headache. Future research should examine surprisal in populations with primary tension-type headache diagnoses to clarify whether the absence of association reflects true diagnostic differences or misclassification of attacks.</p>","PeriodicalId":94137,"journal":{"name":"Medical research archives","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12646078/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical research archives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v13i9.6969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The causes of individual headache attacks are commonly sought, yet the multiple potential influences make this task difficult. Information theory provides a framework for addressing this challenge by quantifying how unexpected an exposure is through surprisal. Prior research has shown that higher surprisal scores predict migraine onset, but the extent to which this relationship generalizes to tension-type headache remains unknown.

Aims: This study aimed to determine whether surprisal is associated with incident tension-type headache attacks among individuals with episodic migraine.

Methods: This secondary analysis proceeded from a prospective daily diary study in which 109 participants with migraine recorded potential triggers, headache activity, and symptoms twice daily for up to 28 days. Surprisal values were computed from person-specific probability distributions of diary responses, aggregated to yield average surprisal scores per diary entry. Associations between current surprisal and the onset of headache attacks within 12- and 24-hour intervals were evaluated. Analyses were conducted for all headaches combined and separately for migraine-only and tension-type headache-only attack sets.

Results: Headache attacks occurred in 1,345 of 4,530 (29.7%) of 12-hour and 2,122 of 4,947 (42.9%) of 24-hour windows. Stratified analyses showed a strong association for migraine attacks, OR: 2.18 (95%CI: 1.15 - 4.14) at 12 hours and OR: 2.88 (95%CI: 1.77 - 4.69) at 24 hours. In contrast, associations with tension-type headache were weak and nonsignificant, OR: 1.01 (95%CI: 0.45 - 2.23) at 12 hours and OR: 1.40 (95%CI: 0.69 -2.86) at 24 hours. Exploratory nonlinear and contextual analyses within the tension-type headache subset revealed no consistent gradients or effect modification by prior-day surprisal.

Conclusions: Surprisal was associated with migraine but not tension-type headache attacks in this cohort. These findings suggest that migraine may be more sensitive to contextual unpredictability in the environment than tension-type headache. Future research should examine surprisal in populations with primary tension-type headache diagnoses to clarify whether the absence of association reflects true diagnostic differences or misclassification of attacks.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

触发性惊讶和紧张性头痛发作之间的关系。
背景:个体头痛发作的原因通常被寻找,然而多种潜在的影响使这项任务变得困难。信息理论提供了一个框架,通过量化暴露的意外程度来应对这一挑战。先前的研究表明,较高的惊喜分数可以预测偏头痛的发作,但这种关系在多大程度上推广到紧张性头痛仍然未知。目的:本研究旨在确定在发作性偏头痛患者中,惊讶是否与紧张性头痛发作有关。方法:这项二级分析来自一项前瞻性的每日日记研究,其中109名偏头痛患者记录了潜在的触发因素、头痛活动和症状,每天两次,持续28天。从日记反应的个人特定概率分布计算惊奇值,汇总得出每个日记条目的平均惊奇值。评估了当前突然发作与间隔12小时和24小时的头痛发作之间的关系。对所有合并头痛和单独偏头痛型和紧张性头痛发作组进行分析。结果:在12小时时段的4,530例患者中,有1,345例(29.7%)发生头痛发作;在24小时时段的4,947例患者中,有2,122例(42.9%)发生头痛发作。分层分析显示与偏头痛发作有很强的相关性,12小时时OR: 2.18 (95%CI: 1.15 - 4.14), 24小时时OR: 2.88 (95%CI: 1.77 - 4.69)。相比之下,与紧张性头痛的相关性较弱且不显著,12小时时OR: 1.01 (95%CI: 0.45 - 2.23), 24小时时OR: 1.40 (95%CI: 0.69 -2.86)。探索性非线性和上下文分析在紧张性头痛子集显示没有一致的梯度或效果修改前一天的惊喜。结论:在这个队列中,惊讶与偏头痛有关,但与紧张性头痛发作无关。这些发现表明,偏头痛可能比紧张性头痛对环境的不可预测性更敏感。未来的研究应该在原发性紧张性头痛的人群中进行调查,以澄清相关性的缺失是否反映了真正的诊断差异,还是对发作的错误分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书