Integrating machine learning into the in silico clinical trial pipeline

IF 2.6 4区 数学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Mathematical Biosciences Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-25 DOI:10.1016/j.mbs.2025.109583
Rebecca A. Bekker , Renee Brady-Nicholls , Lisette de Pillis , Jana L. Gevertz , Harsh Vardhan Jain
{"title":"Integrating machine learning into the in silico clinical trial pipeline","authors":"Rebecca A. Bekker ,&nbsp;Renee Brady-Nicholls ,&nbsp;Lisette de Pillis ,&nbsp;Jana L. Gevertz ,&nbsp;Harsh Vardhan Jain","doi":"10.1016/j.mbs.2025.109583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>In silico</em> clinical trials offer a powerful tool for overcoming several limitations of traditional clinical trials. Conventional trials are time- and resource-intensive, typically designed to assess average effects across a population while being restricted to studying the impact of a fixed treatment protocol. In contrast, <em>in silico</em> trials are cost-effective, flexible in their design, and able to explore heterogeneity in treatment response. These trials generally rely on expert-developed and data-calibrated mechanistic mathematical models and the identification of model parameterizations that satisfy biological or clinical constraints. With the growing availability of multi-scale and high-resolution clinical data, it is the opportune time to thoughtfully consider how machine learning (ML) methods can enhance the feasibility, interpretability, and reliability of these <em>in silico</em> trials. In this perspective piece, we explore both the opportunities and the challenges of introducing ML tools at various stages of this process, from biomarker identification to interpreting the results of the trial. We argue that in the hands of an expert modeler, the thoughtful application of ML tools can result in more accurate and informative <em>in silico</em> clinical trials that may potentially accelerate drug development and find the right drug/protocol for the right patient.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51119,"journal":{"name":"Mathematical Biosciences","volume":"391 ","pages":"Article 109583"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematical Biosciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025556425002093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In silico clinical trials offer a powerful tool for overcoming several limitations of traditional clinical trials. Conventional trials are time- and resource-intensive, typically designed to assess average effects across a population while being restricted to studying the impact of a fixed treatment protocol. In contrast, in silico trials are cost-effective, flexible in their design, and able to explore heterogeneity in treatment response. These trials generally rely on expert-developed and data-calibrated mechanistic mathematical models and the identification of model parameterizations that satisfy biological or clinical constraints. With the growing availability of multi-scale and high-resolution clinical data, it is the opportune time to thoughtfully consider how machine learning (ML) methods can enhance the feasibility, interpretability, and reliability of these in silico trials. In this perspective piece, we explore both the opportunities and the challenges of introducing ML tools at various stages of this process, from biomarker identification to interpreting the results of the trial. We argue that in the hands of an expert modeler, the thoughtful application of ML tools can result in more accurate and informative in silico clinical trials that may potentially accelerate drug development and find the right drug/protocol for the right patient.
将机器学习集成到计算机临床试验管道中。
计算机临床试验为克服传统临床试验的一些局限性提供了强有力的工具。传统的试验需要耗费大量的时间和资源,通常被设计用来评估整个人群的平均效果,而仅限于研究固定治疗方案的影响。相比之下,计算机试验具有成本效益,设计灵活,并且能够探索治疗反应的异质性。这些试验通常依赖于专家开发和数据校准的机械数学模型,以及满足生物学或临床限制的模型参数化的识别。随着越来越多的多尺度和高分辨率临床数据的可用性,现在是考虑机器学习(ML)方法如何增强这些计算机试验的可行性、可解释性和可靠性的时机。在这篇透视文章中,我们探讨了在这一过程的各个阶段引入机器学习工具的机遇和挑战,从生物标志物识别到解释试验结果。我们认为,在专家建模者的手中,机器学习工具的周到应用可以导致更准确和信息丰富的计算机临床试验,这可能会加速药物开发,并为合适的患者找到合适的药物/方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mathematical Biosciences
Mathematical Biosciences 生物-生物学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.30%
发文量
67
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Mathematical Biosciences publishes work providing new concepts or new understanding of biological systems using mathematical models, or methodological articles likely to find application to multiple biological systems. Papers are expected to present a major research finding of broad significance for the biological sciences, or mathematical biology. Mathematical Biosciences welcomes original research articles, letters, reviews and perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书