{"title":"Correlation between F-18 FDG PET/CT-derived metabolic parameters and PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer patients","authors":"S. Kesim, F. Ozulker, G. Gul Gecmen, N. Turan","doi":"10.1016/j.remnie.2025.500258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression serves as a critical biomarker for selecting patients eligible for treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Herein, we investigated the association between PD-L1 expression and various FDG PET/CT–derived metabolic parameters in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This retrospective study included 81 NSCLC patients who underwent pre-treatment F-18 FDG PET/CT imaging and histopathological evaluation of PD-L1 expression. PD-L1 tumour proportion score (TPS) was determined using the SP263 immunohistochemical assay. PD-L1 positivity was defined as TPS ≥ 1%. Quantitative PET/CT parameters—SUVmax, SUVmean, SULpeak, SULmax, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and heterogeneity indices (coefficient of variation [COV] and SUV-based heterogeneity index [HI])—were analyzed in relation to PD-L1 TPS.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>PD-L1 positivity was identified in 30 patients (37%). Although SUVmax, SUVmean, SULpeak, and SULmax values tended to be higher in PD-L1–positive patients, these differences were not statistically significant. Conversely, MTV and TLG were higher in the PD-L1–negative group. Among all parameters, HI was significantly elevated in the PD-L1–positive group (<em>P</em> = .031), and remained significant across PD-L1 expression strata (<em>P</em> = .037). In metastatic patients, HI and COV showed significant positive correlation with PD-L1 expression (r = 0.34 and 0.33, respectively). ROC analysis identified a HI cut-off of 1.59 to predict PD-L1 positivity with 90% sensitivity and 50% specificity (AUC = 0.674).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Tumor heterogeneity indices, particularly HI and COV derived from FDG PET/CT, demonstrated stronger predictive value for PD-L1 expression than conventional metabolic parameters. These findings suggest that metabolic heterogeneity may serve as a useful noninvasive imaging biomarker for guiding immunotherapy in NSCLC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94197,"journal":{"name":"Revista espanola de medicina nuclear e imagen molecular","volume":"45 4","pages":"Article 500258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista espanola de medicina nuclear e imagen molecular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2253808925001636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression serves as a critical biomarker for selecting patients eligible for treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Herein, we investigated the association between PD-L1 expression and various FDG PET/CT–derived metabolic parameters in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Materials and methods
This retrospective study included 81 NSCLC patients who underwent pre-treatment F-18 FDG PET/CT imaging and histopathological evaluation of PD-L1 expression. PD-L1 tumour proportion score (TPS) was determined using the SP263 immunohistochemical assay. PD-L1 positivity was defined as TPS ≥ 1%. Quantitative PET/CT parameters—SUVmax, SUVmean, SULpeak, SULmax, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and heterogeneity indices (coefficient of variation [COV] and SUV-based heterogeneity index [HI])—were analyzed in relation to PD-L1 TPS.
Results
PD-L1 positivity was identified in 30 patients (37%). Although SUVmax, SUVmean, SULpeak, and SULmax values tended to be higher in PD-L1–positive patients, these differences were not statistically significant. Conversely, MTV and TLG were higher in the PD-L1–negative group. Among all parameters, HI was significantly elevated in the PD-L1–positive group (P = .031), and remained significant across PD-L1 expression strata (P = .037). In metastatic patients, HI and COV showed significant positive correlation with PD-L1 expression (r = 0.34 and 0.33, respectively). ROC analysis identified a HI cut-off of 1.59 to predict PD-L1 positivity with 90% sensitivity and 50% specificity (AUC = 0.674).
Conclusions
Tumor heterogeneity indices, particularly HI and COV derived from FDG PET/CT, demonstrated stronger predictive value for PD-L1 expression than conventional metabolic parameters. These findings suggest that metabolic heterogeneity may serve as a useful noninvasive imaging biomarker for guiding immunotherapy in NSCLC.