Examining the influence of lifestyle variables on the accuracy of skeletal age estimation via the pubic symphysis

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Journal of forensic sciences Pub Date : 2026-03-08 Epub Date: 2025-11-28 DOI:10.1111/1556-4029.70240
Natalie Moss MSc, Elizabeth Craig-Atkins PhD
{"title":"Examining the influence of lifestyle variables on the accuracy of skeletal age estimation via the pubic symphysis","authors":"Natalie Moss MSc,&nbsp;Elizabeth Craig-Atkins PhD","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.70240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigated links between skeletal age estimation error and lifestyle variables to better elucidate sources of interpersonal variability in the rates of skeletal aging. Skeletal age for 180 individuals from the New Mexico Decedent Image Database was estimated by applying the Suchey–Brooks method and transition analysis to 3D models of the pubic symphysis, and age estimates were compared to known age-at-death. Age estimation bias and accuracy for both methods were evaluated first with respect to single lifestyle variables, then random forest modeling was used to test variability with respect to all lifestyle variables. Age estimation bias was shown to be significantly different with respect to sex when applying transition analysis, but not when applying Suchey–Brooks, and males tended to be underaged relative to females of the same age. While no statistically significant differences in bias existed for either method between BMI categories, random forest modeling indicated that body size exerts a limited but variable influence on skeletal aging. Additional variables were highlighted as potentially influential to skeletal aging by random forests, such as socioeconomic status, but ultimately, model performance and variable importance plots demonstrated that these influences were slight and nonuniform. These data suggest that including considerations of lifestyle variables in skeletal aging methods would not improve aging estimates.</p>","PeriodicalId":15743,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic sciences","volume":"71 2","pages":"656-667"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12967697/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1556-4029.70240","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated links between skeletal age estimation error and lifestyle variables to better elucidate sources of interpersonal variability in the rates of skeletal aging. Skeletal age for 180 individuals from the New Mexico Decedent Image Database was estimated by applying the Suchey–Brooks method and transition analysis to 3D models of the pubic symphysis, and age estimates were compared to known age-at-death. Age estimation bias and accuracy for both methods were evaluated first with respect to single lifestyle variables, then random forest modeling was used to test variability with respect to all lifestyle variables. Age estimation bias was shown to be significantly different with respect to sex when applying transition analysis, but not when applying Suchey–Brooks, and males tended to be underaged relative to females of the same age. While no statistically significant differences in bias existed for either method between BMI categories, random forest modeling indicated that body size exerts a limited but variable influence on skeletal aging. Additional variables were highlighted as potentially influential to skeletal aging by random forests, such as socioeconomic status, but ultimately, model performance and variable importance plots demonstrated that these influences were slight and nonuniform. These data suggest that including considerations of lifestyle variables in skeletal aging methods would not improve aging estimates.

Abstract Image

通过耻骨联合检查生活方式变量对骨骼年龄估计准确性的影响。
本研究调查了骨骼年龄估计误差和生活方式变量之间的联系,以更好地阐明骨骼衰老率的人际变异性的来源。利用Suchey-Brooks方法和对耻骨联合三维模型的过渡分析,对来自新墨西哥死者图像数据库的180个人的骨骼年龄进行了估计,并将估计的年龄与已知的死亡年龄进行了比较。首先针对单一生活方式变量评估两种方法的年龄估计偏差和准确性,然后使用随机森林模型来测试所有生活方式变量的变异性。年龄估计偏倚在性别上存在显著差异,但在Suchey-Brooks分析中无显著差异,且男性相对于相同年龄的女性倾向于年龄偏小。虽然两种方法在BMI类别之间的偏倚没有统计学上的显著差异,但随机森林模型表明,体型对骨骼衰老的影响有限但可变。随机森林强调了其他变量对骨骼老化的潜在影响,如社会经济地位,但最终,模型性能和变量重要性图表明,这些影响是轻微的和不均匀的。这些数据表明,在骨骼老化方法中考虑生活方式变量并不能改善对衰老的估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of forensic sciences
Journal of forensic sciences 医学-医学:法
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
215
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Forensic Sciences (JFS) is the official publication of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS). It is devoted to the publication of original investigations, observations, scholarly inquiries and reviews in various branches of the forensic sciences. These include anthropology, criminalistics, digital and multimedia sciences, engineering and applied sciences, pathology/biology, psychiatry and behavioral science, jurisprudence, odontology, questioned documents, and toxicology. Similar submissions dealing with forensic aspects of other sciences and the social sciences are also accepted, as are submissions dealing with scientifically sound emerging science disciplines. The content and/or views expressed in the JFS are not necessarily those of the AAFS, the JFS Editorial Board, the organizations with which authors are affiliated, or the publisher of JFS. All manuscript submissions are double-blind peer-reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书