Post-learning stress after a heartbeat perception training facilitates interoceptive accuracy in the heartbeat counting task, but not in the heartbeat discrimination task

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Biological Psychology Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2025.109172
R. Müller , C. Vögele , I. Van Diest , A. Schulz
{"title":"Post-learning stress after a heartbeat perception training facilitates interoceptive accuracy in the heartbeat counting task, but not in the heartbeat discrimination task","authors":"R. Müller ,&nbsp;C. Vögele ,&nbsp;I. Van Diest ,&nbsp;A. Schulz","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsycho.2025.109172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Interoceptive accuracy (IAc), assessed using the heartbeat counting task (HCT), increased after a heartbeat perception training (HBPT) and a post-learning stressor (i.e., the socially-evaluated cold pressor test; SECPT), suggesting facilitation of interoceptive perceptual learning after stress. Here we investigated whether this effect is due to undergoing HBPT or repeatedly performing the HCT, and if this effect is also observable in the heartbeat discrimination task (HDT). Healthy adults (N = 96, 80 women; 18 – 41 years; university students and staff, local community), were randomly assigned to one of four groups, two of which received HBPT, either followed by SECPT or a control condition (HBPT+stress / HBPT-stress, respectively). The other two groups completed an exteroceptive perceptual learning paradigm (visual perception task; VPT), followed by the SECPT or the control condition (VPT+stress / VPT-stress). We assessed IAc using the HCT and the HDT before (T1), 30 min (T2) and 24 h after the SECPT / control intervention (T3). The SECPT induced increases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, salivary cortisol, as well as of self-reported stress and pain. IAc in the HCT increased from T1 to T2 and to T3 in the HBPT+stress group only, whereas no effect was observed for IAc based on the HDT. Regression analyses indicated that lower cortisol responsiveness to the SECPT was associated with a larger increase in HCT based IAc over the 24 h interval (T2 to T3), suggesting that stronger cortisol responses inhibits overnight consolidation in interoceptive perceptual learning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55372,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychology","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 109172"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301051125001905","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interoceptive accuracy (IAc), assessed using the heartbeat counting task (HCT), increased after a heartbeat perception training (HBPT) and a post-learning stressor (i.e., the socially-evaluated cold pressor test; SECPT), suggesting facilitation of interoceptive perceptual learning after stress. Here we investigated whether this effect is due to undergoing HBPT or repeatedly performing the HCT, and if this effect is also observable in the heartbeat discrimination task (HDT). Healthy adults (N = 96, 80 women; 18 – 41 years; university students and staff, local community), were randomly assigned to one of four groups, two of which received HBPT, either followed by SECPT or a control condition (HBPT+stress / HBPT-stress, respectively). The other two groups completed an exteroceptive perceptual learning paradigm (visual perception task; VPT), followed by the SECPT or the control condition (VPT+stress / VPT-stress). We assessed IAc using the HCT and the HDT before (T1), 30 min (T2) and 24 h after the SECPT / control intervention (T3). The SECPT induced increases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, salivary cortisol, as well as of self-reported stress and pain. IAc in the HCT increased from T1 to T2 and to T3 in the HBPT+stress group only, whereas no effect was observed for IAc based on the HDT. Regression analyses indicated that lower cortisol responsiveness to the SECPT was associated with a larger increase in HCT based IAc over the 24 h interval (T2 to T3), suggesting that stronger cortisol responses inhibits overnight consolidation in interoceptive perceptual learning.
心跳知觉训练后的学习后压力有助于心跳计数任务的内感受准确性,但不利于心跳辨别任务的内感受准确性。
使用心跳计数任务(HCT)评估的内感受准确性(IAc)在心跳感知训练(HBPT)和学习后应激源(即社会评价冷压测试;SECPT)后增加,表明应激后内感受知觉学习的促进。在这里,我们研究了这种影响是由于接受HBPT还是重复执行HCT,以及这种影响是否在心跳辨别任务(HDT)中也可以观察到。健康成人(N = 96, 80名女性;18 - 41岁;大学学生和工作人员,当地社区)随机分为四组,其中两组接受HBPT,然后接受SECPT或对照组(HBPT+应激/ HBPT-应激)。另外两组先完成外感受性知觉学习范式(视觉知觉任务;VPT),然后再完成外感受性知觉学习范式或对照条件(VPT+应激/ VPT-应激)。我们在SECPT /对照干预前(T1)、30min (T2)和24h后(T3)使用HCT和HDT评估IAc。SECPT诱导收缩压和舒张压、心率、唾液皮质醇以及自我报告的压力和疼痛的增加。仅在HBPT+应激组中,HCT中的IAc从T1增加到T2,并增加到T3,而基于HDT的IAc未观察到任何影响。回归分析表明,在24小时间隔(T2至T3)内,较低的皮质醇对SECPT的反应与基于HCT的IAc的较大增加相关,这表明较强的皮质醇反应抑制了隔夜内感受性知觉学习的巩固。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Psychology
Biological Psychology 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
146
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Biological Psychology publishes original scientific papers on the biological aspects of psychological states and processes. Biological aspects include electrophysiology and biochemical assessments during psychological experiments as well as biologically induced changes in psychological function. Psychological investigations based on biological theories are also of interest. All aspects of psychological functioning, including psychopathology, are germane. The Journal concentrates on work with human subjects, but may consider work with animal subjects if conceptually related to issues in human biological psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书