Initial characteristics to predict the duration of multidisciplinary pain treatment in chronic pain patients: a cross-sectional study.

IF 0.9 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Fukushima Journal of Medical Science Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-27 DOI:10.5387/fms.25-00031
Naoto Takahashi, Shoji Yabuki
{"title":"Initial characteristics to predict the duration of multidisciplinary pain treatment in chronic pain patients: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Naoto Takahashi, Shoji Yabuki","doi":"10.5387/fms.25-00031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractChronic pain patients can achieve substantial improvement within six months, but some require prolonged care. This study aimed to explore differences in baseline characteristics and questionnaire responses between patients who showed significant improvement within six months (completion group) and those requiring treatment beyond six months (continuation group). A cross-sectional study was conducted among 131 patients. Patients were classified into completion group (n = 97) or continuation group (n = 34). Baseline data included demographic information (sex, age), ICD-11J classification, average pain intensity using the numeric rating scale (NRS) and scores from the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Pain Disability Assessment Scale (PDAS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D), and Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS). There were no significant differences in age, sex, or ICD-11J classification between the groups. However, the continuation group exhibited significantly higher baseline scores for average pain intensity, PDAS, and HADS depression than the completion group. Patients with higher baseline pain intensity, greater functional impairment, and more severe depressive symptoms were more likely to require extended multidisciplinary treatment. Early identification of these risk factors is critical for optimizing treatment planning and improving outcomes in chronic pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":44831,"journal":{"name":"Fukushima Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":"199-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fukushima Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5387/fms.25-00031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractChronic pain patients can achieve substantial improvement within six months, but some require prolonged care. This study aimed to explore differences in baseline characteristics and questionnaire responses between patients who showed significant improvement within six months (completion group) and those requiring treatment beyond six months (continuation group). A cross-sectional study was conducted among 131 patients. Patients were classified into completion group (n = 97) or continuation group (n = 34). Baseline data included demographic information (sex, age), ICD-11J classification, average pain intensity using the numeric rating scale (NRS) and scores from the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Pain Disability Assessment Scale (PDAS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D), and Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS). There were no significant differences in age, sex, or ICD-11J classification between the groups. However, the continuation group exhibited significantly higher baseline scores for average pain intensity, PDAS, and HADS depression than the completion group. Patients with higher baseline pain intensity, greater functional impairment, and more severe depressive symptoms were more likely to require extended multidisciplinary treatment. Early identification of these risk factors is critical for optimizing treatment planning and improving outcomes in chronic pain management.

预测慢性疼痛患者多学科疼痛治疗持续时间的初始特征:一项横断面研究。
慢性疼痛患者可在6个月内获得明显改善,但有些患者需要长期护理。本研究旨在探讨6个月内表现出显著改善的患者(完成组)和6个月以上需要治疗的患者(继续组)在基线特征和问卷回答方面的差异。对131例患者进行了横断面研究。患者分为完成组(n = 97)和继续组(n = 34)。基线数据包括人口统计学信息(性别、年龄)、ICD-11J分类、采用数字评定量表(NRS)的平均疼痛强度和简短疼痛量表(BPI)、疼痛灾难量表(PCS)、疼痛残疾评定量表(PDAS)、医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)、疼痛自我效能问卷(PSEQ)、EuroQol五维度问卷(EQ-5D)和雅典失眠量表(AIS)的得分。两组之间在年龄、性别或ICD-11J分类上无显著差异。然而,继续组在平均疼痛强度、PDAS和HADS抑郁方面的基线得分明显高于完成组。基线疼痛强度较高、功能损害更严重、抑郁症状更严重的患者更有可能需要延长多学科治疗。早期识别这些危险因素对于优化治疗计划和改善慢性疼痛管理的结果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fukushima Journal of Medical Science
Fukushima Journal of Medical Science MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书