Development of a controlled-release tofacitinib formulation using acid-sensitive pore-forming components for an osmotic drug delivery system

IF 5.1 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Jin Ah Lee , Yun Jung Lee , Jeong A Seong , Myung Kwan Chun , Kwon Yeon Weon
{"title":"Development of a controlled-release tofacitinib formulation using acid-sensitive pore-forming components for an osmotic drug delivery system","authors":"Jin Ah Lee ,&nbsp;Yun Jung Lee ,&nbsp;Jeong A Seong ,&nbsp;Myung Kwan Chun ,&nbsp;Kwon Yeon Weon","doi":"10.1016/j.ejps.2025.107389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Acid-sensitive ingredient porosity osmotic drug delivery systems (AID) are a simplified and scalable alternative to conventional ODDS. In the current study, the tofacitinib-loaded AID formulation was optimized using an I-optimal mixture design. The three coating excipients examined as independent variables were cellulose acetate (X₁; 25.8–43.8 %), sodium bicarbonate (X₂; 20.0–30.0 %), and hydroxypropyl cellulose (X₃; 26.3–46.3 %). Response variables included cumulative drug release at 2 h (Y₁), 4 h (Y₂), and 8 h (Y₃), as well as the percentage of residual drug after 8 h (Y₄), which were analyzed using a quadratic model within the I-optimal framework. The coefficient of determination (R²) values for Y₁, Y₂, Y₃, and Y₄ were 0.79, 0.74, 0.55, and 0.48, respectively. The optimized AID exhibited zero-order drug release kinetics (R² = 0.9931), with a release rate constant (K₀) of 0.20 h⁻¹, indicating a consistent and controlled release profile throughout the evaluation period. Pharmacokinetic studies indicated no significant lag time for the AID, while Xeljanz® XR 11 mg exhibited an initial lag time of approximately 0.64 h, consistent with the characteristics of conventional ODDS technologies. Maximum plasma concentrations (C<sub>max</sub>) were 75.7 ± 40.8 ng/mL for Xeljanz® XR 11 mg and 79.4 ± 37.1 ng/mL for AID. The areas under the plasma concentration-time curve were 610.0 ± 187.5 ng/mL for Xeljanz® XR 11 mg and 586.1 ± 210.5 ng/mL for AID. Times to maximum plasma concentration were 5 h for Xeljanz® XR 11 mg and 2 h for AID. Collectively, this modified approach reduces the initial lag time and allows for faster drug action.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12018,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"217 ","pages":"Article 107389"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928098725003860","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acid-sensitive ingredient porosity osmotic drug delivery systems (AID) are a simplified and scalable alternative to conventional ODDS. In the current study, the tofacitinib-loaded AID formulation was optimized using an I-optimal mixture design. The three coating excipients examined as independent variables were cellulose acetate (X₁; 25.8–43.8 %), sodium bicarbonate (X₂; 20.0–30.0 %), and hydroxypropyl cellulose (X₃; 26.3–46.3 %). Response variables included cumulative drug release at 2 h (Y₁), 4 h (Y₂), and 8 h (Y₃), as well as the percentage of residual drug after 8 h (Y₄), which were analyzed using a quadratic model within the I-optimal framework. The coefficient of determination (R²) values for Y₁, Y₂, Y₃, and Y₄ were 0.79, 0.74, 0.55, and 0.48, respectively. The optimized AID exhibited zero-order drug release kinetics (R² = 0.9931), with a release rate constant (K₀) of 0.20 h⁻¹, indicating a consistent and controlled release profile throughout the evaluation period. Pharmacokinetic studies indicated no significant lag time for the AID, while Xeljanz® XR 11 mg exhibited an initial lag time of approximately 0.64 h, consistent with the characteristics of conventional ODDS technologies. Maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) were 75.7 ± 40.8 ng/mL for Xeljanz® XR 11 mg and 79.4 ± 37.1 ng/mL for AID. The areas under the plasma concentration-time curve were 610.0 ± 187.5 ng/mL for Xeljanz® XR 11 mg and 586.1 ± 210.5 ng/mL for AID. Times to maximum plasma concentration were 5 h for Xeljanz® XR 11 mg and 2 h for AID. Collectively, this modified approach reduces the initial lag time and allows for faster drug action.

Abstract Image

一种控释托法替尼配方的开发,使用酸敏感的成孔成分用于渗透给药系统。
酸敏感成分孔隙渗透给药系统(AID)是传统ODDS的一种简化和可扩展的替代方案。在本研究中,采用i -最优混合设计优化了托法替尼负载的AID配方。作为自变量检查的三种涂层辅料是醋酸纤维素(X₁;25.8-43.8%)、碳酸氢钠(X₂;20.0-30.0%)和羟丙基纤维素(X₃;26.3-46.3%)。响应变量包括2 h (Y₁)、4 h (Y₂)和8 h (Y₃)的累积药物释放,以及8 h (Y₄)后残留药物的百分比,这些变量使用i -最优框架内的二次模型进行了分析。Y₁、Y₂、Y₃和Y₄的决定系数(R²)值分别为0.79、0.74、0.55和0.48。优化后的AID具有零级药物释放动力学(R² = 0.9931),其释放速率常数(K 0)为0.20 h⁻¹,表明其在整个评价期内具有一致性和可控的释放特性。药代动力学研究表明,AID没有明显的滞后时间,而Xeljanz®XR 11 mg的初始滞后时间约为0.64 h,与传统ODDS技术的特征一致。Xeljanz®XR 11 mg的最大血药浓度(Cmax)为75.7 ± 40.8 ng/mL, AID为79.4 ± 37.1 ng/mL。Xeljanz®XR 11 mg的血药浓度-时间曲线下面积为610.0 ± 187.5 ng/mL, AID为586.1 ± 210.5 ng/mL。Xeljanz®XR 11 mg达到最大血药浓度的时间为5小时,AID为2小时。总的来说,这种改进的方法减少了初始滞后时间,并允许更快的药物作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
2.20%
发文量
248
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes research articles, review articles and scientific commentaries on all aspects of the pharmaceutical sciences with emphasis on conceptual novelty and scientific quality. The Editors welcome articles in this multidisciplinary field, with a focus on topics relevant for drug discovery and development. More specifically, the Journal publishes reports on medicinal chemistry, pharmacology, drug absorption and metabolism, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, drug delivery (including gene delivery), drug targeting, pharmaceutical technology, pharmaceutical biotechnology and clinical drug evaluation. The journal will typically not give priority to manuscripts focusing primarily on organic synthesis, natural products, adaptation of analytical approaches, or discussions pertaining to drug policy making. Scientific commentaries and review articles are generally by invitation only or by consent of the Editors. Proceedings of scientific meetings may be published as special issues or supplements to the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书