Age-only versus multivariable models for dementia prediction: a comparative analysis.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Current Opinion in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-27 DOI:10.1097/YCO.0000000000001056
Jennifer Dunne, Zhongyang Guan, Eduwin Pakpahan, Blossom C M Stephan
{"title":"Age-only versus multivariable models for dementia prediction: a comparative analysis.","authors":"Jennifer Dunne, Zhongyang Guan, Eduwin Pakpahan, Blossom C M Stephan","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000001056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Accurate dementia risk prediction is critical for prevention, yet it remains unclear which predictors add meaningful value beyond chronological age. This review evaluates the extent to which multivariable dementia risk models identify modifiable risk factors that enhance prediction value.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>We systematically reviewed cohort studies reporting both age-only and multivariable dementia prediction models in the same population. Six age-only models across five cohorts were included. Age-only models achieved poor to good discrimination (C-statistics 0.66-0.84). Adding modifiable cardiovascular and lifestyle factors provided consistent, modest improvements of 0.02-0.05 in the UK Biobank, Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC), and Rotterdam cohorts. Larger improvements of 0.07-0.12 were observed in models including cognitive testing or genetic factors [e.g., UK Biobank Dementia Risk Score (UKBDRS-APOE)] with the Hanley-McNeil z-test confirming the improvements were significant, indicating genuine improvement rather than random variation.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>While age is a significant risk factor for dementia, modifiable cardiovascular and lifestyle factors provide incremental predictive value beyond age and represent actionable targets for prevention. Despite modest statistical improvements, these factors offer the most clinically relevant targets for prevention strategies. Future efforts should prioritise interventions addressing these modifiable determinants to reduce dementia risk across populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"151-159"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000001056","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Accurate dementia risk prediction is critical for prevention, yet it remains unclear which predictors add meaningful value beyond chronological age. This review evaluates the extent to which multivariable dementia risk models identify modifiable risk factors that enhance prediction value.

Recent findings: We systematically reviewed cohort studies reporting both age-only and multivariable dementia prediction models in the same population. Six age-only models across five cohorts were included. Age-only models achieved poor to good discrimination (C-statistics 0.66-0.84). Adding modifiable cardiovascular and lifestyle factors provided consistent, modest improvements of 0.02-0.05 in the UK Biobank, Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC), and Rotterdam cohorts. Larger improvements of 0.07-0.12 were observed in models including cognitive testing or genetic factors [e.g., UK Biobank Dementia Risk Score (UKBDRS-APOE)] with the Hanley-McNeil z-test confirming the improvements were significant, indicating genuine improvement rather than random variation.

Summary: While age is a significant risk factor for dementia, modifiable cardiovascular and lifestyle factors provide incremental predictive value beyond age and represent actionable targets for prevention. Despite modest statistical improvements, these factors offer the most clinically relevant targets for prevention strategies. Future efforts should prioritise interventions addressing these modifiable determinants to reduce dementia risk across populations.

仅年龄与多变量痴呆预测模型:比较分析。
回顾目的:准确的痴呆风险预测对预防至关重要,但目前尚不清楚哪些预测因素在实足年龄之外增加了有意义的价值。本综述评估了多变量痴呆风险模型识别可修改的风险因素的程度,这些因素可以提高预测价值。最近的发现:我们系统地回顾了在同一人群中报告仅年龄和多变量痴呆预测模型的队列研究。包括五个队列中的六个仅限年龄的模型。仅考虑年龄的模型实现了从差到好的区分(C-statistics 0.66-0.84)。在英国生物银行、社区动脉粥样硬化风险(ARIC)和鹿特丹队列中,加入可改变的心血管和生活方式因素提供了一致的、适度的0.02-0.05的改善。在包括认知测试或遗传因素(如英国生物银行痴呆风险评分(UKBDRS-APOE))在内的模型中,观察到0.07-0.12的较大改善,汉利-麦克尼尔z检验证实了改善的显著性,表明真正的改善而不是随机变异。摘要:虽然年龄是痴呆的重要危险因素,但可改变的心血管和生活方式因素提供了超过年龄的增量预测价值,并代表了可操作的预防目标。尽管统计数据略有改善,但这些因素为预防策略提供了最具临床相关性的目标。未来的努力应优先考虑针对这些可改变的决定因素的干预措施,以降低人群中痴呆症的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Current Opinion in Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.40%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Psychiatry is an easy-to-digest bimonthly journal covering the most interesting and important advances in the field of psychiatry. Eight sections on mental health disorders including schizophrenia, neurodevelopmental disorders and eating disorders, are presented alongside five area-specific sections, offering an expert evaluation on the most exciting developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书