{"title":"From concepts to forms: Representation techniques for enhancing creativity in Architectural Design Education","authors":"Eun Joo Park , Eunki Kang , Yoon-jeong Shin","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores how architecture students transform abstract design concepts into spatial forms, focusing on the roles of representation techniques throughout the design process. Through a structured nine-week design studio course, students engaged in five phases of design development: (1) site analysis, (2) concept development, (3) mass study, (4) architectural drawing and (5) spatial form. The study analyses students’ design diaries and critique sessions, as well as quantitative assessments using the Creativity Support Index (CSI). Given its original context, the CSI was conservatively adapted and interpreted as an exploratory measure, with internal reliability (Cronbach’s α) and convergent correlations with tutor ratings reported to support its tentative use in this educational setting. Findings reveal that students who employ iterative, multimodal representation techniques tended to demonstrate more refined design thinking and creative engagement. These outcomes are interpreted as correlational associations rather than causal effects, positioning representational diversity and iteration as design scaffolds for conceptual transformation. We contribute an integrated framework that links representation, design processes, and CSI to measurable outcomes in studio education. By clarifying how abstract ideas are externalised and associated with spatial solutions, the study provides actionable insights for educators seeking to cultivate conceptual thinking in architectural studios.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 102082"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187118712500330X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study explores how architecture students transform abstract design concepts into spatial forms, focusing on the roles of representation techniques throughout the design process. Through a structured nine-week design studio course, students engaged in five phases of design development: (1) site analysis, (2) concept development, (3) mass study, (4) architectural drawing and (5) spatial form. The study analyses students’ design diaries and critique sessions, as well as quantitative assessments using the Creativity Support Index (CSI). Given its original context, the CSI was conservatively adapted and interpreted as an exploratory measure, with internal reliability (Cronbach’s α) and convergent correlations with tutor ratings reported to support its tentative use in this educational setting. Findings reveal that students who employ iterative, multimodal representation techniques tended to demonstrate more refined design thinking and creative engagement. These outcomes are interpreted as correlational associations rather than causal effects, positioning representational diversity and iteration as design scaffolds for conceptual transformation. We contribute an integrated framework that links representation, design processes, and CSI to measurable outcomes in studio education. By clarifying how abstract ideas are externalised and associated with spatial solutions, the study provides actionable insights for educators seeking to cultivate conceptual thinking in architectural studios.
期刊介绍:
Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.