From concepts to forms: Representation techniques for enhancing creativity in Architectural Design Education

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
Thinking Skills and Creativity Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-24 DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102082
Eun Joo Park , Eunki Kang , Yoon-jeong Shin
{"title":"From concepts to forms: Representation techniques for enhancing creativity in Architectural Design Education","authors":"Eun Joo Park ,&nbsp;Eunki Kang ,&nbsp;Yoon-jeong Shin","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores how architecture students transform abstract design concepts into spatial forms, focusing on the roles of representation techniques throughout the design process. Through a structured nine-week design studio course, students engaged in five phases of design development: (1) site analysis, (2) concept development, (3) mass study, (4) architectural drawing and (5) spatial form. The study analyses students’ design diaries and critique sessions, as well as quantitative assessments using the Creativity Support Index (CSI). Given its original context, the CSI was conservatively adapted and interpreted as an exploratory measure, with internal reliability (Cronbach’s α) and convergent correlations with tutor ratings reported to support its tentative use in this educational setting. Findings reveal that students who employ iterative, multimodal representation techniques tended to demonstrate more refined design thinking and creative engagement. These outcomes are interpreted as correlational associations rather than causal effects, positioning representational diversity and iteration as design scaffolds for conceptual transformation. We contribute an integrated framework that links representation, design processes, and CSI to measurable outcomes in studio education. By clarifying how abstract ideas are externalised and associated with spatial solutions, the study provides actionable insights for educators seeking to cultivate conceptual thinking in architectural studios.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 102082"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187118712500330X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores how architecture students transform abstract design concepts into spatial forms, focusing on the roles of representation techniques throughout the design process. Through a structured nine-week design studio course, students engaged in five phases of design development: (1) site analysis, (2) concept development, (3) mass study, (4) architectural drawing and (5) spatial form. The study analyses students’ design diaries and critique sessions, as well as quantitative assessments using the Creativity Support Index (CSI). Given its original context, the CSI was conservatively adapted and interpreted as an exploratory measure, with internal reliability (Cronbach’s α) and convergent correlations with tutor ratings reported to support its tentative use in this educational setting. Findings reveal that students who employ iterative, multimodal representation techniques tended to demonstrate more refined design thinking and creative engagement. These outcomes are interpreted as correlational associations rather than causal effects, positioning representational diversity and iteration as design scaffolds for conceptual transformation. We contribute an integrated framework that links representation, design processes, and CSI to measurable outcomes in studio education. By clarifying how abstract ideas are externalised and associated with spatial solutions, the study provides actionable insights for educators seeking to cultivate conceptual thinking in architectural studios.
从概念到形式:提升建筑设计教育创造力的表现手法
本研究探讨了建筑学学生如何将抽象的设计概念转化为空间形式,重点关注表现技术在整个设计过程中的作用。通过为期九周的结构化设计工作室课程,学生参与了五个阶段的设计开发:(1)现场分析,(2)概念开发,(3)大规模研究,(4)建筑绘图和(5)空间形式。该研究分析了学生的设计日记和评论会议,并使用创意支持指数(CSI)进行定量评估。鉴于其原始背景,CSI被保守地改编并解释为一种探索性措施,其内部信度(Cronbach 's α)和与导师评级的收敛相关性报告支持其在这种教育环境中的试探性使用。研究结果显示,采用迭代、多模态表达技术的学生往往表现出更精细的设计思维和创造性参与。这些结果被解释为相关关联,而不是因果关系,将代表性多样性和迭代定位为概念转换的设计框架。我们提供了一个综合框架,将表现,设计过程和CSI与工作室教育的可衡量结果联系起来。通过澄清抽象概念如何外化并与空间解决方案相关联,该研究为寻求在建筑工作室培养概念思维的教育工作者提供了可行的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书