Fostering entrepreneurial mindsets and future skills: Innovative educational units for enhancing creative problem-solving in tenth-grade students

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
Thinking Skills and Creativity Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-23 DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102084
Mohamed A. Shahat , Sulaiman M. Al-Balushi , Khalsa Al Alawi , Khalsa Al Bahri , Jaana Seikkula-Leino
{"title":"Fostering entrepreneurial mindsets and future skills: Innovative educational units for enhancing creative problem-solving in tenth-grade students","authors":"Mohamed A. Shahat ,&nbsp;Sulaiman M. Al-Balushi ,&nbsp;Khalsa Al Alawi ,&nbsp;Khalsa Al Bahri ,&nbsp;Jaana Seikkula-Leino","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In an era defined by rapid technological advancement and economic uncertainty, creative problem-solving (CPS) has emerged as a cornerstone of future-ready education. Yet traditional curricula often lack the instructional strategies needed to develop the thinking skills and cognitive flexibility essential for navigating real-world challenges. This study contributes to the evolving pedagogy of CPS by designing and testing innovative educational units that integrate entrepreneurial education, creativity-focused thinking, and structured CPS methodologies, including TRIZ - a theory-based inventive problem-solving approach that guides learners to overcome constraints through systematic thinking. Grounded in the Theory of Planned Behavior and the 21st-Century Skills Framework, the study proposes a distinctive approach that combines motivation, skill acquisition, and applied problem-solving. Conducted among 10th-grade students in Muscat, Oman, the study employs a quasi-experimental design to evaluate the impact of these units on three core CPS dimensions: problem understanding, idea generation, and solution development. Data were collected using a validated Creative Problem-Solving Test (CPST) and analyzed across experimental and control groups. Results revealed significant gains in the experimental group, particularly in idea generation (78.74 %), followed by problem understanding (76 %) and solution development (75.33 %). Gender analysis showed that female students outperformed male students across all CPS dimensions, emphasizing the importance of gender-responsive pedagogical strategies. By bridging motivational theory with cognitive skills training and creativity research, this study offers a scalable, evidence-based model for embedding CPS in secondary education. The findings not only align with Oman’s Vision 2040 but also contribute to global discussions on designing instructional interventions that foster innovation, adaptability, and inclusive problem-solving capacity in young learners.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 102084"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187125003323","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In an era defined by rapid technological advancement and economic uncertainty, creative problem-solving (CPS) has emerged as a cornerstone of future-ready education. Yet traditional curricula often lack the instructional strategies needed to develop the thinking skills and cognitive flexibility essential for navigating real-world challenges. This study contributes to the evolving pedagogy of CPS by designing and testing innovative educational units that integrate entrepreneurial education, creativity-focused thinking, and structured CPS methodologies, including TRIZ - a theory-based inventive problem-solving approach that guides learners to overcome constraints through systematic thinking. Grounded in the Theory of Planned Behavior and the 21st-Century Skills Framework, the study proposes a distinctive approach that combines motivation, skill acquisition, and applied problem-solving. Conducted among 10th-grade students in Muscat, Oman, the study employs a quasi-experimental design to evaluate the impact of these units on three core CPS dimensions: problem understanding, idea generation, and solution development. Data were collected using a validated Creative Problem-Solving Test (CPST) and analyzed across experimental and control groups. Results revealed significant gains in the experimental group, particularly in idea generation (78.74 %), followed by problem understanding (76 %) and solution development (75.33 %). Gender analysis showed that female students outperformed male students across all CPS dimensions, emphasizing the importance of gender-responsive pedagogical strategies. By bridging motivational theory with cognitive skills training and creativity research, this study offers a scalable, evidence-based model for embedding CPS in secondary education. The findings not only align with Oman’s Vision 2040 but also contribute to global discussions on designing instructional interventions that foster innovation, adaptability, and inclusive problem-solving capacity in young learners.
培养创业精神和未来技能:创新教育单元,提高十年级学生创造性解决问题的能力
在一个以快速技术进步和经济不确定性为特征的时代,创造性解决问题(CPS)已成为未来准备教育的基石。然而,传统课程往往缺乏培养应对现实世界挑战所必需的思维技能和认知灵活性所需的教学策略。本研究通过设计和测试整合了创业教育、以创造力为中心的思维和结构化CPS方法的创新教育单元,包括TRIZ——一种基于理论的创造性问题解决方法,指导学习者通过系统思考克服限制,从而为CPS教学法的发展做出了贡献。该研究以计划行为理论和21世纪技能框架为基础,提出了一种结合动机、技能获取和应用问题解决的独特方法。该研究在阿曼马斯喀特的10年级学生中进行,采用准实验设计来评估这些单元对CPS三个核心维度的影响:问题理解、想法产生和解决方案开发。使用经过验证的创造性问题解决测试(CPST)收集数据,并在实验组和对照组之间进行分析。结果显示实验组有显著的进步,特别是在创意产生(78.74%),其次是问题理解(76%)和解决方案开发(75.33%)。性别分析表明,女学生在所有CPS维度上的表现都优于男学生,这强调了性别敏感教学策略的重要性。通过将动机理论与认知技能训练和创造力研究联系起来,本研究为在中学教育中嵌入CPS提供了一个可扩展的、基于证据的模型。研究结果不仅符合阿曼的2040年愿景,而且有助于全球讨论如何设计教学干预措施,培养年轻学习者的创新、适应能力和包容性解决问题的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书