Size Does Not Matter: Numeracy and the Effect of Quantity Information on Consumers' Price Judgments

IF 1.4 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Janet Kleber, Arnd Florack, Ellen Peters
{"title":"Size Does Not Matter: Numeracy and the Effect of Quantity Information on Consumers' Price Judgments","authors":"Janet Kleber,&nbsp;Arnd Florack,&nbsp;Ellen Peters","doi":"10.1002/bdm.70051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A product's printed quantity information (e.g., 12 oz) is thought to provide meaningful information for product evaluations. However, previous research suggests that consumers often do not weigh this information. It remains unclear whether some people, in fact, do weigh the information and what factors (e.g., package design) might increase or decrease such a consideration. In one lab experiment and one eye-tracking experiment, we examined the influence of individual differences in objective numeric abilities on the perception and use of quantity information. In both experiments, participants indicated willingness-to-pay judgments for consumer goods (e.g., chocolate and cereals) that varied in their quantity (e.g., 100 vs. 200 g). In each case, we observed an interaction between objective numeracy and quantity on willingness-to-pay judgments. More numerate individuals were more likely to look at quantity information and to use this information in their willingness-to-pay judgments, whereas people with lower numeracy often did not differentiate between quantities. Variations in package design did not change this effect, but the presence of additional quantity indicators increased the use of the original quantity information for people who were more and less numerate. Implications for consumer protection are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","volume":"38 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bdm.70051","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdm.70051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A product's printed quantity information (e.g., 12 oz) is thought to provide meaningful information for product evaluations. However, previous research suggests that consumers often do not weigh this information. It remains unclear whether some people, in fact, do weigh the information and what factors (e.g., package design) might increase or decrease such a consideration. In one lab experiment and one eye-tracking experiment, we examined the influence of individual differences in objective numeric abilities on the perception and use of quantity information. In both experiments, participants indicated willingness-to-pay judgments for consumer goods (e.g., chocolate and cereals) that varied in their quantity (e.g., 100 vs. 200 g). In each case, we observed an interaction between objective numeracy and quantity on willingness-to-pay judgments. More numerate individuals were more likely to look at quantity information and to use this information in their willingness-to-pay judgments, whereas people with lower numeracy often did not differentiate between quantities. Variations in package design did not change this effect, but the presence of additional quantity indicators increased the use of the original quantity information for people who were more and less numerate. Implications for consumer protection are discussed.

Abstract Image

大小无关紧要:计算能力和数量信息对消费者价格判断的影响
产品的印刷数量信息(例如,12盎司)被认为为产品评估提供有意义的信息。然而,先前的研究表明,消费者通常不会考虑这些信息。目前尚不清楚是否有些人实际上会权衡这些信息,以及哪些因素(例如,包装设计)可能会增加或减少这种考虑。在一个实验室实验和一个眼动追踪实验中,我们考察了客观数字能力的个体差异对数量信息感知和使用的影响。在这两个实验中,参与者都表示了对数量不同的消费品(如巧克力和谷物)的支付意愿判断(如100克和200克)。在每种情况下,我们观察到客观计算和数量对支付意愿判断之间的相互作用。计算能力较强的人更有可能看数量信息,并在判断支付意愿时使用这些信息,而计算能力较弱的人往往无法区分数量。包装设计的变化并没有改变这种效果,但是额外的数量指标的存在增加了对原始数量信息的使用,对于那些更多和更少计算的人来说。对消费者保护的影响进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral Decision Making is a multidisciplinary journal with a broad base of content and style. It publishes original empirical reports, critical review papers, theoretical analyses and methodological contributions. The Journal also features book, software and decision aiding technique reviews, abstracts of important articles published elsewhere and teaching suggestions. The objective of the Journal is to present and stimulate behavioral research on decision making and to provide a forum for the evaluation of complementary, contrasting and conflicting perspectives. These perspectives include psychology, management science, sociology, political science and economics. Studies of behavioral decision making in naturalistic and applied settings are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书