Perspectives for artificial intelligence in bioprocess automation

IF 7.8 2区 工程技术 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Current opinion in biotechnology Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-28 DOI:10.1016/j.copbio.2025.103392
Laura Marie Helleckes , Sebastian Putz , Kshitiz Gupta , Matthias Franzreb , Hector Garcia Martin
{"title":"Perspectives for artificial intelligence in bioprocess automation","authors":"Laura Marie Helleckes ,&nbsp;Sebastian Putz ,&nbsp;Kshitiz Gupta ,&nbsp;Matthias Franzreb ,&nbsp;Hector Garcia Martin","doi":"10.1016/j.copbio.2025.103392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have rapidly changed the lab automation landscape, promoting self-driving laboratories (SDLs) that enable autonomous scientific discovery. These trends are increasingly applied in bioprocess development, yet bioprocessing faces unique challenges — biological complexity, regulatory and safety requirements, and multiscale experimentation — that distinguish it from other automation domains. Rather than pursuing full autonomy, we foresee that hybrid SDLs, combining AI-driven decision-making with sustained human oversight, represent the most practical near-term trajectory. This review examines three interconnected perspectives: (i) hybrid human–machine decision-making for bioprocessing; (ii) laboratory design considerations in the era of AI; and (iii) scale-up challenges when transitioning from screening to manufacturing. We highlight critical gaps in data standardization and the required community efforts necessary to realize autonomous bioprocess innovation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10833,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in biotechnology","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 103392"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958166925001363","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have rapidly changed the lab automation landscape, promoting self-driving laboratories (SDLs) that enable autonomous scientific discovery. These trends are increasingly applied in bioprocess development, yet bioprocessing faces unique challenges — biological complexity, regulatory and safety requirements, and multiscale experimentation — that distinguish it from other automation domains. Rather than pursuing full autonomy, we foresee that hybrid SDLs, combining AI-driven decision-making with sustained human oversight, represent the most practical near-term trajectory. This review examines three interconnected perspectives: (i) hybrid human–machine decision-making for bioprocessing; (ii) laboratory design considerations in the era of AI; and (iii) scale-up challenges when transitioning from screening to manufacturing. We highlight critical gaps in data standardization and the required community efforts necessary to realize autonomous bioprocess innovation.
人工智能在生物过程自动化中的应用前景
人工智能(AI)的最新进展迅速改变了实验室自动化的格局,推动了能够自主科学发现的自动驾驶实验室(sdl)的发展。这些趋势越来越多地应用于生物工艺开发,但生物加工面临着独特的挑战-生物复杂性,监管和安全要求,以及多尺度实验-将其与其他自动化领域区分开来。我们预计,混合sdl(将人工智能驱动的决策与持续的人类监督相结合)将代表最实用的近期发展轨迹,而不是追求完全自主。本文综述了三个相互关联的观点:(i)生物加工的混合人机决策;(ii)人工智能时代的实验室设计考量;(三)从筛选过渡到生产时的规模挑战。我们强调了数据标准化方面的关键差距,以及实现自主生物工艺创新所需的社区努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current opinion in biotechnology
Current opinion in biotechnology 工程技术-生化研究方法
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
226
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Biotechnology (COBIOT) is renowned for publishing authoritative, comprehensive, and systematic reviews. By offering clear and readable syntheses of current advances in biotechnology, COBIOT assists specialists in staying updated on the latest developments in the field. Expert authors annotate the most noteworthy papers from the vast array of information available today, providing readers with valuable insights and saving them time. As part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals, COBIOT is accompanied by the open-access primary research journal, Current Research in Biotechnology (CRBIOT). Leveraging the editorial excellence, high impact, and global reach of the Current Opinion legacy, CO+RE journals ensure they are widely read resources integral to scientists' workflows. COBIOT is organized into themed sections, each reviewed once a year. These themes cover various areas of biotechnology, including analytical biotechnology, plant biotechnology, food biotechnology, energy biotechnology, environmental biotechnology, systems biology, nanobiotechnology, tissue, cell, and pathway engineering, chemical biotechnology, and pharmaceutical biotechnology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书