Incidents of sudden death during restraint of agitated individuals in Sweden between 1992 and 2024

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Journal of forensic sciences Pub Date : 2026-03-08 Epub Date: 2025-11-25 DOI:10.1111/1556-4029.70237
Alexander Tyr PhD, Erik Lindeman MD, Fredrik Tamsen MD, PhD, Ingemar Thiblin MD, PhD, Brita Zilg MD, PhD
{"title":"Incidents of sudden death during restraint of agitated individuals in Sweden between 1992 and 2024","authors":"Alexander Tyr PhD,&nbsp;Erik Lindeman MD,&nbsp;Fredrik Tamsen MD, PhD,&nbsp;Ingemar Thiblin MD, PhD,&nbsp;Brita Zilg MD, PhD","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.70237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Restraint-related sudden deaths in agitated individuals raise complex questions at the intersection of medicine and law. Hyperactive delirium with extreme agitation as well as positional asphyxia due to restraint have been proposed to account for these deaths. However, the exact physiological mechanisms responsible and to what extent restraint contributes to the lethal outcome remain debated. In this nationwide, 32-year retrospective study between 1992 and 2024, we examined circumstances surrounding sudden deaths during restraint of agitated individuals in Sweden. A total of 52 cases were identified, with an average of 0.17 deaths per million inhabitants annually. Ninety percent of cases involved prone restraint and 69% showed evidence of stimulant use. In 15 cases from 2005 onward, peri-arrest arterial blood gas data revealed profound metabolic and respiratory acidosis, with a mean blood pH of 6.52 (range: 6.30–6.95; median: 6.50), mean lactate concentration of 26.3 mmol/L (range: 8.6–41.0; median: 30), and mean pCO<sub>2</sub> of 14.8 kPa (range: 6.4–22.3; median: 15.3). Based on these findings, we propose a two-phase pathophysiological model of restraint-related cardiac arrest. The initial “priming phase” involves extreme physical exertion, creating a critically acidotic state that requires full respiratory and cardiovascular function to maintain homeostasis. If the “priming phase” is followed by restraint that restricts ventilatory function and hampers venous return, e.g., restraint in the prone position, an unstable “tipping phase” is initiated, that may culminate in cardiac arrest. This model builds on previous hypotheses and emphasizes the potentially lethal consequences of inhibiting ventilatory function in acutely agitated individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":15743,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic sciences","volume":"71 2","pages":"821-836"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12967712/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1556-4029.70237","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Restraint-related sudden deaths in agitated individuals raise complex questions at the intersection of medicine and law. Hyperactive delirium with extreme agitation as well as positional asphyxia due to restraint have been proposed to account for these deaths. However, the exact physiological mechanisms responsible and to what extent restraint contributes to the lethal outcome remain debated. In this nationwide, 32-year retrospective study between 1992 and 2024, we examined circumstances surrounding sudden deaths during restraint of agitated individuals in Sweden. A total of 52 cases were identified, with an average of 0.17 deaths per million inhabitants annually. Ninety percent of cases involved prone restraint and 69% showed evidence of stimulant use. In 15 cases from 2005 onward, peri-arrest arterial blood gas data revealed profound metabolic and respiratory acidosis, with a mean blood pH of 6.52 (range: 6.30–6.95; median: 6.50), mean lactate concentration of 26.3 mmol/L (range: 8.6–41.0; median: 30), and mean pCO2 of 14.8 kPa (range: 6.4–22.3; median: 15.3). Based on these findings, we propose a two-phase pathophysiological model of restraint-related cardiac arrest. The initial “priming phase” involves extreme physical exertion, creating a critically acidotic state that requires full respiratory and cardiovascular function to maintain homeostasis. If the “priming phase” is followed by restraint that restricts ventilatory function and hampers venous return, e.g., restraint in the prone position, an unstable “tipping phase” is initiated, that may culminate in cardiac arrest. This model builds on previous hypotheses and emphasizes the potentially lethal consequences of inhibiting ventilatory function in acutely agitated individuals.

Abstract Image

1992年至2024年期间,瑞典对激动的个人进行约束期间的猝死事件。
在激动的个体中与约束相关的突然死亡在医学和法律的交叉点提出了复杂的问题。伴有极度躁动的过度活跃谵妄以及由于约束造成的体位性窒息被认为是导致这些死亡的原因。然而,确切的生理机制负责和在多大程度上限制有助于致命的结果仍然存在争议。在这项1992年至2024年的全国性32年回顾性研究中,我们研究了瑞典在控制激动个体时突然死亡的情况。总共确定了52个病例,平均每年每百万居民死亡0.17人。90%的病例涉及俯卧约束,69%的病例有使用兴奋剂的证据。自2005年以来,15例患者的停搏期动脉血气数据显示严重的代谢性和呼吸性酸中毒,平均血液pH值为6.52(范围:6.30-6.95;中位数:6.50),平均乳酸浓度为26.3 mmol/L(范围:8.6-41.0;中位数:30),平均二氧化碳分压为14.8 kPa(范围:6.4-22.3;中位数:15.3)。基于这些发现,我们提出了一个抑制相关性心脏骤停的两阶段病理生理模型。最初的“启动阶段”包括极端的体力消耗,造成严重的酸中毒状态,需要充分的呼吸和心血管功能来维持体内平衡。如果“启动阶段”之后是限制通气功能和阻碍静脉回流的束缚,例如俯卧位的束缚,则开始一个不稳定的“引爆阶段”,最终可能导致心脏骤停。该模型建立在先前的假设上,并强调急性激动个体抑制通气功能的潜在致命后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of forensic sciences
Journal of forensic sciences 医学-医学:法
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
215
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Forensic Sciences (JFS) is the official publication of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS). It is devoted to the publication of original investigations, observations, scholarly inquiries and reviews in various branches of the forensic sciences. These include anthropology, criminalistics, digital and multimedia sciences, engineering and applied sciences, pathology/biology, psychiatry and behavioral science, jurisprudence, odontology, questioned documents, and toxicology. Similar submissions dealing with forensic aspects of other sciences and the social sciences are also accepted, as are submissions dealing with scientifically sound emerging science disciplines. The content and/or views expressed in the JFS are not necessarily those of the AAFS, the JFS Editorial Board, the organizations with which authors are affiliated, or the publisher of JFS. All manuscript submissions are double-blind peer-reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书