{"title":"Telehealth use in Voluntary Assisted Dying: a systematic review.","authors":"Imogen Summers, Elizabeth Reymond, Helen M Haydon","doi":"10.1071/AH25113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to identify how telehealth supports access to Voluntary Assisted Dying (VAD) globally and explore potential risks and benefits of telehealth for VAD consultations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of peer-reviewed articles on telehealth and VAD examining global use of telehealth to support access to VAD, global restrictions to telehealth-enabled VAD, and practical and clinical implications of using telehealth in supporting VAD was performed. PubMed, Embase (Excerpta Medica Database), CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Web of Science, and Scopus were searched and supplemented by handsearching relevant articles. Study quality was assessed using the SQUIRE (The Standard for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and thirty articles were identified and then screened by two reviewers. Data were extracted from 26 included articles. Guided by Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis methodology, manual open coding was undertaken, and peer debriefing meetings resulted in the final key themes. Overall, findings indicate that telehealth can facilitate VAD services, enhance patient and provider experiences, and mitigate access inequities. The analysis highlighted that telehealth could further improve VAD access, especially in rural and remote areas. Until then, there are ongoing legal ambiguities for providers in Australia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telehealth can improve access to VAD, particularly in remote areas, reducing travel burdens for terminally ill patients. Global evidence from VAD and other sensitive medical fields supports the conclusion that telehealth's benefits outweigh its risks. Legislative clarity in Australia is necessary to resolve conflicts between federal and state laws and to provide clarity for healthcare providers and improve access for eligible patients. Future research should include more robust measures of the efficacy of telehealth.</p>","PeriodicalId":93891,"journal":{"name":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH25113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to identify how telehealth supports access to Voluntary Assisted Dying (VAD) globally and explore potential risks and benefits of telehealth for VAD consultations.
Methods: A systematic review of peer-reviewed articles on telehealth and VAD examining global use of telehealth to support access to VAD, global restrictions to telehealth-enabled VAD, and practical and clinical implications of using telehealth in supporting VAD was performed. PubMed, Embase (Excerpta Medica Database), CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Web of Science, and Scopus were searched and supplemented by handsearching relevant articles. Study quality was assessed using the SQUIRE (The Standard for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines.
Results: Two hundred and thirty articles were identified and then screened by two reviewers. Data were extracted from 26 included articles. Guided by Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis methodology, manual open coding was undertaken, and peer debriefing meetings resulted in the final key themes. Overall, findings indicate that telehealth can facilitate VAD services, enhance patient and provider experiences, and mitigate access inequities. The analysis highlighted that telehealth could further improve VAD access, especially in rural and remote areas. Until then, there are ongoing legal ambiguities for providers in Australia.
Conclusions: Telehealth can improve access to VAD, particularly in remote areas, reducing travel burdens for terminally ill patients. Global evidence from VAD and other sensitive medical fields supports the conclusion that telehealth's benefits outweigh its risks. Legislative clarity in Australia is necessary to resolve conflicts between federal and state laws and to provide clarity for healthcare providers and improve access for eligible patients. Future research should include more robust measures of the efficacy of telehealth.
目的:确定远程医疗如何支持全球自愿辅助死亡(VAD)的获取,并探讨远程医疗对VAD咨询的潜在风险和益处。方法:系统地审查同行评议的远程医疗和VAD文章,审查全球使用远程医疗来支持获得VAD,全球限制远程医疗支持的VAD,以及使用远程医疗支持VAD的实际和临床意义。检索PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus并通过手工检索相关文章进行补充。使用SQUIRE指南评估研究质量。结果:两名审稿人共筛选了230篇文章。数据从纳入的26篇文章中提取。在Braun和Clarke的主题分析方法的指导下,进行了手动开放编码,同行汇报会议产生了最终的关键主题。总体而言,研究结果表明,远程保健可以促进VAD服务,改善患者和提供者的体验,并减轻获取不公平现象。分析强调,远程保健在非刑事化后,特别是在农村和偏远地区,可以进一步改善VAD的获取。在此之前,供应商在法律上的模糊性仍然存在。结论:远程医疗可以改善VAD的可及性,特别是在偏远地区,减少绝症患者的旅行负担。来自VAD和其他敏感医疗领域的全球证据支持远程保健利大于弊的结论。澳大利亚的立法明确性对于解决联邦和州法律之间的冲突、为医疗保健提供者提供明确性和改善符合条件的患者获得服务是必要的。未来的研究应包括对远程医疗功效的更有力的衡量。