Health workforce policy in Queensland: mapping the state government landscape.

IF 1.4
Stephanie M Topp, Thu Nguyen, Lana M Elliott
{"title":"Health workforce policy in Queensland: mapping the state government landscape.","authors":"Stephanie M Topp, Thu Nguyen, Lana M Elliott","doi":"10.1071/AH25134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to systematically map the scope, focus, and distribution of Queensland's health workforce (HWF) policies and examine their alignment with strategic HWF objectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive policy review was conducted using documents sourced from the Queensland Health and Health Workforce Queensland websites between January and May 2025. Documents were coded by policy type (system-level, individual-level, employment), document type, strategic domain (supply, distribution, performance), health profession, policy author, and publication year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 275 policy documents were identified. Among 11 major policy groupings, most policies related to 'general HWF' and 'medical doctors and specialists' with minimal policy attention to pharmacists, physician assistants, paramedics, and aged care workers. Employment-focused policies accounted for 52% of all documents, compared with 38% focused on individual career development and only 10% on system-level strategic objectives. Most documents addressed workforce performance (65%), with fewer addressing supply (39%) or distribution (11%). Employment policy documents were largely authored by human resources and industrial relations bodies, reflecting the prominence of these actors in the HWF policy landscape.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite a high volume of HWF policy in Queensland, the policy architecture is fragmented. Profession-specific siloes, a strong emphasis on employment and industrial policy, and uneven focus across supply, distribution and performance domains suggest coordination and alignment challenges when it comes to addressing broader workforce goals. Further work is needed to understand whether and how these patterns may constrain the development of integrated, equitable workforce strategies capable of addressing persistent system-wide planning issues such as skills mix, retention and rural maldistribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":93891,"journal":{"name":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH25134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to systematically map the scope, focus, and distribution of Queensland's health workforce (HWF) policies and examine their alignment with strategic HWF objectives.

Methods: A descriptive policy review was conducted using documents sourced from the Queensland Health and Health Workforce Queensland websites between January and May 2025. Documents were coded by policy type (system-level, individual-level, employment), document type, strategic domain (supply, distribution, performance), health profession, policy author, and publication year.

Results: A total of 275 policy documents were identified. Among 11 major policy groupings, most policies related to 'general HWF' and 'medical doctors and specialists' with minimal policy attention to pharmacists, physician assistants, paramedics, and aged care workers. Employment-focused policies accounted for 52% of all documents, compared with 38% focused on individual career development and only 10% on system-level strategic objectives. Most documents addressed workforce performance (65%), with fewer addressing supply (39%) or distribution (11%). Employment policy documents were largely authored by human resources and industrial relations bodies, reflecting the prominence of these actors in the HWF policy landscape.

Conclusions: Despite a high volume of HWF policy in Queensland, the policy architecture is fragmented. Profession-specific siloes, a strong emphasis on employment and industrial policy, and uneven focus across supply, distribution and performance domains suggest coordination and alignment challenges when it comes to addressing broader workforce goals. Further work is needed to understand whether and how these patterns may constrain the development of integrated, equitable workforce strategies capable of addressing persistent system-wide planning issues such as skills mix, retention and rural maldistribution.

昆士兰州卫生人力政策:绘制州政府景观图。
目的:系统地绘制昆士兰州卫生人力(HWF)政策的范围、重点和分布,并检查其与HWF战略目标的一致性。方法:对2025年1月至5月期间昆士兰州卫生和卫生人力网站上的文件进行描述性政策审查。文件按政策类型(系统级、个人级、就业级)、文件类型、战略领域(供应、分布、绩效)、卫生专业、政策作者和出版年份进行编码。结果:共识别政策文件275份。在11个主要政策类别中,大多数政策与“普通医疗卫生工作者”和“医生和专家”有关,对药剂师、医师助理、护理人员和老年护理人员的政策关注最少。以就业为重点的政策占所有文件的52%,相比之下,38%的文件关注个人职业发展,只有10%的文件关注系统层面的战略目标。大多数文件涉及劳动力绩效(65%),较少涉及供应(39%)或分配(11%)。就业政策文件主要由人力资源和劳资关系机构撰写,反映了它们在世界经济论坛政策格局中的突出地位。结论:尽管昆士兰州的HWF政策数量庞大,但政策架构是碎片化的。特定职业的竖井、对就业和产业政策的高度重视,以及战略领域的不均衡关注,都表明在解决更广泛的劳动力目标时,需要协调和协调。需要进一步的工作来了解这些模式是否以及如何限制能够解决农村分配不均和全系统劳动力规划等长期问题的综合、公平的劳动力战略的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书