Artificial intelligence in neonatal sepsis: Scope, challenges, and potential solutions!

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-19 DOI:10.1016/j.siny.2025.101687
Deepika Kainth, Ramesh Agarwal
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in neonatal sepsis: Scope, challenges, and potential solutions!","authors":"Deepika Kainth,&nbsp;Ramesh Agarwal","doi":"10.1016/j.siny.2025.101687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Neonatal sepsis remains a major cause of neonatal deaths globally. Despite advances, accurate and timely diagnosis is hindered by the limited performance of the current clinical approaches, imperfect laboratory biomarkers, and long turnaround time of blood cultures. Artificial intelligence (AI), with its ability to identify patterns and learn continuously (machine learning), seems promising. Basic steps in model development include data filtration, train: test split, feature selection, choosing appropriate algorithms, and evaluating performance using a reference standard. In neonatal sepsis, the role of AI spans from predicting sepsis and related outcomes to formulating an individualized treatment approach for the neonate. Existing models, largely from high-income countries, report encouraging diagnostic accuracy but face methodological limitations, lack external validation, and remain somewhat distant from bedside application. Additional barriers to their generalizability include lack of uniform definition of sepsis, variations in disease and pathogen profiles in different settings (particularly in developing countries), availability of electronic health data, tweaks in feature selection, and ethical and legal challenges. This review synthesizes current evidence, highlights gaps, and outlines priorities for future research. We call for a collaborative effort from AI and neonatal experts to devise robust, context-specific solutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49547,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":"31 1","pages":"Article 101687"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1744165X25000812","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neonatal sepsis remains a major cause of neonatal deaths globally. Despite advances, accurate and timely diagnosis is hindered by the limited performance of the current clinical approaches, imperfect laboratory biomarkers, and long turnaround time of blood cultures. Artificial intelligence (AI), with its ability to identify patterns and learn continuously (machine learning), seems promising. Basic steps in model development include data filtration, train: test split, feature selection, choosing appropriate algorithms, and evaluating performance using a reference standard. In neonatal sepsis, the role of AI spans from predicting sepsis and related outcomes to formulating an individualized treatment approach for the neonate. Existing models, largely from high-income countries, report encouraging diagnostic accuracy but face methodological limitations, lack external validation, and remain somewhat distant from bedside application. Additional barriers to their generalizability include lack of uniform definition of sepsis, variations in disease and pathogen profiles in different settings (particularly in developing countries), availability of electronic health data, tweaks in feature selection, and ethical and legal challenges. This review synthesizes current evidence, highlights gaps, and outlines priorities for future research. We call for a collaborative effort from AI and neonatal experts to devise robust, context-specific solutions.
新生儿败血症中的人工智能:范围、挑战和潜在解决方案!
新生儿败血症仍然是全球新生儿死亡的一个主要原因。尽管取得了进步,但由于目前临床方法的性能有限,实验室生物标志物不完善以及血液培养的周转时间长,阻碍了准确和及时的诊断。人工智能(AI)具有识别模式和持续学习(机器学习)的能力,似乎很有前景。模型开发的基本步骤包括数据过滤、训练:测试分割、特征选择、选择适当的算法,以及使用参考标准评估性能。在新生儿败血症中,人工智能的作用从预测败血症和相关结果到为新生儿制定个性化治疗方法。现有的模型,主要来自高收入国家,报告了令人鼓舞的诊断准确性,但面临方法上的限制,缺乏外部验证,离临床应用还有一定距离。影响其推广的其他障碍包括:缺乏对败血症的统一定义、不同环境(特别是在发展中国家)疾病和病原体概况的差异、电子卫生数据的可用性、特征选择的调整以及伦理和法律挑战。这篇综述综合了目前的证据,突出了差距,并概述了未来研究的重点。我们呼吁人工智能和新生儿专家共同努力,制定稳健的、针对具体情况的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine (formerly Seminars in Neonatology) is a bi-monthly journal which publishes topic-based issues, including current ''Hot Topics'' on the latest advances in fetal and neonatal medicine. The Journal is of interest to obstetricians and maternal-fetal medicine specialists. The Journal commissions review-based content covering current clinical opinion on the care and treatment of the pregnant patient and the neonate and draws on the necessary specialist knowledge, including that of the pediatric pulmonologist, the pediatric infectious disease specialist, the surgeon, as well as the general pediatrician and obstetrician. Each topic-based issue is edited by an authority in their field and contains 8-10 articles. Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine provides: • Coverage of major developments in neonatal care; • Value to practising neonatologists, consultant and trainee pediatricians, obstetricians, midwives and fetal medicine specialists wishing to extend their knowledge in this field; • Up-to-date information in an attractive and relevant format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书