Teaching multilevel policy and advocacy in aging-related classes: policy and practice lessons from a National Teaching Institute.

IF 1.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Angela K Perone, Laura K M Donorfio, Tina M K Newsham, Lisa Borrero, Janelle Fassi, Abigail T Stephan
{"title":"Teaching multilevel policy and advocacy in aging-related classes: policy and practice lessons from a National Teaching Institute.","authors":"Angela K Perone, Laura K M Donorfio, Tina M K Newsham, Lisa Borrero, Janelle Fassi, Abigail T Stephan","doi":"10.1080/02701960.2025.2594453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Micro-, meso-, and macro-level policies shape the work of gerontologists, geriatricians, and others in aging, yet multilevel policy and advocacy are rarely examined by gerontological scholars or incorporated into aging-related curriculum. Gerontologists and geriatricians need more tools to understand key policy and advocacy concepts and how these concepts apply to their work. Therefore, we developed and delivered an Academy for Gerontology in Higher Education/Emerging Scholar and Professional Organization-sponsored four-hour workshop on policy and advocacy to attendees of the 2024 annual scientific meeting of the Gerontological Society of America. The purpose of the workshop was to enhance participants' confidence and abilities to teach advocacy, to incorporate their research into advocacy efforts, and to advocate within their campuses or organizations. We gathered pre- and post-workshop evaluation data from participants to examine its impact on these outcomes. Here, we provide a description of the content from the workshop and outcomes of the evaluation effort, which indicated that participating in the workshop had a positive impact on participants' knowledge and confidence related to advocacy. We believe this workshop-style approach serves as a model for others seeking to increase confidence and preparedness of faculty engaging in teaching and research-related to multilevel policy and advocacy efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":46431,"journal":{"name":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2025.2594453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Micro-, meso-, and macro-level policies shape the work of gerontologists, geriatricians, and others in aging, yet multilevel policy and advocacy are rarely examined by gerontological scholars or incorporated into aging-related curriculum. Gerontologists and geriatricians need more tools to understand key policy and advocacy concepts and how these concepts apply to their work. Therefore, we developed and delivered an Academy for Gerontology in Higher Education/Emerging Scholar and Professional Organization-sponsored four-hour workshop on policy and advocacy to attendees of the 2024 annual scientific meeting of the Gerontological Society of America. The purpose of the workshop was to enhance participants' confidence and abilities to teach advocacy, to incorporate their research into advocacy efforts, and to advocate within their campuses or organizations. We gathered pre- and post-workshop evaluation data from participants to examine its impact on these outcomes. Here, we provide a description of the content from the workshop and outcomes of the evaluation effort, which indicated that participating in the workshop had a positive impact on participants' knowledge and confidence related to advocacy. We believe this workshop-style approach serves as a model for others seeking to increase confidence and preparedness of faculty engaging in teaching and research-related to multilevel policy and advocacy efforts.

在老龄相关课程中进行多层次政策与倡导教学:来自某国家级教学机构的政策与实践经验。
微观、中观和宏观层面的政策影响着老年学家、老年病学家和其他老年人的工作,然而,老年学者很少研究多层次的政策和倡导,也很少将其纳入与老龄化相关的课程。老年病学家和老年病学家需要更多的工具来理解关键的政策和倡导概念,以及这些概念如何应用于他们的工作。因此,我们为参加2024年美国老年学学会年度科学会议的与会者开发并举办了一个由高等教育/新兴学者和专业组织赞助的四小时政策和宣传研讨会。讲习班的目的是增强参加者传授倡导的信心和能力,将他们的研究纳入倡导工作,并在他们的校园或组织内进行倡导。我们从参与者那里收集了研讨会前后的评估数据,以检验其对这些结果的影响。在这里,我们提供了对研讨会内容和评估工作结果的描述,这表明参加研讨会对参与者与倡导相关的知识和信心产生了积极影响。我们相信,这种研讨会式的方法可以作为其他寻求增加教师参与与多层次政策和倡导工作相关的教学和研究的信心和准备的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
18.80%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Gerontology & Geriatrics Education is geared toward the exchange of information related to research, curriculum development, course and program evaluation, classroom and practice innovation, and other topics with educational implications for gerontology and geriatrics. It is designed to appeal to a broad range of students, teachers, practitioners, administrators, and policy makers and is dedicated to improving awareness of best practices and resources for gerontologists and gerontology/geriatrics educators. Peer Review Policy: All research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by two anonymous referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书