General Versus Non-General Anesthesia in Endovascular Thrombectomy for Distal/Medium Vessel Occlusions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Clinical Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-25 DOI:10.1007/s00062-025-01592-7
Luiz Guilherme Silva Almeida, Ocílio Ribeiro Gonçalves, Mariana Lee Han, Yasmin Picanço Silva, Lucca Tamara Alves Carretta, Marcelo Costa, Paweł Łajczak, Luiz Felipe Simões Antunes Nery Dos Santos, Rafael Torres Fonseca Dos Santos, Ahmet Günkan, Pascal Jabbour
{"title":"General Versus Non-General Anesthesia in Endovascular Thrombectomy for Distal/Medium Vessel Occlusions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Luiz Guilherme Silva Almeida, Ocílio Ribeiro Gonçalves, Mariana Lee Han, Yasmin Picanço Silva, Lucca Tamara Alves Carretta, Marcelo Costa, Paweł Łajczak, Luiz Felipe Simões Antunes Nery Dos Santos, Rafael Torres Fonseca Dos Santos, Ahmet Günkan, Pascal Jabbour","doi":"10.1007/s00062-025-01592-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>With the expanding use of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for distal and medium vessel occlusions (DMVOs), evaluating how anesthesia type affects clinical outcomes is essential. This meta-analysis compared outcomes between general anesthesia (GA) and non-GA in patients undergoing EVT for DMVOs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for eligible studies. Primary outcomes included successful reperfusion, 90-day mortality, excellent functional outcome (Modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-1), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method and a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with I<sup>2</sup> and Cochran's Q test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies comprising 1643 patients were included. There was no significant difference in successful reperfusion between GA and non-GA groups (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.94-1.08; I<sup>2</sup> = 32.3%). However, GA was associated with significantly higher 90-day mortality (RR 1.55; 95% CI 1.23-1.96; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Excellent functional outcomes (mRS 0-1 at 90 days) were similar between groups (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.78-1.10; I<sup>2</sup> = 24.2%). No statistically significant difference in sICH was observed between the GA and non-GA groups (RR 2.61; 95% CI 0.99-6.86; I<sup>2</sup> = 40.8%). However, the leave-one-out analysis revealed a significant association indicating a higher risk of sICH with GA (RR 3.88; 95% CI 1.79-8.41; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GA was linked to increased 90-day mortality in EVT for DMVOs, with no differences in reperfusion or functional recovery. A possible higher risk of sICH was noted. Further prospective studies are needed to guide anesthetic strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49298,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"273-284"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-025-01592-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: With the expanding use of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for distal and medium vessel occlusions (DMVOs), evaluating how anesthesia type affects clinical outcomes is essential. This meta-analysis compared outcomes between general anesthesia (GA) and non-GA in patients undergoing EVT for DMVOs.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for eligible studies. Primary outcomes included successful reperfusion, 90-day mortality, excellent functional outcome (Modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-1), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method and a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 and Cochran's Q test.

Results: Five studies comprising 1643 patients were included. There was no significant difference in successful reperfusion between GA and non-GA groups (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.94-1.08; I2 = 32.3%). However, GA was associated with significantly higher 90-day mortality (RR 1.55; 95% CI 1.23-1.96; I2 = 0%). Excellent functional outcomes (mRS 0-1 at 90 days) were similar between groups (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.78-1.10; I2 = 24.2%). No statistically significant difference in sICH was observed between the GA and non-GA groups (RR 2.61; 95% CI 0.99-6.86; I2 = 40.8%). However, the leave-one-out analysis revealed a significant association indicating a higher risk of sICH with GA (RR 3.88; 95% CI 1.79-8.41; I2 = 0%).

Conclusion: GA was linked to increased 90-day mortality in EVT for DMVOs, with no differences in reperfusion or functional recovery. A possible higher risk of sICH was noted. Further prospective studies are needed to guide anesthetic strategy.

对远端/中端血管闭塞进行血管内取栓的全麻与非全麻:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:随着血管内取栓术(EVT)在远端和中端血管闭塞(DMVOs)中的应用越来越广泛,评估麻醉类型如何影响临床结果是必要的。这项荟萃分析比较了全身麻醉(GA)和非全身麻醉(non-GA)对DMVOs患者进行EVT的结果。方法:我们系统地检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和Web of Science,寻找符合条件的研究。主要结局包括再灌注成功、90天死亡率、良好的功能结局(改良Rankin量表[mRS] 0-1)和症状性颅内出血(siich)。采用Mantel-Haenszel方法和随机效应模型计算95%置信区间(CI)的风险比(RR)。采用I2和Cochran’s Q检验评估异质性。结果:纳入5项研究,共1643例患者。GA组与非GA组再灌注成功率无显著性差异(RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.94-1.08; I2 = 32.3%)。然而,GA与较高的90天死亡率相关(RR 1.55; 95% CI 1.23-1.96; I2 = 0%)。两组间良好的功能结局(90天mRS 0-1)相似(RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.78-1.10; I2 = 24.2%)。GA组与非GA组间sICH发生率无统计学差异(RR 2.61; 95% CI 0.99-6.86; I2 = 40.8%)。然而,留一分析显示,sICH与GA的风险较高(RR 3.88; 95% CI 1.79-8.41; I2 = 0%)。结论:GA与DMVOs EVT的90天死亡率增加有关,在再灌注或功能恢复方面没有差异。注意到siich可能存在较高的风险。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来指导麻醉策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuroradiology
Clinical Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
106
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuroradiology provides current information, original contributions, and reviews in the field of neuroradiology. An interdisciplinary approach is accomplished by diagnostic and therapeutic contributions related to associated subjects. The international coverage and relevance of the journal is underlined by its being the official journal of the German, Swiss, and Austrian Societies of Neuroradiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书