The Role of Monosodium Glutamate in Food Allergies and Its Health Implications.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Maria Zofia Lisiecka
{"title":"The Role of Monosodium Glutamate in Food Allergies and Its Health Implications.","authors":"Maria Zofia Lisiecka","doi":"10.1080/27697061.2025.2587739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Monosodium glutamate (MSG) is frequently utilized as a flavor enhancer, yet it remains controversial due to repeated claims linking it to adverse or allergic-like reactions. The purpose of this review was to determine whether MSG meaningfully contributes to actual food allergies, pseudoallergic phenomena, or systemic metabolic effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic evaluation of articles published from 2019 onward, supplemented by foundational studies on MSG safety, was undertaken to assess both clinical and mechanistic evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings indicate that anecdotal reports concerning Chinese Restaurant Syndrome (CRS) primarily draw upon uncontrolled research or subjective accounts, whereas double-blind, placebo-controlled investigations rarely confirm consistent symptomatology when realistic dietary doses are administered. Although certain participants display transient intolerance manifestations under high-dose, empty-stomach challenges, immunoglobulin E-mediated processes appear exceedingly infrequent. Additionally, discussions regarding monogastric animal research suggest that extremely large exposures could disrupt metabolic pathways, but standard human consumption levels show minimal potential to induce long-term organ dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, the aggregated data highlight considerable methodological disparities in the existing literature and underscore the influence of psychological expectation on reported outcomes. Consequently, MSG does not commonly manifest as a significant allergen in humans, although sporadic intolerance episodes may arise in susceptible individuals. Continued research involving rigorous blinding, standardized protocols, and objective clinical endpoints is recommended to clarify any lingering uncertainties and to inform both regulatory frameworks and consumer guidance. Finally, transparent labeling could help consumers differentiate genuine allergic threats from largely anecdotal or overstated concerns, thereby promoting more balanced discourse around MSG's status in the global food industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":29768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Nutrition Association","volume":" ","pages":"367-376"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Nutrition Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/27697061.2025.2587739","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Monosodium glutamate (MSG) is frequently utilized as a flavor enhancer, yet it remains controversial due to repeated claims linking it to adverse or allergic-like reactions. The purpose of this review was to determine whether MSG meaningfully contributes to actual food allergies, pseudoallergic phenomena, or systemic metabolic effects.

Methods: A systematic evaluation of articles published from 2019 onward, supplemented by foundational studies on MSG safety, was undertaken to assess both clinical and mechanistic evidence.

Results: Findings indicate that anecdotal reports concerning Chinese Restaurant Syndrome (CRS) primarily draw upon uncontrolled research or subjective accounts, whereas double-blind, placebo-controlled investigations rarely confirm consistent symptomatology when realistic dietary doses are administered. Although certain participants display transient intolerance manifestations under high-dose, empty-stomach challenges, immunoglobulin E-mediated processes appear exceedingly infrequent. Additionally, discussions regarding monogastric animal research suggest that extremely large exposures could disrupt metabolic pathways, but standard human consumption levels show minimal potential to induce long-term organ dysfunction.

Conclusion: Overall, the aggregated data highlight considerable methodological disparities in the existing literature and underscore the influence of psychological expectation on reported outcomes. Consequently, MSG does not commonly manifest as a significant allergen in humans, although sporadic intolerance episodes may arise in susceptible individuals. Continued research involving rigorous blinding, standardized protocols, and objective clinical endpoints is recommended to clarify any lingering uncertainties and to inform both regulatory frameworks and consumer guidance. Finally, transparent labeling could help consumers differentiate genuine allergic threats from largely anecdotal or overstated concerns, thereby promoting more balanced discourse around MSG's status in the global food industry.

谷氨酸钠在食物过敏中的作用及其健康意义。
目的:味精(MSG)经常被用作风味增强剂,但由于一再声称它与不良或过敏样反应有关,它仍然存在争议。本综述的目的是确定味精是否对实际的食物过敏、假过敏现象或全身代谢影响有意义。方法:对2019年以来发表的文章进行系统评估,并补充味精安全性的基础研究,以评估临床和机制证据。结果:研究结果表明,关于中国餐馆综合征(CRS)的轶事报道主要是基于非受控研究或主观描述,而双盲、安慰剂对照调查在实际膳食剂量下很少证实一致的症状。虽然某些参与者在高剂量空腹刺激下表现出短暂的不耐受表现,但免疫球蛋白e介导的过程似乎非常罕见。此外,关于单胃动物研究的讨论表明,极大量的暴露可能会破坏代谢途径,但标准的人类消费水平显示,诱导长期器官功能障碍的可能性很小。结论:总的来说,汇总的数据突出了现有文献中相当大的方法差异,并强调了心理期望对报告结果的影响。因此,味精通常不会在人类中表现为重要的过敏原,尽管易感个体可能会出现零星的不耐受事件。建议继续进行包括严格盲法、标准化方案和客观临床终点的研究,以澄清任何挥之不去的不确定性,并为监管框架和消费者指导提供信息。最后,透明的标签可以帮助消费者区分真正的过敏威胁和大多是传闻或夸大的担忧,从而促进关于味精在全球食品工业中的地位的更平衡的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书