{"title":"The Role of Monosodium Glutamate in Food Allergies and Its Health Implications.","authors":"Maria Zofia Lisiecka","doi":"10.1080/27697061.2025.2587739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Monosodium glutamate (MSG) is frequently utilized as a flavor enhancer, yet it remains controversial due to repeated claims linking it to adverse or allergic-like reactions. The purpose of this review was to determine whether MSG meaningfully contributes to actual food allergies, pseudoallergic phenomena, or systemic metabolic effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic evaluation of articles published from 2019 onward, supplemented by foundational studies on MSG safety, was undertaken to assess both clinical and mechanistic evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings indicate that anecdotal reports concerning Chinese Restaurant Syndrome (CRS) primarily draw upon uncontrolled research or subjective accounts, whereas double-blind, placebo-controlled investigations rarely confirm consistent symptomatology when realistic dietary doses are administered. Although certain participants display transient intolerance manifestations under high-dose, empty-stomach challenges, immunoglobulin E-mediated processes appear exceedingly infrequent. Additionally, discussions regarding monogastric animal research suggest that extremely large exposures could disrupt metabolic pathways, but standard human consumption levels show minimal potential to induce long-term organ dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, the aggregated data highlight considerable methodological disparities in the existing literature and underscore the influence of psychological expectation on reported outcomes. Consequently, MSG does not commonly manifest as a significant allergen in humans, although sporadic intolerance episodes may arise in susceptible individuals. Continued research involving rigorous blinding, standardized protocols, and objective clinical endpoints is recommended to clarify any lingering uncertainties and to inform both regulatory frameworks and consumer guidance. Finally, transparent labeling could help consumers differentiate genuine allergic threats from largely anecdotal or overstated concerns, thereby promoting more balanced discourse around MSG's status in the global food industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":29768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Nutrition Association","volume":" ","pages":"367-376"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Nutrition Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/27697061.2025.2587739","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Monosodium glutamate (MSG) is frequently utilized as a flavor enhancer, yet it remains controversial due to repeated claims linking it to adverse or allergic-like reactions. The purpose of this review was to determine whether MSG meaningfully contributes to actual food allergies, pseudoallergic phenomena, or systemic metabolic effects.
Methods: A systematic evaluation of articles published from 2019 onward, supplemented by foundational studies on MSG safety, was undertaken to assess both clinical and mechanistic evidence.
Results: Findings indicate that anecdotal reports concerning Chinese Restaurant Syndrome (CRS) primarily draw upon uncontrolled research or subjective accounts, whereas double-blind, placebo-controlled investigations rarely confirm consistent symptomatology when realistic dietary doses are administered. Although certain participants display transient intolerance manifestations under high-dose, empty-stomach challenges, immunoglobulin E-mediated processes appear exceedingly infrequent. Additionally, discussions regarding monogastric animal research suggest that extremely large exposures could disrupt metabolic pathways, but standard human consumption levels show minimal potential to induce long-term organ dysfunction.
Conclusion: Overall, the aggregated data highlight considerable methodological disparities in the existing literature and underscore the influence of psychological expectation on reported outcomes. Consequently, MSG does not commonly manifest as a significant allergen in humans, although sporadic intolerance episodes may arise in susceptible individuals. Continued research involving rigorous blinding, standardized protocols, and objective clinical endpoints is recommended to clarify any lingering uncertainties and to inform both regulatory frameworks and consumer guidance. Finally, transparent labeling could help consumers differentiate genuine allergic threats from largely anecdotal or overstated concerns, thereby promoting more balanced discourse around MSG's status in the global food industry.