Jurisdictional movement among people with hepatitis B and C in Australia: implications for national data.

IF 3.4 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jennifer H MacLachlan, Nicole Romero, Stephen B Lambert, Gregory J Dore, Richard T Gray, Jisoo A Kwon, Benjamin Cowie
{"title":"Jurisdictional movement among people with hepatitis B and C in Australia: implications for national data.","authors":"Jennifer H MacLachlan, Nicole Romero, Stephen B Lambert, Gregory J Dore, Richard T Gray, Jisoo A Kwon, Benjamin Cowie","doi":"10.1071/PU25051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives and importance of study Chronic hepatitis B and C are leading causes of liver cancer in Australia, and understanding prevalence, diagnosis, and care uptake is a public health priority in the context of a strategic commitment to elimination. This study aims to estimate the degree of movement between jurisdictions among people with hepatitis B and hepatitis C in Australia, to understand the impact on national notifications data and the implications for modelling of prevalence and diagnosis, and consequently uptake measures. Study type Retrospective cohort study using linked health service provision data. Methods Individuals who received Medicare services restricted to those diagnosed with hepatitis B or hepatitis C (nucleic acid testing or treatment) via Medicare during 2011-2023 were analysed. The proportion who changed jurisdictions and the proportion who had a service in multiple jurisdictions were generated, with sub-analysis by jurisdiction and among priority populations (those born overseas and Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people). Results Among the cohort (n=137,041 hepatitis B; n=252,144 hepatitis C), 9.8% of those with hepatitis B and 15.1% of those with hepatitis C resided in more than one jurisdiction, ranging from 6.7%-33.3% by jurisdiction for hepatitis B and 14.5%-42.8% for hepatitis C. This compared to 10.3% (range 8.0%-28.9%) among the total Australian population. Movement was higher among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people for hepatitis B, with a different pattern by jurisdiction than the total cohort. The proportion who had a hepatitis B or hepatitis C service in multiple jurisdictions was 3.2% and 4.6%, respectively, with similar trends by state and territory. Conclusions Movement among people with hepatitis B and C was highly variable according to jurisdiction. This movement should be accounted for in the use of notifications data according to geographic area, and in assessing national progress towards viral hepatitis elimination goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":45898,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Research & Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PU25051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives and importance of study Chronic hepatitis B and C are leading causes of liver cancer in Australia, and understanding prevalence, diagnosis, and care uptake is a public health priority in the context of a strategic commitment to elimination. This study aims to estimate the degree of movement between jurisdictions among people with hepatitis B and hepatitis C in Australia, to understand the impact on national notifications data and the implications for modelling of prevalence and diagnosis, and consequently uptake measures. Study type Retrospective cohort study using linked health service provision data. Methods Individuals who received Medicare services restricted to those diagnosed with hepatitis B or hepatitis C (nucleic acid testing or treatment) via Medicare during 2011-2023 were analysed. The proportion who changed jurisdictions and the proportion who had a service in multiple jurisdictions were generated, with sub-analysis by jurisdiction and among priority populations (those born overseas and Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people). Results Among the cohort (n=137,041 hepatitis B; n=252,144 hepatitis C), 9.8% of those with hepatitis B and 15.1% of those with hepatitis C resided in more than one jurisdiction, ranging from 6.7%-33.3% by jurisdiction for hepatitis B and 14.5%-42.8% for hepatitis C. This compared to 10.3% (range 8.0%-28.9%) among the total Australian population. Movement was higher among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people for hepatitis B, with a different pattern by jurisdiction than the total cohort. The proportion who had a hepatitis B or hepatitis C service in multiple jurisdictions was 3.2% and 4.6%, respectively, with similar trends by state and territory. Conclusions Movement among people with hepatitis B and C was highly variable according to jurisdiction. This movement should be accounted for in the use of notifications data according to geographic area, and in assessing national progress towards viral hepatitis elimination goals.

澳大利亚乙型和丙型肝炎患者的司法管辖权转移:对国家数据的影响。
在澳大利亚,慢性乙型肝炎和丙型肝炎是导致肝癌的主要原因,了解患病率、诊断和治疗是消除这两种疾病战略承诺背景下的公共卫生优先事项。本研究旨在估计澳大利亚乙型肝炎和丙型肝炎患者在司法管辖区之间的流动程度,以了解对国家通报数据的影响以及对患病率和诊断建模的影响,并因此采取措施。研究类型使用相关卫生服务提供数据的回顾性队列研究。方法分析2011-2023年接受医疗保险服务(仅限于诊断为乙型或丙型肝炎的患者)的个体(核酸检测或治疗)。得出了改变司法管辖区的比例和在多个司法管辖区获得服务的比例,并按司法管辖区和优先人口(海外出生的人和土著和/或托雷斯海峡岛民)进行了次级分析。结果在队列中(n= 137041例乙型肝炎患者;n= 252144例丙型肝炎患者),9.8%的乙型肝炎患者和15.1%的丙型肝炎患者居住在一个以上的司法管辖区,乙型肝炎患者的司法管辖区范围为6.7%-33.3%,丙型肝炎患者的司法管辖区范围为14.5%-42.8%,而澳大利亚总人口的这一比例为10.3%(范围为8.0%-28.9%)。在土著人和托雷斯海峡岛民中,乙型肝炎的迁移率更高,不同地区的迁移模式与总体队列不同。在多个司法管辖区接受乙型或丙型肝炎服务的比例分别为3.2%和4.6%,各州和地区的趋势相似。结论不同地区乙型和丙型肝炎患者的运动情况差异较大。在根据地理区域使用通报数据时,以及在评估实现消除病毒性肝炎目标的国家进展时,应考虑到这一变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health Research & Practice
Public Health Research & Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Public Health Research & Practice is an open-access, quarterly, online journal with a strong focus on the connection between research, policy and practice. It publishes innovative, high-quality papers that inform public health policy and practice, paying particular attention to innovations, data and perspectives from policy and practice. The journal is published by the Sax Institute, a national leader in promoting the use of research evidence in health policy. Formerly known as The NSW Public Health Bulletin, the journal has a long history. It was published by the NSW Ministry of Health for nearly a quarter of a century. Responsibility for its publication transferred to the Sax Institute in 2014, and the journal receives guidance from an expert editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书