Employee experience and well-being at work - from theoretical considerations to practical investigations.

IF 1.6 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Health Psychology Report Pub Date : 2024-10-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5114/hpr/191898
Dorota Molek-Winiarska, Ada Bereś, Jakub Drzewiecki
{"title":"Employee experience and well-being at work - from theoretical considerations to practical investigations.","authors":"Dorota Molek-Winiarska, Ada Bereś, Jakub Drzewiecki","doi":"10.5114/hpr/191898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the article is to show the main approaches in defining employee well-being (EWB) and employee experience (EX), their antecedents and effects within organizations and the relations between these two phenomena. The second objective is to explore human resources (HR) practitioners' knowledge of how to distinguish between the two phenomena and their approach to taking responsibility for implementing and investing in EWB and EX initiatives in organizations.</p><p><strong>Participants and procedure: </strong>Research procedure leveraged computer-assisted web interview technique, where respondents filled out online version of the questionnaire, distributed through the LinkedIn platform. A total of 41 HR experts completed the questionnaire. Respondents represented large companies, mainly managers with more than 10 years of experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There are significant differences between EX and EWB in the literature; however, the boundaries are blurred, especially in the context of their relations with personal and organizational outcomes resulting from increasing or maintaining the two concepts. Practitioners acknowledge the differences between the two constructs, yet the initiatives they deliver address the same goals without considering distinctions. Responsibility for managing and implementing interventions related to EWB and EX is mainly held by one subject - the HR department. Finally, no matter the approach to EX or EWB, most of the investments are focused on vocational skill development, physical health and comfortable working conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite differences in the scientific literature, EWB and EX interpermeate conceptually and influence each other in the organizational environment. This leads to actions that are focused equally on both phenomena without regard to their impact on people and organizations. An in-depth investigation of the mechanisms responsible for creating and maintaining EWB and EX allows to understand the mutual penetrability.</p>","PeriodicalId":44293,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Report","volume":"13 4","pages":"303-316"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12642460/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/hpr/191898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of the article is to show the main approaches in defining employee well-being (EWB) and employee experience (EX), their antecedents and effects within organizations and the relations between these two phenomena. The second objective is to explore human resources (HR) practitioners' knowledge of how to distinguish between the two phenomena and their approach to taking responsibility for implementing and investing in EWB and EX initiatives in organizations.

Participants and procedure: Research procedure leveraged computer-assisted web interview technique, where respondents filled out online version of the questionnaire, distributed through the LinkedIn platform. A total of 41 HR experts completed the questionnaire. Respondents represented large companies, mainly managers with more than 10 years of experience.

Results: There are significant differences between EX and EWB in the literature; however, the boundaries are blurred, especially in the context of their relations with personal and organizational outcomes resulting from increasing or maintaining the two concepts. Practitioners acknowledge the differences between the two constructs, yet the initiatives they deliver address the same goals without considering distinctions. Responsibility for managing and implementing interventions related to EWB and EX is mainly held by one subject - the HR department. Finally, no matter the approach to EX or EWB, most of the investments are focused on vocational skill development, physical health and comfortable working conditions.

Conclusions: Despite differences in the scientific literature, EWB and EX interpermeate conceptually and influence each other in the organizational environment. This leads to actions that are focused equally on both phenomena without regard to their impact on people and organizations. An in-depth investigation of the mechanisms responsible for creating and maintaining EWB and EX allows to understand the mutual penetrability.

Abstract Image

工作中的员工体验和幸福感——从理论考虑到实践调查。
背景:本文的目的是展示定义员工幸福感(EWB)和员工体验(EX)的主要方法,它们在组织内的前因和影响,以及这两种现象之间的关系。第二个目标是探索人力资源从业者如何区分这两种现象的知识,以及他们在组织中负责实施和投资EWB和EX计划的方法。参与者和程序:研究程序利用计算机辅助网络访谈技术,受访者填写在线版本的调查问卷,通过LinkedIn平台分发。共有41位人力资源专家完成了问卷调查。受访者来自大公司,主要是拥有10年以上经验的管理人员。结果:文献中EX与EWB存在显著差异;然而,界限是模糊的,特别是在他们与个人和组织结果的关系背景下,这两个概念的增加或维持。实践者承认这两种结构之间的差异,但是他们交付的计划在不考虑差异的情况下处理相同的目标。管理和实施与EWB和EX相关的干预措施的责任主要由人力资源部门承担。最后,无论采用何种方式实现外向型就业还是外向型就业,大多数投资都集中在职业技能发展、身体健康和舒适的工作条件上。结论:尽管科学文献存在差异,但EWB和EX在概念上相互渗透,并在组织环境中相互影响。这导致行动同样关注这两种现象,而不考虑它们对个人和组织的影响。对负责创建和维护EWB和EX的机制进行深入研究,可以了解它们之间的相互渗透性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Psychology Report
Health Psychology Report PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
15.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书