State-Level Variations in Hypertension Management and Cardiovascular Disease Risks in India: Public Spending on Health and Socioeconomic Inequalities.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Gerontology Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-25 DOI:10.1159/000549706
Kanya Anindya, Yang Zhao, Sukumar Vellakkal, Arokiasamy Perianayagam, Sanghamitra Pati, Tiara Marthias, Mansi Malik, John Tayu Lee
{"title":"State-Level Variations in Hypertension Management and Cardiovascular Disease Risks in India: Public Spending on Health and Socioeconomic Inequalities.","authors":"Kanya Anindya, Yang Zhao, Sukumar Vellakkal, Arokiasamy Perianayagam, Sanghamitra Pati, Tiara Marthias, Mansi Malik, John Tayu Lee","doi":"10.1159/000549706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><p>Introduction: This study aimed to assess the within- and between-states inequality in hypertension management and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk across sociodemographic groups in India and the correlation between states/UTs expenditure on health, hypertension management, and CVD risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized cross-sectional data from 2017/2018 Longitudinal Aging Study in India (LASI), with a total sample of 58,848 respondents aged ≥45 years. Hypertension management was assessed based on hypertension awareness, treatment, and control, while 10-year CVD risk was measured using the 2019 WHO CVD risk. We used multilevel logistic regression models to estimate the socioeconomic inequality in hypertension management and 10-year CVD risk, measured by the relative index of inequality (RII).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Rural areas had a substantially poorer coverage of hypertension awareness, treatment, and control compared with urban areas. Richest socioeconomic groups were more likely to be aware of their hypertensive status (RII 1.28, 95% CI: 1.16-1.42), receive antihypertensive treatment (RII 1.47, 95% CI: 1.28-1.69), have their blood pressure controlled (RII 1.60, 95% CI: 1.34-1.90), and have 10-year CVD risk <10% (1.06, 95% CI: 1.01-1.12) compared to the poorest. The variance partition coefficient ranged from 1.5% for 10-year CVD risk to 9.9% for hypertension control. There was no significant correlation between socioeconomic inequality in hypertension management, 10-year CVD risk, and the per capita public health expenditure of states/UTs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Differences in state-level health system capacity may disproportionately affect socioeconomically disadvantaged populations, underscoring the need for more equitable hypertension management and cardiovascular health strategies across India. </p>.</p>","PeriodicalId":12662,"journal":{"name":"Gerontology","volume":" ","pages":"95-109"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12788826/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000549706","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to assess the within- and between-states inequality in hypertension management and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk across sociodemographic groups in India and the correlation between states/UTs expenditure on health, hypertension management, and CVD risk.

Methods: This study utilized cross-sectional data from 2017/2018 Longitudinal Aging Study in India (LASI), with a total sample of 58,848 respondents aged ≥45 years. Hypertension management was assessed based on hypertension awareness, treatment, and control, while 10-year CVD risk was measured using the 2019 WHO CVD risk. We used multilevel logistic regression models to estimate the socioeconomic inequality in hypertension management and 10-year CVD risk, measured by the relative index of inequality (RII).

Results: Rural areas had a substantially poorer coverage of hypertension awareness, treatment, and control compared with urban areas. Richest socioeconomic groups were more likely to be aware of their hypertensive status (RII 1.28, 95% CI: 1.16-1.42), receive antihypertensive treatment (RII 1.47, 95% CI: 1.28-1.69), have their blood pressure controlled (RII 1.60, 95% CI: 1.34-1.90), and have 10-year CVD risk <10% (1.06, 95% CI: 1.01-1.12) compared to the poorest. The variance partition coefficient ranged from 1.5% for 10-year CVD risk to 9.9% for hypertension control. There was no significant correlation between socioeconomic inequality in hypertension management, 10-year CVD risk, and the per capita public health expenditure of states/UTs.

Conclusion: Differences in state-level health system capacity may disproportionately affect socioeconomically disadvantaged populations, underscoring the need for more equitable hypertension management and cardiovascular health strategies across India.

.

印度各邦在高血压管理和心血管疾病风险方面的差异:公共支出对健康和不平等的影响。
简介:本研究旨在评估印度不同社会人口群体在高血压管理和心血管疾病风险方面的邦内和邦间不平等;以及各州/地区在健康、高血压管理和心血管疾病风险方面的支出之间的相关性。方法:本研究利用2017/2018年印度纵向老龄化研究(LASI)的横断面数据,总样本为58,848名年龄≥45岁的受访者。根据高血压意识、治疗和控制来评估高血压管理,而使用2019年世卫组织心血管疾病风险来衡量10年心血管疾病风险。我们使用多水平逻辑回归模型来估计高血压管理和10年心血管疾病风险的社会经济不平等,以相对不平等指数(RII)衡量。结果:与城市地区相比,农村地区对高血压的认识、治疗和控制的覆盖率明显较低。与最贫穷的社会经济群体相比,最富裕的社会经济群体更有可能意识到自己的高血压状况(RII 1.28, 95% CI 1.16-1.42),接受降压治疗(RII 1.47, 95% CI 1.28-1.69),血压得到控制(RII 1.60, 95% CI 1.34-1.90), 10年心血管疾病风险< 10% (1.06,95% CI 1.01-1.12)。VPC范围从10年心血管疾病风险的1.5%到高血压控制的9.9%。高血压管理的社会经济不平等、10年心血管疾病风险与州/ ut的人均公共卫生支出之间没有显著相关性。结论:邦一级卫生系统能力的差异可能会不成比例地影响社会经济上处于不利地位的人群,强调印度需要更公平的高血压管理和心血管健康战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gerontology
Gerontology 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In view of the ever-increasing fraction of elderly people, understanding the mechanisms of aging and age-related diseases has become a matter of urgent necessity. ''Gerontology'', the oldest journal in the field, responds to this need by drawing topical contributions from multiple disciplines to support the fundamental goals of extending active life and enhancing its quality. The range of papers is classified into four sections. In the Clinical Section, the aetiology, pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of agerelated diseases are discussed from a gerontological rather than a geriatric viewpoint. The Experimental Section contains up-to-date contributions from basic gerontological research. Papers dealing with behavioural development and related topics are placed in the Behavioural Science Section. Basic aspects of regeneration in different experimental biological systems as well as in the context of medical applications are dealt with in a special section that also contains information on technological advances for the elderly. Providing a primary source of high-quality papers covering all aspects of aging in humans and animals, ''Gerontology'' serves as an ideal information tool for all readers interested in the topic of aging from a broad perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书