Anomalous self-experience in substance-induced and primary psychotic disorders: a cross-sectional comparative study using the EASE interview.

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Luisa De Risio, Alessio Mosca, Arianna Pasino, Enrico Pompili, Giuseppe Nicolò, Mauro Pettorruso, Giovanni Martinotti
{"title":"Anomalous self-experience in substance-induced and primary psychotic disorders: a cross-sectional comparative study using the EASE interview.","authors":"Luisa De Risio, Alessio Mosca, Arianna Pasino, Enrico Pompili, Giuseppe Nicolò, Mauro Pettorruso, Giovanni Martinotti","doi":"10.1186/s12991-025-00608-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Disturbances of the minimal self, or anomalous self-experiences (ASEs), are increasingly regarded as a core feature of primary psychotic disorders (PPDs). However, it remains unclear whether similar self-disorders are present in substance-induced psychosis (SIP), a condition that often mimics PPDs in its early stages.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aims to compare ASEs between PPD and SIP using the EASE interview, to evaluate the diagnostic specificity of ASEs and determine whether these disturbances are exclusive to primary psychoses or also present in SIP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 54 clinically stable patients were recruited from psychiatric centers in Italy (27 with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD), mean age ≈ 27 years; 27 with substance-induced psychosis, mean age ≈ 28 years).. Diagnoses were established according to DSM-5 criteria. ASEs were assessed using the Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience (EASE) interview, and scores were compared across five experiential domains. Non-parametric statistics and logistic regression were employed to identify domain-specific differences and their diagnostic utility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While total EASE scores did not differ significantly between groups, Domain 4 (Demarcation/Transitivism) was significantly higher in the SIP group (p < .0001, r = .72), contrary to classical phenomenological models that typically associate self-world boundary disturbances with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. In contrast, Domain 2 (Self-awareness and Presence) trended higher in the PPD group (p = .049, r = .27) and Domain 5 (Existential Reorientation) showed a similar trend (p = .098, r = .22)., aligning with classical phenomenological models of schizophrenia. Logistic regression confirmed the predictive value of these domains for group classification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ASEs are not exclusive to PPDs and may also manifest in SIP, particularly in the domain of \"self-world boundary\" disturbances. These findings challenge the assumption that self-disorders are unique to endogenous psychosis and highlight the need for refined phenomenological assessment in early diagnostic work. Longitudinal studies are needed to clarify whether ASEs in SIP represent transient phenomena or prodromal markers of schizophrenia.</p>","PeriodicalId":7942,"journal":{"name":"Annals of General Psychiatry","volume":"24 1","pages":"72"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12648912/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of General Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12991-025-00608-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Disturbances of the minimal self, or anomalous self-experiences (ASEs), are increasingly regarded as a core feature of primary psychotic disorders (PPDs). However, it remains unclear whether similar self-disorders are present in substance-induced psychosis (SIP), a condition that often mimics PPDs in its early stages.

Objective: The study aims to compare ASEs between PPD and SIP using the EASE interview, to evaluate the diagnostic specificity of ASEs and determine whether these disturbances are exclusive to primary psychoses or also present in SIP.

Methods: A total of 54 clinically stable patients were recruited from psychiatric centers in Italy (27 with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD), mean age ≈ 27 years; 27 with substance-induced psychosis, mean age ≈ 28 years).. Diagnoses were established according to DSM-5 criteria. ASEs were assessed using the Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience (EASE) interview, and scores were compared across five experiential domains. Non-parametric statistics and logistic regression were employed to identify domain-specific differences and their diagnostic utility.

Results: While total EASE scores did not differ significantly between groups, Domain 4 (Demarcation/Transitivism) was significantly higher in the SIP group (p < .0001, r = .72), contrary to classical phenomenological models that typically associate self-world boundary disturbances with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. In contrast, Domain 2 (Self-awareness and Presence) trended higher in the PPD group (p = .049, r = .27) and Domain 5 (Existential Reorientation) showed a similar trend (p = .098, r = .22)., aligning with classical phenomenological models of schizophrenia. Logistic regression confirmed the predictive value of these domains for group classification.

Conclusion: ASEs are not exclusive to PPDs and may also manifest in SIP, particularly in the domain of "self-world boundary" disturbances. These findings challenge the assumption that self-disorders are unique to endogenous psychosis and highlight the need for refined phenomenological assessment in early diagnostic work. Longitudinal studies are needed to clarify whether ASEs in SIP represent transient phenomena or prodromal markers of schizophrenia.

Abstract Image

物质诱导和原发性精神障碍的异常自我体验:使用EASE访谈的横断面比较研究。
背景:最小自我障碍或异常自我体验(ASEs)越来越被认为是原发性精神障碍(PPDs)的核心特征。然而,目前尚不清楚是否类似的自我障碍存在于物质诱发性精神病(SIP)中,这种情况在其早期阶段通常与ppd相似。目的:本研究旨在通过EASE访谈比较PPD和SIP之间的ase,评估ase的诊断特异性,并确定这些障碍是原发精神病独有的还是也存在于SIP中。方法:从意大利精神病学中心招募54例临床稳定的患者(27例患有精神分裂症谱系障碍(SSD),平均年龄≈27岁;药物性精神病27例,平均年龄≈28岁。根据DSM-5标准进行诊断。使用异常自我体验检查(EASE)访谈对异常自我体验进行评估,并比较五个体验域的得分。采用非参数统计和逻辑回归来确定特定领域的差异及其诊断效用。结果:虽然各组之间的EASE总分差异不显著,但SIP组的4域(划分/过渡主义)显著高于SIP组(p)。结论:as并非ppd独有,也可能在SIP中表现出来,特别是在“自我世界边界”干扰领域。这些发现挑战了自我障碍是内源性精神病所特有的假设,并强调了在早期诊断工作中改进现象学评估的必要性。需要进行纵向研究来阐明SIP中的ase是精神分裂症的短暂现象还是前驱标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.70%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of General Psychiatry considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychiatry, including neuroscience and psychological medicine. Both basic and clinical neuroscience contributions are encouraged. Annals of General Psychiatry emphasizes a biopsychosocial approach to illness and health and strongly supports and follows the principles of evidence-based medicine. As an open access journal, Annals of General Psychiatry facilitates the worldwide distribution of high quality psychiatry and mental health research. The journal considers submissions on a wide range of topics including, but not limited to, psychopharmacology, forensic psychiatry, psychotic disorders, psychiatric genetics, and mood and anxiety disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书