Patient-reported symptoms at follow-up after a ureteral colic attack as an indication of spontaneous stone passage/remaining ureteral stone or presence of urinary tract obstruction.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Acta radiologica Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-25 DOI:10.1177/02841851251393798
Klara Sahlén, Pär Dahlman, Per Liss, Maria Lönnemark, Monica Segelsjö, Anders Magnusson
{"title":"Patient-reported symptoms at follow-up after a ureteral colic attack as an indication of spontaneous stone passage/remaining ureteral stone or presence of urinary tract obstruction.","authors":"Klara Sahlén, Pär Dahlman, Per Liss, Maria Lönnemark, Monica Segelsjö, Anders Magnusson","doi":"10.1177/02841851251393798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundPatient-reported symptoms is considered a possible alternative to computed tomography (CT) for the evaluation of remaining ureteral stones at follow-up after a ureteral colic attack.PurposeTo investigate patient-reported symptoms at follow-up after a ureteral colic attack in patients with a remaining ureteral stone and to assess the association of symptoms with degree of urinary obstruction.Material and MethodsThis was a prospective study of 81 patients (68 men, 13 women; mean age = 59 years; age range = 23-88 years) referred for a follow-up CT after a ureteral colic attack with a remaining unilateral ureteral stone. A dynamic enhanced scan defined urinary obstruction. Stone size was the largest diameter of three multiplanar reformatations (axial, coronal, sagittal). Stone location was registered as proximal, mid-ureter or distal. Symptoms were registered in standardized questionnaires by the patient at the time of the follow-up.ResultsIn total, 43/81 (53%) patients reported symptoms. Obstruction of any degree was present in 16 (20%) patients. In 7 (100%) patients with moderate-severe obstruction reported discomfort attributed to the stone. In patients with mild obstruction, 5 (56%) reported discomfort; in patients with no obstruction, 31 (48%) reported discomfort.ConclusionAlmost half of the patients at follow-up reported no discomfort despite having a stone in the ureter. A significant association was found between a higher degree of obstruction and reported symptoms. Asymptomatic stones and silent partial obstruction could be missed based on reported symptoms. Imaging is still required to evaluate stone passage at follow-up after a ureteral colic attack.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"151-156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12886557/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851251393798","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundPatient-reported symptoms is considered a possible alternative to computed tomography (CT) for the evaluation of remaining ureteral stones at follow-up after a ureteral colic attack.PurposeTo investigate patient-reported symptoms at follow-up after a ureteral colic attack in patients with a remaining ureteral stone and to assess the association of symptoms with degree of urinary obstruction.Material and MethodsThis was a prospective study of 81 patients (68 men, 13 women; mean age = 59 years; age range = 23-88 years) referred for a follow-up CT after a ureteral colic attack with a remaining unilateral ureteral stone. A dynamic enhanced scan defined urinary obstruction. Stone size was the largest diameter of three multiplanar reformatations (axial, coronal, sagittal). Stone location was registered as proximal, mid-ureter or distal. Symptoms were registered in standardized questionnaires by the patient at the time of the follow-up.ResultsIn total, 43/81 (53%) patients reported symptoms. Obstruction of any degree was present in 16 (20%) patients. In 7 (100%) patients with moderate-severe obstruction reported discomfort attributed to the stone. In patients with mild obstruction, 5 (56%) reported discomfort; in patients with no obstruction, 31 (48%) reported discomfort.ConclusionAlmost half of the patients at follow-up reported no discomfort despite having a stone in the ureter. A significant association was found between a higher degree of obstruction and reported symptoms. Asymptomatic stones and silent partial obstruction could be missed based on reported symptoms. Imaging is still required to evaluate stone passage at follow-up after a ureteral colic attack.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

患者在输尿管绞痛发作后随访时报告的症状作为自发性结石通过/输尿管结石残留或尿路梗阻的指征。
背景:在输尿管绞痛发作后的随访中,患者报告的症状被认为是计算机断层扫描(CT)评估剩余输尿管结石的可能替代方法。目的探讨输尿管结石残留患者在输尿管绞痛发作后的随访中患者报告的症状,并评估症状与尿路梗阻程度的关系。材料和方法这是一项前瞻性研究,81例患者(68例男性,13例女性,平均年龄= 59岁,年龄范围= 23-88岁)在输尿管绞痛发作并伴有单侧输尿管结石后接受随访CT。动态增强扫描诊断尿路梗阻。三次多平面重构(轴状、冠状、矢状)中,结石直径最大。结石位置记录为输尿管近端、中端或远端。在随访时,患者在标准化问卷中记录了症状。结果81例患者中有43例(53%)出现症状。16例(20%)患者存在不同程度的梗阻。7例(100%)中重度梗阻患者报告结石引起的不适。在轻度梗阻患者中,5例(56%)报告不适;在没有梗阻的患者中,31例(48%)报告不适。结论近一半的患者在随访中报告尽管输尿管有结石,但没有不适。发现较高程度的梗阻与报告的症状之间存在显著关联。根据所报告的症状,可能会遗漏无症状的结石和无症状的部分梗阻。在输尿管绞痛发作后的随访中,仍然需要影像学来评估结石的通过。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书