Wasim Awal , Randy Bindra , Giuseppe Pastore , Lawrence Baartz , Alastair Quinn , David Saxby
{"title":"Evaluation of calcium phosphate bone cement in augmenting screw hole defects in the ulna: A biomechanical study","authors":"Wasim Awal , Randy Bindra , Giuseppe Pastore , Lawrence Baartz , Alastair Quinn , David Saxby","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Following ulnar shortening osteotomies, plates are often removed due to discomfort or irritation. The screw holes left after plate removal act as stress risers and predispose the bone to fracture. To our knowledge, calcium phosphate cement (CPC) is yet to be investigated for its use in reinforcing screw holes. The aim of this study was to determine if filling screw holes with CPC in a synthetic anatomical ulna model will improve its immediate mechanical strength compared to leaving screw holes unfilled.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eighteen synthetic anatomical ulna models were randomly divided into three equal groups. The control group was left unaltered, the drilled group received six 3.5 mm screw holes, and the CPC group had the six 3.5 mm screw holes filled with CPC. All bones were subjected to torsional loading until failure. Peak torque at failure, stiffness, and energy absorption were measured.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Compared to the drilled group, the CPC group had greater peak torque, stiffness, and energy absorption. Group effects on peak torque and stiffness were moderate (eta squared = 0.12 for both) but did not reach statistical significance (<em>p</em> = 0.37 and 0.38, respectively). A statistically significant group effect was found for energy absorption (<em>p</em> < 0.001); but <em>post-hoc</em> analysis revealed no difference between the drilled and CPC groups.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Effect sizes suggest CPC may improve mechanical performance, albeit modestly. Clinicians may consider using CPC for reinforcing screw holes after plate removal in bones like the ulna when refracture is of concern.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50992,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biomechanics","volume":"131 ","pages":"Article 106717"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003325002906","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Following ulnar shortening osteotomies, plates are often removed due to discomfort or irritation. The screw holes left after plate removal act as stress risers and predispose the bone to fracture. To our knowledge, calcium phosphate cement (CPC) is yet to be investigated for its use in reinforcing screw holes. The aim of this study was to determine if filling screw holes with CPC in a synthetic anatomical ulna model will improve its immediate mechanical strength compared to leaving screw holes unfilled.
Methods
Eighteen synthetic anatomical ulna models were randomly divided into three equal groups. The control group was left unaltered, the drilled group received six 3.5 mm screw holes, and the CPC group had the six 3.5 mm screw holes filled with CPC. All bones were subjected to torsional loading until failure. Peak torque at failure, stiffness, and energy absorption were measured.
Findings
Compared to the drilled group, the CPC group had greater peak torque, stiffness, and energy absorption. Group effects on peak torque and stiffness were moderate (eta squared = 0.12 for both) but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.37 and 0.38, respectively). A statistically significant group effect was found for energy absorption (p < 0.001); but post-hoc analysis revealed no difference between the drilled and CPC groups.
Interpretation
Effect sizes suggest CPC may improve mechanical performance, albeit modestly. Clinicians may consider using CPC for reinforcing screw holes after plate removal in bones like the ulna when refracture is of concern.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Biomechanics is an international multidisciplinary journal of biomechanics with a focus on medical and clinical applications of new knowledge in the field.
The science of biomechanics helps explain the causes of cell, tissue, organ and body system disorders, and supports clinicians in the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of treatment methods and technologies. Clinical Biomechanics aims to strengthen the links between laboratory and clinic by publishing cutting-edge biomechanics research which helps to explain the causes of injury and disease, and which provides evidence contributing to improved clinical management.
A rigorous peer review system is employed and every attempt is made to process and publish top-quality papers promptly.
Clinical Biomechanics explores all facets of body system, organ, tissue and cell biomechanics, with an emphasis on medical and clinical applications of the basic science aspects. The role of basic science is therefore recognized in a medical or clinical context. The readership of the journal closely reflects its multi-disciplinary contents, being a balance of scientists, engineers and clinicians.
The contents are in the form of research papers, brief reports, review papers and correspondence, whilst special interest issues and supplements are published from time to time.
Disciplines covered include biomechanics and mechanobiology at all scales, bioengineering and use of tissue engineering and biomaterials for clinical applications, biophysics, as well as biomechanical aspects of medical robotics, ergonomics, physical and occupational therapeutics and rehabilitation.