Patient-Reported Outcomes of Anterior Digastric Myectomy in Deep Plane Facelift and Neck Lift Surgery.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Alan J Gray, Sidney J Starkman
{"title":"Patient-Reported Outcomes of Anterior Digastric Myectomy in Deep Plane Facelift and Neck Lift Surgery.","authors":"Alan J Gray, Sidney J Starkman","doi":"10.1177/26893614251399222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aesthetic neck contouring is a key component to facial rejuvenation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare patient-reported symptoms after deep neck lift with versus without anterior digastric (AD) myectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort of patients undergoing neck lift (July 2020-December 2024) grouped by AD myectomy status. Primary outcomes were dysphagia, dysarthria, throat pain, and neck tightness lasting >1 month. Secondary outcomes included hematoma, seroma, scar revision, skin breakdown, and revision neck lift.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 452 patients with >3 months' follow-up, 142 had no AD myectomy, and 310 had AD myectomy. Median age was 59 (53-65) versus 60 (54-64) years; 92% were female (89% vs. 94%). Median follow-up was 9.60 (4.53-16.69) versus 9.39 (5.78-13.35) months. Combination procedures were performed in 72% (59% vs. 78%), and submandibular gland reduction in 30.5% (0% vs. 44.5%). Primary complaints occurred in 9.9% (95% CI: 6.0-15.9) versus 10.0% (95% CI: 7.1-13.8) with no significant differences in dysphagia, dysarthria, or throat pain. Neck tightness was lower with AD myectomy: 4.8% versus 13.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.0015. Revision neck lift was lower with AD myectomy: 3.9% versus 9.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.027.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AD myectomy does not increase functional complications and reduces neck tightness and revision surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"361-367"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26893614251399222","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Aesthetic neck contouring is a key component to facial rejuvenation.

Objective: To compare patient-reported symptoms after deep neck lift with versus without anterior digastric (AD) myectomy.

Methods: Retrospective cohort of patients undergoing neck lift (July 2020-December 2024) grouped by AD myectomy status. Primary outcomes were dysphagia, dysarthria, throat pain, and neck tightness lasting >1 month. Secondary outcomes included hematoma, seroma, scar revision, skin breakdown, and revision neck lift.

Results: Of 452 patients with >3 months' follow-up, 142 had no AD myectomy, and 310 had AD myectomy. Median age was 59 (53-65) versus 60 (54-64) years; 92% were female (89% vs. 94%). Median follow-up was 9.60 (4.53-16.69) versus 9.39 (5.78-13.35) months. Combination procedures were performed in 72% (59% vs. 78%), and submandibular gland reduction in 30.5% (0% vs. 44.5%). Primary complaints occurred in 9.9% (95% CI: 6.0-15.9) versus 10.0% (95% CI: 7.1-13.8) with no significant differences in dysphagia, dysarthria, or throat pain. Neck tightness was lower with AD myectomy: 4.8% versus 13.4%, p = 0.0015. Revision neck lift was lower with AD myectomy: 3.9% versus 9.2%, p = 0.027.

Conclusions: AD myectomy does not increase functional complications and reduces neck tightness and revision surgery.

患者报告的二腹肌前切除术在深度平面面部提升和颈部提升手术中的结果。
背景:美观的颈部轮廓是面部年轻化的关键组成部分。目的:比较患者报告的深颈部提升与未前二腹肌(AD)切除术后的症状。方法:对接受颈部提升术的患者(2020年7月- 2024年12月)进行回顾性队列研究,按AD肌瘤切除术情况分组。主要结局为持续10 ~ 10个月的吞咽困难、构音障碍、咽喉疼痛和颈部紧绷。次要结局包括血肿、血肿、疤痕修复、皮肤破裂和颈部提升修复。结果:452例患者随访3个月,142例未行AD肌瘤切除术,310例行AD肌瘤切除术。中位年龄59岁(53-65岁)vs 60岁(54-64岁);92%为女性(89%对94%)。中位随访时间分别为9.60(4.53-16.69)个月和9.39(5.78-13.35)个月。联合手术占72%(59%对78%),下颌腺复位占30.5%(0%对44.5%)。原发性主诉发生率为9.9% (95% CI: 6.0-15.9)对10.0% (95% CI: 7.1-13.8),在吞咽困难、构音障碍或喉咙痛方面无显著差异。AD肌瘤切除术后颈紧度降低:4.8%比13.4%,p = 0.0015。AD肌瘤切除术后颈部提升率较低:3.9%对9.2%,p = 0.027。结论:AD肌瘤切除术不会增加功能并发症,减少颈部紧绷和翻修手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
30.00%
发文量
159
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书