Designing and evaluating a technology-based intervention to address deep ambivalence about COVID vaccination among people who inject drugs.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
I D Aronson, R Quiles, A Cramer, C Fong, B Gibson, B Vargas-Estrella, S Stern, A S Bennett
{"title":"Designing and evaluating a technology-based intervention to address deep ambivalence about COVID vaccination among people who inject drugs.","authors":"I D Aronson, R Quiles, A Cramer, C Fong, B Gibson, B Vargas-Estrella, S Stern, A S Bennett","doi":"10.1093/her/cyaf052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To encourage people who inject drugs to vaccinate against COVID-19, our research team collaborated with a harm reduction organization in East Harlem to create a multilevel, technology-based intervention that combined a brief (<6 minute) educational video with pre-post-test items measuring the likelihood of vaccination, attitudes, and vaccine-related heath literacy. A total of 545 participants completed the intervention; 45 vaccinated at the end of their first study visit. The remaining 500 were randomly assigned to two groups that were sent different text message configurations to examine which more effectively encouraged follow-up vaccination. The intervention group received Multimedia Messaging Service text messages featuring combinations of words and images, similar to frames of a graphic novel; the control group received Short Message Service texts consisting solely of words. Among those who did not vaccinate at first visit, 26 (7 intervention group and 19 control) vaccinated at follow-up. Greater vaccine-related knowledge (e.g. the vaccine does not contain a live virus) and positive vaccine attitudes were significantly associated with post intervention vaccination. Misinformation and misconceptions (i.e. vaccines are population control; vaccination is only for people who are already sick) emerged as powerful barriers to vaccination. Further research is warranted to address other forms of vaccine hesitancy among additional high-risk populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48236,"journal":{"name":"Health Education Research","volume":"40 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12642696/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyaf052","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To encourage people who inject drugs to vaccinate against COVID-19, our research team collaborated with a harm reduction organization in East Harlem to create a multilevel, technology-based intervention that combined a brief (<6 minute) educational video with pre-post-test items measuring the likelihood of vaccination, attitudes, and vaccine-related heath literacy. A total of 545 participants completed the intervention; 45 vaccinated at the end of their first study visit. The remaining 500 were randomly assigned to two groups that were sent different text message configurations to examine which more effectively encouraged follow-up vaccination. The intervention group received Multimedia Messaging Service text messages featuring combinations of words and images, similar to frames of a graphic novel; the control group received Short Message Service texts consisting solely of words. Among those who did not vaccinate at first visit, 26 (7 intervention group and 19 control) vaccinated at follow-up. Greater vaccine-related knowledge (e.g. the vaccine does not contain a live virus) and positive vaccine attitudes were significantly associated with post intervention vaccination. Misinformation and misconceptions (i.e. vaccines are population control; vaccination is only for people who are already sick) emerged as powerful barriers to vaccination. Further research is warranted to address other forms of vaccine hesitancy among additional high-risk populations.

设计和评估基于技术的干预措施,以解决注射吸毒者对COVID疫苗接种的深层矛盾心理。
为了鼓励注射毒品的人接种COVID-19疫苗,我们的研究团队与东哈莱姆的一个减少伤害组织合作,创建了一种多层次、基于技术的干预措施,该干预措施结合了简短的(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Publishing original, refereed papers, Health Education Research deals with all the vital issues involved in health education and promotion worldwide - providing a valuable link between the health education research and practice communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书