Hearing Aid Amplification Schemes Adjusted to Tinnitus Pitch: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.8 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Jose L Santacruz, Emile de Kleine, Pim van Dijk
{"title":"Hearing Aid Amplification Schemes Adjusted to Tinnitus Pitch: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Jose L Santacruz, Emile de Kleine, Pim van Dijk","doi":"10.3390/audiolres15060143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Hearing aids can be used as a treatment for tinnitus. There are indications that this treatment is most effective when the tinnitus pitch falls in the frequency range of amplification of the hearing aid. Then, the hearing aid provides masking of the tinnitus. Alternatively, it has been suggested that a gap in the amplification around the tinnitus pitch would engage lateral inhibition and thereby reduce the tinnitus. <b>Methods</b>: To test these ideas, we conducted a randomized controlled trial. Patients were fitted with hearing aids using three different amplification schemes: (1) standard amplification according to the NAL-NL2 prescription procedure, (2) boosted amplification at the tinnitus frequency to enhance tinnitus masking, and (3) notch-filtered amplification at the tinnitus frequency to engage lateral inhibition and suppress tinnitus. The goal was to compare the boosted and notched amplification schemes to standard amplification. The primary outcome measure was tinnitus handicap as measured by the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI). The trial was designed as a double-blind Latin square balanced crossover study. Eighteen tinnitus patients with moderate hearing loss were included. All of them were experienced hearing aid users. After two weeks of initial adaptation to the new hearing aids with standard settings, each setting was tried for four weeks. <b>Results</b>: There was an average reduction of 6.9 points on the TFI score after the adaptation phase, possibly due to a placebo effect. The TFI score did not differ significantly from the standard setting after using the notched or the boosted settings. Although notched amplification performed better than boosted amplification, this difference did not reach the clinical significance level. Regardless of the TFI outcomes, most participants had an individual preference for a particular setting. This preference was approximately uniformly distributed across the three amplification schemes. <b>Conclusions</b>: Notch-filtered and boosted amplification did not provide better tinnitus suppression than standard amplification. The individual preferences highlighted the importance of tailor-made approaches to hearing aid amplification in clinical practice. Further studies should explore the differences among patient's tinnitus and their preference for a hearing aid setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":44133,"journal":{"name":"Audiology Research","volume":"15 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12641821/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres15060143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Hearing aids can be used as a treatment for tinnitus. There are indications that this treatment is most effective when the tinnitus pitch falls in the frequency range of amplification of the hearing aid. Then, the hearing aid provides masking of the tinnitus. Alternatively, it has been suggested that a gap in the amplification around the tinnitus pitch would engage lateral inhibition and thereby reduce the tinnitus. Methods: To test these ideas, we conducted a randomized controlled trial. Patients were fitted with hearing aids using three different amplification schemes: (1) standard amplification according to the NAL-NL2 prescription procedure, (2) boosted amplification at the tinnitus frequency to enhance tinnitus masking, and (3) notch-filtered amplification at the tinnitus frequency to engage lateral inhibition and suppress tinnitus. The goal was to compare the boosted and notched amplification schemes to standard amplification. The primary outcome measure was tinnitus handicap as measured by the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI). The trial was designed as a double-blind Latin square balanced crossover study. Eighteen tinnitus patients with moderate hearing loss were included. All of them were experienced hearing aid users. After two weeks of initial adaptation to the new hearing aids with standard settings, each setting was tried for four weeks. Results: There was an average reduction of 6.9 points on the TFI score after the adaptation phase, possibly due to a placebo effect. The TFI score did not differ significantly from the standard setting after using the notched or the boosted settings. Although notched amplification performed better than boosted amplification, this difference did not reach the clinical significance level. Regardless of the TFI outcomes, most participants had an individual preference for a particular setting. This preference was approximately uniformly distributed across the three amplification schemes. Conclusions: Notch-filtered and boosted amplification did not provide better tinnitus suppression than standard amplification. The individual preferences highlighted the importance of tailor-made approaches to hearing aid amplification in clinical practice. Further studies should explore the differences among patient's tinnitus and their preference for a hearing aid setting.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

根据耳鸣音高调整助听器放大方案:一项随机对照试验。
背景/目的:助听器可以作为耳鸣的一种治疗手段。有迹象表明,当耳鸣音高落在助听器放大的频率范围内时,这种治疗最有效。然后,助听器可以掩盖耳鸣。另外,有人建议在耳鸣音高周围的放大间隙会参与侧向抑制,从而减少耳鸣。方法:为了验证这些观点,我们进行了一项随机对照试验。患者使用三种不同的放大方案配戴助听器:(1)根据NAL-NL2处方程序进行标准放大,(2)在耳鸣频率处增强放大以增强耳鸣掩蔽,(3)在耳鸣频率处进行凹迹滤波放大以进行侧抑制并抑制耳鸣。目的是比较升压和陷波放大方案与标准放大。主要结局指标是耳鸣功能指数(TFI)衡量的耳鸣障碍。本试验设计为双盲拉丁方平衡交叉研究。纳入18例中度听力损失的耳鸣患者。他们都是有经验的助听器使用者。在对标准设置的新助听器进行了两周的初步适应后,每种设置都进行了四周的尝试。结果:在适应阶段后,TFI评分平均下降6.9分,可能是由于安慰剂效应。在使用缺口或增强设置后,TFI评分与标准设置没有显着差异。虽然缺口扩增优于增强扩增,但这种差异没有达到临床意义水平。无论TFI结果如何,大多数参与者都对特定环境有个人偏好。这种偏好在三种扩增方案中近似均匀分布。结论:陷波滤波和增强放大对耳鸣的抑制效果不如标准放大。个人偏好突出了在临床实践中定制助听器放大方法的重要性。进一步的研究应探讨患者耳鸣的差异和他们对助听器设置的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Audiology Research
Audiology Research AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
56
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Audiology Research is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant scientific researches related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear that can be used by clinicians, scientists and specialists to improve understanding and treatment of patients with audiological and neurotological disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书