Investigating Prospective Memory Processes: ERP Evidence from Novel Semantic Judgment Tasks.

IF 2.6 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Neuroscience Insights Pub Date : 2025-11-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26331055251393541
Eliza Baby, Shraddha A Shende, Sally Grace Rogers, Natalia Rzepa, Raksha A Mudar
{"title":"Investigating Prospective Memory Processes: ERP Evidence from Novel Semantic Judgment Tasks.","authors":"Eliza Baby, Shraddha A Shende, Sally Grace Rogers, Natalia Rzepa, Raksha A Mudar","doi":"10.1177/26331055251393541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prospective memory (PM), the ability to plan and execute intentions in the future, plays a critical role in managing everyday tasks. A gap exists in our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying PM retrieval based on semantic judgment, particularly when using picture-based stimuli. The current study tested 2 novel picture-based semantic-judgment PM tasks: Animal-cued Prospective Retrieval Task (Ac-PRT) and Object-cued Prospective Retrieval Task (Oc-PRT), designed to investigate PM processes involved in intention formation (Cue trials), intention retention (Ongoing trials), and intention retrieval (PM Retrieval trials). Twenty-three young adults, aged 18 to 30 years, completed the tasks while EEG data were recorded. Behavioral results showed that participants responded more slowly during Ongoing trials compared to Cue and PM Retrieval trials and were less accurate during PM Retrieval trials. Additionally, between the tasks, responses were faster and more accurate in Ac-PRT than in Oc-PRT during both Ongoing and PM Retrieval trials. ERP analyses revealed distinct neural signatures across trial types, particularly in P2, N2, N4, and Parietal Positivity (PP) components in both tasks. Additionally, task-specific differences were observed during the PM Retrieval trials in P2, N4, and PP amplitudes and in PP amplitude during the Ongoing trials. These findings demonstrate that the 2 tasks effectively dissociated core PM processes and showed category-specific differences in behavioral and neural mechanisms, offering a robust framework for future investigations of PM in aging and clinical populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":36527,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience Insights","volume":"20 ","pages":"26331055251393541"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12639234/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26331055251393541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prospective memory (PM), the ability to plan and execute intentions in the future, plays a critical role in managing everyday tasks. A gap exists in our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying PM retrieval based on semantic judgment, particularly when using picture-based stimuli. The current study tested 2 novel picture-based semantic-judgment PM tasks: Animal-cued Prospective Retrieval Task (Ac-PRT) and Object-cued Prospective Retrieval Task (Oc-PRT), designed to investigate PM processes involved in intention formation (Cue trials), intention retention (Ongoing trials), and intention retrieval (PM Retrieval trials). Twenty-three young adults, aged 18 to 30 years, completed the tasks while EEG data were recorded. Behavioral results showed that participants responded more slowly during Ongoing trials compared to Cue and PM Retrieval trials and were less accurate during PM Retrieval trials. Additionally, between the tasks, responses were faster and more accurate in Ac-PRT than in Oc-PRT during both Ongoing and PM Retrieval trials. ERP analyses revealed distinct neural signatures across trial types, particularly in P2, N2, N4, and Parietal Positivity (PP) components in both tasks. Additionally, task-specific differences were observed during the PM Retrieval trials in P2, N4, and PP amplitudes and in PP amplitude during the Ongoing trials. These findings demonstrate that the 2 tasks effectively dissociated core PM processes and showed category-specific differences in behavioral and neural mechanisms, offering a robust framework for future investigations of PM in aging and clinical populations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

前瞻记忆过程研究:来自新语义判断任务的ERP证据。
前瞻记忆(PM),计划和执行未来意图的能力,在管理日常任务中起着至关重要的作用。我们对基于语义判断的PM检索的神经机制的理解存在差距,特别是当使用基于图像的刺激时。本研究测试了两种新的基于图片的语义判断的PM任务:动物提示的前瞻性检索任务(Ac-PRT)和物体提示的前瞻性检索任务(Oc-PRT),旨在研究涉及意图形成(提示试验)、意图保留(正在进行的试验)和意图检索(PM检索试验)的PM过程。23名年龄在18到30岁之间的年轻人完成了这些任务,同时记录了脑电图数据。行为学结果显示,受试者在进行中的反应比提示和PM检索试验更慢,并且在PM检索试验中准确性更低。此外,在正在进行和PM检索试验中,在任务之间,Ac-PRT的反应比Oc-PRT更快,更准确。ERP分析揭示了不同试验类型的不同神经特征,特别是在两个任务中的P2、N2、N4和顶叶积极性(PP)组件。此外,在PM检索试验中,在P2、N4和PP振幅以及正在进行的试验中,在PP振幅上观察到任务特异性差异。这些发现表明,这两个任务有效地分离了核心PM过程,并在行为和神经机制上显示出类别特异性差异,为未来研究老年和临床人群的PM提供了强有力的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroscience Insights
Neuroscience Insights Neuroscience-Neuroscience (all)
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书