{"title":"Rapid microbiological method for analysis of clindamycin-based product potency and its equivalence to UV and HPLC methods","authors":"Isadora Alves Lustosa, Ana Carolina Kogawa","doi":"10.1016/j.mimet.2025.107338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Clindamycin is an antimicrobial sold in capsules, injectable solution, or gel for topical use. Despite its wide use, current official compendia and literature lack microbiological methods to assess its potency, relying mainly on physicochemical assays such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). These techniques, however, do not evaluate the biological activity of the drug. In this context, the present study proposes, for the first time, aimed to develop and validate a rapid microbiological method to determine the potency of clindamycin in capsule form and to compare its results with those obtained from UV and HPLC methods. The method employed <em>Escherichia coli</em> ATCC 8739, BHI broth as the growth medium, and a hydroalcoholic diluent (ethanol: water, 1:1 <em>v</em>/v) for solution preparation. Concentrations tested were 8, 16, and 32 μg mL<sup>−1</sup>, with incubation at 35 ± 2 °C for 4 h under agitation (70 rpm), followed by absorbance measurement at 530 nm. The method exhibited linearity (<em>r</em> > 0.99), selectivity, precision (RSD 3.16 %, 3.57 %, 3.14 %), accuracy (average recovery of 99.47 %), and robustness under most tested conditions, as percentage of inoculum, brand of BHI broth, and volume of BHI broth used in the tube. Statistical comparison confirmed the equivalence of the proposed method with UV and HPLC (F<sub>cal</sub> 0.68 < F<sub>tab</sub> 5.14). This validated microbiological method offers a fast, reliable, and biologically relevant alternative for routine potency determination of clindamycin capsules, addressing a major analytical gap in the quality control of antimicrobial products.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of microbiological methods","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 107338"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of microbiological methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167701225002544","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Clindamycin is an antimicrobial sold in capsules, injectable solution, or gel for topical use. Despite its wide use, current official compendia and literature lack microbiological methods to assess its potency, relying mainly on physicochemical assays such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). These techniques, however, do not evaluate the biological activity of the drug. In this context, the present study proposes, for the first time, aimed to develop and validate a rapid microbiological method to determine the potency of clindamycin in capsule form and to compare its results with those obtained from UV and HPLC methods. The method employed Escherichia coli ATCC 8739, BHI broth as the growth medium, and a hydroalcoholic diluent (ethanol: water, 1:1 v/v) for solution preparation. Concentrations tested were 8, 16, and 32 μg mL−1, with incubation at 35 ± 2 °C for 4 h under agitation (70 rpm), followed by absorbance measurement at 530 nm. The method exhibited linearity (r > 0.99), selectivity, precision (RSD 3.16 %, 3.57 %, 3.14 %), accuracy (average recovery of 99.47 %), and robustness under most tested conditions, as percentage of inoculum, brand of BHI broth, and volume of BHI broth used in the tube. Statistical comparison confirmed the equivalence of the proposed method with UV and HPLC (Fcal 0.68 < Ftab 5.14). This validated microbiological method offers a fast, reliable, and biologically relevant alternative for routine potency determination of clindamycin capsules, addressing a major analytical gap in the quality control of antimicrobial products.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Microbiological Methods publishes scholarly and original articles, notes and review articles. These articles must include novel and/or state-of-the-art methods, or significant improvements to existing methods. Novel and innovative applications of current methods that are validated and useful will also be published. JMM strives for scholarship, innovation and excellence. This demands scientific rigour, the best available methods and technologies, correctly replicated experiments/tests, the inclusion of proper controls, calibrations, and the correct statistical analysis. The presentation of the data must support the interpretation of the method/approach.
All aspects of microbiology are covered, except virology. These include agricultural microbiology, applied and environmental microbiology, bioassays, bioinformatics, biotechnology, biochemical microbiology, clinical microbiology, diagnostics, food monitoring and quality control microbiology, microbial genetics and genomics, geomicrobiology, microbiome methods regardless of habitat, high through-put sequencing methods and analysis, microbial pathogenesis and host responses, metabolomics, metagenomics, metaproteomics, microbial ecology and diversity, microbial physiology, microbial ultra-structure, microscopic and imaging methods, molecular microbiology, mycology, novel mathematical microbiology and modelling, parasitology, plant-microbe interactions, protein markers/profiles, proteomics, pyrosequencing, public health microbiology, radioisotopes applied to microbiology, robotics applied to microbiological methods,rumen microbiology, microbiological methods for space missions and extreme environments, sampling methods and samplers, soil and sediment microbiology, transcriptomics, veterinary microbiology, sero-diagnostics and typing/identification.