Haloperidol versus Ketamine for Managing Acute Agitation in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Sayyed Majid Sadrzadeh, Ala Montazeri, Behrang Rezvani Kakhki, Elnaz Vafadar Moradi
{"title":"Haloperidol versus Ketamine for Managing Acute Agitation in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Sayyed Majid Sadrzadeh, Ala Montazeri, Behrang Rezvani Kakhki, Elnaz Vafadar Moradi","doi":"10.30476/beat.2025.106204.1583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary outcome was the management of acute agitation, as measured by the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS). Secondary outcomes included the incidence of adverse effects and the time to onset of the therapeutic effect.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized clinical trial was conducted between March 2021 and March 2022. Participants were recruited from patients presenting with acute agitation who required pharmacological intervention at Emam Reza and Shahid Hasheminejad hospitals (Mashhad, Iran). Eligible participants were adults aged 18 to 65 years. Using a block randomization method with a block size of four, patients were assigned to receive either 5 mg of intravenous (IV) haloperidol or 2 mg/Kg of IV ketamine. Data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 22).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 120 participants were randomized. The majority were male, comprising 43 (73%) in the haloperidol group and 45 (75%) in the ketamine group. The mean age was 45.42±16.65 in the ketamine group and 48.28±16.75 years in the haloperidol group (<i>p</i>=0.34). In the haloperidol group, the mean admission RASS score was 1.73±0.75, which decreased to 0.07±1.25 post-intervention. In the ketamine group, the mean admission RASS score was 1.58±0.61, which improved to -0.92±1.19 following treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ketamine demonstrated a faster onset of action in managing acute agitation than haloperidol. These findings suggested that ketamine might represent a viable first-line therapeutic option for acutely agitated patients, particularly in clinical scenarios where rapid symptom control is critical.</p>","PeriodicalId":9333,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","volume":"13 4","pages":"215-220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12635519/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/beat.2025.106204.1583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The primary outcome was the management of acute agitation, as measured by the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS). Secondary outcomes included the incidence of adverse effects and the time to onset of the therapeutic effect.

Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted between March 2021 and March 2022. Participants were recruited from patients presenting with acute agitation who required pharmacological intervention at Emam Reza and Shahid Hasheminejad hospitals (Mashhad, Iran). Eligible participants were adults aged 18 to 65 years. Using a block randomization method with a block size of four, patients were assigned to receive either 5 mg of intravenous (IV) haloperidol or 2 mg/Kg of IV ketamine. Data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 22).

Results: A total of 120 participants were randomized. The majority were male, comprising 43 (73%) in the haloperidol group and 45 (75%) in the ketamine group. The mean age was 45.42±16.65 in the ketamine group and 48.28±16.75 years in the haloperidol group (p=0.34). In the haloperidol group, the mean admission RASS score was 1.73±0.75, which decreased to 0.07±1.25 post-intervention. In the ketamine group, the mean admission RASS score was 1.58±0.61, which improved to -0.92±1.19 following treatment.

Conclusion: Ketamine demonstrated a faster onset of action in managing acute agitation than haloperidol. These findings suggested that ketamine might represent a viable first-line therapeutic option for acutely agitated patients, particularly in clinical scenarios where rapid symptom control is critical.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

氟哌啶醇与氯胺酮治疗急诊科急性躁动:一项随机临床试验
目的:主要结局是急性躁动的管理,由里士满躁动-镇静量表(RASS)衡量。次要结局包括不良反应的发生率和治疗效果出现的时间。方法:该随机临床试验于2021年3月至2022年3月进行。参与者是从Emam Reza和Shahid Hasheminejad医院(伊朗马什哈德)出现急性躁动并需要药物干预的患者中招募的。符合条件的参与者是18至65岁的成年人。采用块大小为4的块随机化方法,患者被分配接受5mg静脉(IV)氟哌啶醇或2mg /Kg静脉氯胺酮。数据分析采用SPSS软件(第22版)。结果:共120名参与者被随机化。大多数为男性,氟哌啶醇组43例(73%),氯胺酮组45例(75%)。氯胺酮组平均年龄为45.42±16.65岁,氟哌啶醇组平均年龄为48.28±16.75岁(p=0.34)。氟哌啶醇组入院时平均RASS评分为1.73±0.75,干预后降至0.07±1.25。氯胺酮组入院时平均RASS评分为1.58±0.61,治疗后为-0.92±1.19。结论:氯胺酮在治疗急性躁动方面比氟哌啶醇起效更快。这些发现表明氯胺酮可能是急性激动患者的一线治疗选择,特别是在快速控制症状至关重要的临床情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BEAT: Bulletin of Emergency And Trauma is an international, peer-reviewed, quarterly journal coping with original research contributing to the field of emergency medicine and trauma. BEAT is the official journal of the Trauma Research Center (TRC) of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS), Hungarian Trauma Society (HTS) and Lusitanian Association for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ALTEC/LATES) aiming to be a publication of international repute that serves as a medium for dissemination and exchange of scientific knowledge in the emergency medicine and trauma. The aim of BEAT is to publish original research focusing on practicing and training of emergency medicine and trauma to publish peer-reviewed articles of current international interest in the form of original articles, brief communications, reviews, case reports, clinical images, and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书