{"title":"The Relational Quiddity of Virtual/Digital Reality","authors":"Pierpaolo Donati","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Does the digital/virtual have a reality? For a critical realist, there is no doubt it does, since what can cause something is real. But what kind of reality is it? The article argues that this reality is a relational quidditas. The diffusion of new AI-based technologies increasingly blends analogue and virtual realities, making it essential to understand the causal processes of exchange between them. Digital/virtual reality is constituted by the relationships it designs, and these relationships are increasingly programmable through incentive structures that optimise engagement and control. Using a critical realist lens, the author distinguishes the lifeworld (D1), hybrid/virtual environments (D2) and AI-based technical systems (D3) and analyses the exchanges between them. He argues that current systems excel at simulating first-person experience and signalling sociality, but lack second-person relational reflexivity (mutual respect, responsibility, shared normativity). This absence, combined with the capitalist incentives of platforms, generates asymmetrical ‘companionship’ relationships. that risk degrading relational assets (trust, reciprocity, care). It is necessary to clarify the process of colonization as one through which digital rationalities replace analogue and embodied relationships. Claims about augmented and virtual reality must, however, be evaluated, emphasising their limited and uneven adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":47646,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","volume":"55 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jtsb.70018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jtsb.70018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Does the digital/virtual have a reality? For a critical realist, there is no doubt it does, since what can cause something is real. But what kind of reality is it? The article argues that this reality is a relational quidditas. The diffusion of new AI-based technologies increasingly blends analogue and virtual realities, making it essential to understand the causal processes of exchange between them. Digital/virtual reality is constituted by the relationships it designs, and these relationships are increasingly programmable through incentive structures that optimise engagement and control. Using a critical realist lens, the author distinguishes the lifeworld (D1), hybrid/virtual environments (D2) and AI-based technical systems (D3) and analyses the exchanges between them. He argues that current systems excel at simulating first-person experience and signalling sociality, but lack second-person relational reflexivity (mutual respect, responsibility, shared normativity). This absence, combined with the capitalist incentives of platforms, generates asymmetrical ‘companionship’ relationships. that risk degrading relational assets (trust, reciprocity, care). It is necessary to clarify the process of colonization as one through which digital rationalities replace analogue and embodied relationships. Claims about augmented and virtual reality must, however, be evaluated, emphasising their limited and uneven adoption.
期刊介绍:
The Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour publishes original theoretical and methodological articles that examine the links between social structures and human agency embedded in behavioural practices. The Journal is truly unique in focusing first and foremost on social behaviour, over and above any disciplinary or local framing of such behaviour. In so doing, it embraces a range of theoretical orientations and, by requiring authors to write for a wide audience, the Journal is distinctively interdisciplinary and accessible to readers world-wide in the fields of psychology, sociology and philosophy.