Racial Justice Intervention Research: Reflections, Challenges, and the Road Ahead

IF 3.5 1区 社会学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Alexander Rothman, Peter Mende-Siedlecki, Nao Hagiwara
{"title":"Racial Justice Intervention Research: Reflections, Challenges, and the Road Ahead","authors":"Alexander Rothman,&nbsp;Peter Mende-Siedlecki,&nbsp;Nao Hagiwara","doi":"10.1111/josi.70043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In this closing commentary, we consider the contents of this special issue in full and contemplate the lessons learned in the process of its composition. Ultimately, the goal of racial justice intervention research is to meaningfully and tangibly reduce real-world discrimination and inequity. We offer guidance to researchers in three thematic domains that we hope will be in service of these efforts. In the first section, the second and the third authors reflect on the editorial process—and in particular, note an interplay between reviewers’ uneasiness with the “messiness” of applied work and authors’ tendency to, at times, overpromise about their work's advancement through the Translational Research Framework (TRF). In the second section, we examine the value of the TRF itself, focusing on its utility for formally structuring the development of an intervention, as well as for effectively addressing the challenges that arise when transitioning from highly controlled experimental contexts to unpredictable real-world domains. In the final section, we review the feedback we received from our authors themselves, which highlighted the necessities of interdisciplinary collaboration, building relationships with stakeholders, and flexibility in the face of uncertainty.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Issues","volume":"81 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josi.70043","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this closing commentary, we consider the contents of this special issue in full and contemplate the lessons learned in the process of its composition. Ultimately, the goal of racial justice intervention research is to meaningfully and tangibly reduce real-world discrimination and inequity. We offer guidance to researchers in three thematic domains that we hope will be in service of these efforts. In the first section, the second and the third authors reflect on the editorial process—and in particular, note an interplay between reviewers’ uneasiness with the “messiness” of applied work and authors’ tendency to, at times, overpromise about their work's advancement through the Translational Research Framework (TRF). In the second section, we examine the value of the TRF itself, focusing on its utility for formally structuring the development of an intervention, as well as for effectively addressing the challenges that arise when transitioning from highly controlled experimental contexts to unpredictable real-world domains. In the final section, we review the feedback we received from our authors themselves, which highlighted the necessities of interdisciplinary collaboration, building relationships with stakeholders, and flexibility in the face of uncertainty.

种族正义干预研究:反思、挑战与未来之路
在这篇结束语中,我们将全面审议这一期特刊的内容,并考虑在其编写过程中吸取的教训。最终,种族正义干预研究的目标是有意义地和切实地减少现实世界的歧视和不平等。我们为研究人员提供了三个主题领域的指导,我们希望这些指导将有助于这些努力。在第一部分中,第二和第三位作者对编辑过程进行了反思,并特别注意到审稿人对应用工作“混乱”的不安和作者有时倾向于过度承诺他们的工作通过翻译研究框架(TRF)的进步之间的相互作用。在第二部分,我们检视扶轮基金会本身的价值,聚焦于它在正式建构干预发展的效用,以及在从高度控制的实验环境过渡到不可预测的真实世界领域时,有效地解决所出现的挑战。在最后一部分,我们回顾了从作者那里收到的反馈,这些反馈强调了跨学科合作的必要性,与利益相关者建立关系,以及面对不确定性时的灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Published for The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (SPSSI), the Journal of Social Issues (JSI) brings behavioral and social science theory, empirical evidence, and practice to bear on human and social problems. Each issue of the journal focuses on a single topic - recent issues, for example, have addressed poverty, housing and health; privacy as a social and psychological concern; youth and violence; and the impact of social class on education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书