Capillary trapping in CO2 storage Sites: A traffic light system for preliminary leakage risk assessment

IF 5.5 0 ENERGY & FUELS
Gas Science and Engineering Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jgsce.2025.205807
Mojtaba Ghaedi , Raoof Gholami , Spyros Bellas , Emmanuel Stamatakis
{"title":"Capillary trapping in CO2 storage Sites: A traffic light system for preliminary leakage risk assessment","authors":"Mojtaba Ghaedi ,&nbsp;Raoof Gholami ,&nbsp;Spyros Bellas ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Stamatakis","doi":"10.1016/j.jgsce.2025.205807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Geological storage of CO<sub>2</sub> offers a promising solution to mitigate global warming. In this context, the structural trapping capacity of subsurface formations is crucial. This study investigates the CO<sub>2</sub> storage capacity of shale caprocks under static conditions by estimating the maximum safe column height of the CO<sub>2</sub> plume beneath them. A modified formulation was developed to incorporate capillary pressure contributions from the reservoir rock. Depth-dependent variations in CO<sub>2</sub>–water interfacial tension, wettability, and fluid density were calculated using experimental data and established correlations. Particular attention was given to the effect of total organic content (TOC) on the wettability of caprocks, as some organic-rich source rocks may serve as potential seals for CO<sub>2</sub> storage. Simple and practical equations were proposed to relate wettability to TOC and depth. The results indicate that the capillary pressure of the reservoir rock can often be neglected when estimating CO<sub>2</sub> column height, particularly when the ratio of the reservoir to caprock pore radius exceeds 50. However, neglecting these contributions can lead to overestimations in storage sites when reservoir rock is dense or the caprock is not strongly water-wet. For shale with low TOC (e.g., 0.1 wt%), the optimum storage depth at which the maximum mass of CO<sub>2</sub> can be stored is approximately 1500 m. However, as the TOC of the shale increases, the optimal storage depth and the corresponding mass of CO<sub>2</sub> that can be safely stored decrease significantly. A practical guideline and a traffic light system for preliminary assessment were then proposed to assess the risk of CO<sub>2</sub> capillary leakage. These risks are particularly significant when i) the lowest CO<sub>2</sub> injection point exceeds the safe column height, ii) the gravitational number is less than 0.5, iii) rocks with poor properties hinder horizontal plume propagation beneath the caprock, or iv) CO<sub>2</sub> leakage occurs from underlying formations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100568,"journal":{"name":"Gas Science and Engineering","volume":"145 ","pages":"Article 205807"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gas Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949908925002717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Geological storage of CO2 offers a promising solution to mitigate global warming. In this context, the structural trapping capacity of subsurface formations is crucial. This study investigates the CO2 storage capacity of shale caprocks under static conditions by estimating the maximum safe column height of the CO2 plume beneath them. A modified formulation was developed to incorporate capillary pressure contributions from the reservoir rock. Depth-dependent variations in CO2–water interfacial tension, wettability, and fluid density were calculated using experimental data and established correlations. Particular attention was given to the effect of total organic content (TOC) on the wettability of caprocks, as some organic-rich source rocks may serve as potential seals for CO2 storage. Simple and practical equations were proposed to relate wettability to TOC and depth. The results indicate that the capillary pressure of the reservoir rock can often be neglected when estimating CO2 column height, particularly when the ratio of the reservoir to caprock pore radius exceeds 50. However, neglecting these contributions can lead to overestimations in storage sites when reservoir rock is dense or the caprock is not strongly water-wet. For shale with low TOC (e.g., 0.1 wt%), the optimum storage depth at which the maximum mass of CO2 can be stored is approximately 1500 m. However, as the TOC of the shale increases, the optimal storage depth and the corresponding mass of CO2 that can be safely stored decrease significantly. A practical guideline and a traffic light system for preliminary assessment were then proposed to assess the risk of CO2 capillary leakage. These risks are particularly significant when i) the lowest CO2 injection point exceeds the safe column height, ii) the gravitational number is less than 0.5, iii) rocks with poor properties hinder horizontal plume propagation beneath the caprock, or iv) CO2 leakage occurs from underlying formations.
二氧化碳储存地点的毛细管捕获:初步泄漏风险评估的交通灯系统
二氧化碳的地质储存为缓解全球变暖提供了一个很有希望的解决方案。在这种情况下,地下地层的构造圈闭能力至关重要。本研究通过估算页岩盖层下CO2柱的最大安全柱高,研究了页岩盖层在静态条件下的CO2储存能力。开发了一种改进的公式,以考虑储层岩石的毛管压力贡献。利用实验数据和已建立的相关性,计算了co2 -水界面张力、润湿性和流体密度随深度的变化。总有机含量(TOC)对盖层润湿性的影响受到了特别的关注,因为一些富含有机物的烃源岩可能成为封存二氧化碳的潜在封印物。提出了简单实用的润湿性与TOC和深度的关系式。结果表明,在估算CO2柱高度时,特别是当储层与盖层孔隙半径之比大于50时,储层岩石的毛管压力往往可以被忽略。然而,当储层岩石致密或盖层水湿性不强时,忽略这些贡献可能会导致对储层的高估。对于低TOC(例如,0.1 wt%)的页岩,可以储存最大质量CO2的最佳储存深度约为1500 m。然而,随着页岩TOC的增加,最佳储存深度和相应的可安全储存的CO2质量显著降低。然后提出了一个实用指南和一个初步评估的交通灯系统,以评估二氧化碳毛细管泄漏的风险。当1)最低CO2注入点超过安全柱高,2)重力数小于0.5,3)性质较差的岩石阻碍了盖层下的水平羽流传播,或4)CO2从下伏地层泄漏时,这些风险尤其显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书