Incorporating multimodality and access modal shares in transit station typology based on the node-place model and machine learning: A case study of Chukyo metropolitan area in Japan

IF 4.4 4区 工程技术 Q3 TRANSPORTATION
Journal of Public Transportation Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-18 DOI:10.1016/j.jpubtr.2025.100144
Hyundo Kang , Tomio Miwa
{"title":"Incorporating multimodality and access modal shares in transit station typology based on the node-place model and machine learning: A case study of Chukyo metropolitan area in Japan","authors":"Hyundo Kang ,&nbsp;Tomio Miwa","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubtr.2025.100144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims to develop a typology framework for evaluating stations by incorporating multimodal accessibility, multidimensional features, and interpretability using first-mile access patterns. We conducted an exploratory factor analysis on 45 indicators for the 394 stations in the Chukyo Metropolitan Area (CMA) and identified six factors: local place, accessibility, multimodal place, rail node, morphology, and demographics. Six types were subsequently derived using hierarchical clustering, and the stations were evaluated based on the node-place model. We then interpreted and compared station-level feature importance for access modal shares across clusters using Shapley values for Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) models. The first main finding was that station areas are supported by expanded catchments beyond walking, with bicycle catchments significantly influencing access modes. Second, a multidimensional and specific approach suggested the potential to advance the previous node-place model framework. Third, the active modes and private vehicles shared a macro-level alignment, but revealed conflicting tendencies with respect to access modes. Fourth, active transit accessibility and number of residents within bicycle catchments showed different nonlinear patterns in relation to access modes, which further varied across clusters. Finally, intersection density tended to discourage private-vehicle access at the macro level, although this was not consistent with the cluster hierarchy. This study is expected to advance station typology research and serve as a useful tool for integrated land use and transport planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47173,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Transportation","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100144"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077291X25000293","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to develop a typology framework for evaluating stations by incorporating multimodal accessibility, multidimensional features, and interpretability using first-mile access patterns. We conducted an exploratory factor analysis on 45 indicators for the 394 stations in the Chukyo Metropolitan Area (CMA) and identified six factors: local place, accessibility, multimodal place, rail node, morphology, and demographics. Six types were subsequently derived using hierarchical clustering, and the stations were evaluated based on the node-place model. We then interpreted and compared station-level feature importance for access modal shares across clusters using Shapley values for Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) models. The first main finding was that station areas are supported by expanded catchments beyond walking, with bicycle catchments significantly influencing access modes. Second, a multidimensional and specific approach suggested the potential to advance the previous node-place model framework. Third, the active modes and private vehicles shared a macro-level alignment, but revealed conflicting tendencies with respect to access modes. Fourth, active transit accessibility and number of residents within bicycle catchments showed different nonlinear patterns in relation to access modes, which further varied across clusters. Finally, intersection density tended to discourage private-vehicle access at the macro level, although this was not consistent with the cluster hierarchy. This study is expected to advance station typology research and serve as a useful tool for integrated land use and transport planning.
基于节点地点模型和机器学习的公交车站类型中融合多模式和访问模式共享:以日本中京大都市区为例
本研究旨在通过结合多模式可达性、多维特征和使用第一英里访问模式的可解释性,开发一个类型学框架来评估站点。本文对中京都市圈394个车站的45个指标进行了探索性因子分析,确定了6个因子:地方、可达性、多式联运地、轨道节点、形态和人口特征。采用分层聚类方法得到6种类型的站点,并基于节点-地点模型对站点进行评价。然后,我们使用梯度提升决策树(GBDT)模型的Shapley值解释并比较了跨集群访问模式共享的站级特征重要性。第一个主要发现是,除了步行之外,车站区域得到了扩展的集水区的支持,自行车集水区显著影响了通行方式。其次,一种多维的、具体的方法表明有可能推进以前的节点-地点模型框架。③主动式模式与私家车在宏观层面上保持一致,但在接入方式上呈现冲突趋势;(4)自行车集水区内的主动交通可达性和居民数量随出行方式的变化呈现出不同的非线性模式,且在不同集群间存在差异。最后,在宏观层面上,交叉口密度倾向于阻碍私家车进入,尽管这与集群层次不一致。本研究可望推动车站类型学研究,并为综合土地利用和交通规划提供有用的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Transportation, affiliated with the Center for Urban Transportation Research, is an international peer-reviewed open access journal focused on various forms of public transportation. It publishes original research from diverse academic disciplines, including engineering, economics, planning, and policy, emphasizing innovative solutions to transportation challenges. Content covers mobility services available to the general public, such as line-based services and shared fleets, offering insights beneficial to passengers, agencies, service providers, and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书