A 3-year retrospective review of fatal carbon monoxide toxicity in the Western Cape, South Africa (2022–2024)

Q3 Medicine
Forensic Science International: Reports Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-17 DOI:10.1016/j.fsir.2025.100434
Carl Grevel , Marie Belle Kathrina Mendoza Hlela , Domonica Dos Reis , Chanté du Toit , Bronwen Davies
{"title":"A 3-year retrospective review of fatal carbon monoxide toxicity in the Western Cape, South Africa (2022–2024)","authors":"Carl Grevel ,&nbsp;Marie Belle Kathrina Mendoza Hlela ,&nbsp;Domonica Dos Reis ,&nbsp;Chanté du Toit ,&nbsp;Bronwen Davies","doi":"10.1016/j.fsir.2025.100434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Charcoal burning (CB) in enclosed spaces has emerged as a recognised method of suicide due to the inhalation of lethal levels of carbon monoxide (CO). While this has been widely documented globally, CB is also implicated in accidental CO poisoning deaths, particularly in densely populated, low-income communities where limited access to safer heating, cooking, and lighting alternatives increases vulnerability and contributes to preventable fatalities. This retrospective study examined CO toxicity deaths unrelated to fire-burns in the Western Cape province of South Africa over a three-year period, from 2022 to 2024, focusing on prevalence, characteristics, and circumstantial patterns. A total of 68 postmortem cases were included from routine submissions to the Forensic Toxicology Unit in Cape Town. Of these, 50 % were suspected accidents, 30.9 % alleged suicides, and 19.1 % remained under investigation. Most victims were male (69.1 %), middle-aged (44.1 %), and deaths peaked in winter (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), primarily driven by accidental exposures. CB was the most frequently identified source of CO, followed by vehicle exhaust and gullies/imbawulas (makeshift metal drums of combustible wood, coals, or refuse). The source of CO exposure was significantly associated with the suspected manner of death (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The mean carboxyhaemoglobin (COHb) level was 60.7 % (range: 31.4–78.4 %) with significantly higher levels in suicides (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), while the mean blood alcohol concentration (BAC) was 0.07 g/100 mL (range: 0.01–0.26 g/100 mL). Most fatalities occurred in congested domestic settings within socio-economically disadvantaged areas, highlighting non-fire CO poisoning as an underrecognised public health concern. Prevention should include public education, housing safety improvements, warning labels, and greater access to safer energy sources.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36331,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International: Reports","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100434"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International: Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665910725000301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Charcoal burning (CB) in enclosed spaces has emerged as a recognised method of suicide due to the inhalation of lethal levels of carbon monoxide (CO). While this has been widely documented globally, CB is also implicated in accidental CO poisoning deaths, particularly in densely populated, low-income communities where limited access to safer heating, cooking, and lighting alternatives increases vulnerability and contributes to preventable fatalities. This retrospective study examined CO toxicity deaths unrelated to fire-burns in the Western Cape province of South Africa over a three-year period, from 2022 to 2024, focusing on prevalence, characteristics, and circumstantial patterns. A total of 68 postmortem cases were included from routine submissions to the Forensic Toxicology Unit in Cape Town. Of these, 50 % were suspected accidents, 30.9 % alleged suicides, and 19.1 % remained under investigation. Most victims were male (69.1 %), middle-aged (44.1 %), and deaths peaked in winter (p < 0.001), primarily driven by accidental exposures. CB was the most frequently identified source of CO, followed by vehicle exhaust and gullies/imbawulas (makeshift metal drums of combustible wood, coals, or refuse). The source of CO exposure was significantly associated with the suspected manner of death (p < 0.001). The mean carboxyhaemoglobin (COHb) level was 60.7 % (range: 31.4–78.4 %) with significantly higher levels in suicides (p < 0.001), while the mean blood alcohol concentration (BAC) was 0.07 g/100 mL (range: 0.01–0.26 g/100 mL). Most fatalities occurred in congested domestic settings within socio-economically disadvantaged areas, highlighting non-fire CO poisoning as an underrecognised public health concern. Prevention should include public education, housing safety improvements, warning labels, and greater access to safer energy sources.
南非西开普省致命一氧化碳毒性的3年回顾性分析(2022-2024)
由于吸入致命水平的一氧化碳(CO),在封闭空间中燃烧木炭(CB)已成为公认的自杀方法。虽然这在全球范围内得到了广泛的记录,但炭黑也与CO中毒意外死亡有关,特别是在人口密集的低收入社区,这些社区获得更安全的取暖、烹饪和照明替代品的机会有限,增加了脆弱性,并导致了可预防的死亡。这项回顾性研究调查了南非西开普省从2022年到2024年三年期间与火灾无关的CO毒性死亡,重点关注患病率、特征和间接模式。从例行提交给开普敦法医毒理学股的报告中,共纳入了68个死后病例。其中,50. %疑似事故,30.9 %疑似自杀,19.1 %仍在调查中。大多数受害者为男性(69.1 %)和中年人(44.1% %),死亡高峰出现在冬季(p <; 0.001),主要由意外暴露所致。炭黑是最常见的CO来源,其次是汽车尾气和沟渠/imbawulas(由可燃木材、煤炭或垃圾制成的临时金属桶)。一氧化碳暴露源与疑似死亡方式显著相关(p <; 0.001)。平均血氧血红蛋白(COHb)水平为60.7 %(范围:31.4-78.4 %),自杀者的血氧血红蛋白水平显著高于自杀者(p <; 0.001),平均血酒精浓度(BAC)为0.07 g/100 mL(范围:0.01-0.26 g/100 mL)。大多数死亡发生在社会经济不利地区拥挤的家庭环境中,突出表明非火灾一氧化碳中毒是一个未得到充分认识的公共卫生问题。预防措施应包括公共教育、住房安全改进、警告标签以及更容易获得更安全的能源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forensic Science International: Reports
Forensic Science International: Reports Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书