Lymphedema imaging and AI: A review of diagnostic modalities, biomarkers, and clinical integration

IF 6.3 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Biomedical Journal Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-19 DOI:10.1016/j.bj.2025.100932
Bushra Urooj , Sabir Ali , Syed Kumail Hussain Naqvi , Furen Xiao , Po-Cheng Huang
{"title":"Lymphedema imaging and AI: A review of diagnostic modalities, biomarkers, and clinical integration","authors":"Bushra Urooj ,&nbsp;Sabir Ali ,&nbsp;Syed Kumail Hussain Naqvi ,&nbsp;Furen Xiao ,&nbsp;Po-Cheng Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.bj.2025.100932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lymphedema, a chronic lymphatic disorder characterized by swelling, fibrosis, and adipose tissue accumulation, requires precise, stage-specific imaging for effective diagnosis and management. This review evaluates conventional imaging modalities, including indocyanine green lymphography (ICG-L), lymphoscintigraphy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT), alongside emerging artificial intelligence (AI) applications to enhance diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning. We analyze their capabilities in assessing lymphatic function and tissue changes through quantitative biomarkers, comparing their strengths across disease stages. ICG-L excels in detecting early lymphatic dysfunction, while MRI and CT provide detailed visualization of advanced fibrotic and adipose changes. AI-driven tools, such as automated segmentation and biomarker quantification, show promise in improving tissue characterization and supporting surgical planning. However, clinical integration of AI is hindered by data heterogeneity, lack of interpretability, and regulatory challenges. To address these, we propose a strategic framework incorporating federated learning for privacy-preserving model training, explainable AI for clinical transparency, and standardized imaging protocols. Future efforts should prioritize multicenter validation and harmonized guidelines to enhance reproducibility and ensure equitable, scalable adoption of advanced imaging technologies for lymphedema management worldwide.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8934,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Journal","volume":"49 3","pages":"Article 100932"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2319417025001064","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lymphedema, a chronic lymphatic disorder characterized by swelling, fibrosis, and adipose tissue accumulation, requires precise, stage-specific imaging for effective diagnosis and management. This review evaluates conventional imaging modalities, including indocyanine green lymphography (ICG-L), lymphoscintigraphy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT), alongside emerging artificial intelligence (AI) applications to enhance diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning. We analyze their capabilities in assessing lymphatic function and tissue changes through quantitative biomarkers, comparing their strengths across disease stages. ICG-L excels in detecting early lymphatic dysfunction, while MRI and CT provide detailed visualization of advanced fibrotic and adipose changes. AI-driven tools, such as automated segmentation and biomarker quantification, show promise in improving tissue characterization and supporting surgical planning. However, clinical integration of AI is hindered by data heterogeneity, lack of interpretability, and regulatory challenges. To address these, we propose a strategic framework incorporating federated learning for privacy-preserving model training, explainable AI for clinical transparency, and standardized imaging protocols. Future efforts should prioritize multicenter validation and harmonized guidelines to enhance reproducibility and ensure equitable, scalable adoption of advanced imaging technologies for lymphedema management worldwide.
淋巴水肿成像和人工智能:诊断方式、生物标志物和临床整合的综述。
淋巴水肿是一种以肿胀、纤维化和脂肪组织积累为特征的慢性淋巴疾病,需要精确的、特定阶段的影像学检查才能有效诊断和治疗。本文综述了传统的成像方式,包括吲哚菁绿淋巴显像(ICG-L)、淋巴显像、磁共振成像(MRI)和计算机断层扫描(CT),以及新兴的人工智能(AI)应用,以提高诊断准确性和治疗计划。我们通过定量生物标志物分析了它们在评估淋巴功能和组织变化方面的能力,比较了它们在不同疾病阶段的优势。ICG-L擅长发现早期淋巴功能障碍,而MRI和CT提供晚期纤维化和脂肪改变的详细可视化。人工智能驱动的工具,如自动分割和生物标志物量化,在改善组织表征和支持手术计划方面显示出希望。然而,人工智能的临床整合受到数据异质性、缺乏可解释性和监管挑战的阻碍。为了解决这些问题,我们提出了一个战略框架,包括用于隐私保护模型训练的联邦学习、用于临床透明度的可解释人工智能和标准化成像协议。未来的工作应优先考虑多中心验证和统一的指导方针,以提高可重复性,并确保公平,可扩展地采用先进的成像技术在全球淋巴水肿管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical Journal
Biomedical Journal Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
128
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Biomedical Journal publishes 6 peer-reviewed issues per year in all fields of clinical and biomedical sciences for an internationally diverse authorship. Unlike most open access journals, which are free to readers but not authors, Biomedical Journal does not charge for subscription, submission, processing or publication of manuscripts, nor for color reproduction of photographs. Clinical studies, accounts of clinical trials, biomarker studies, and characterization of human pathogens are within the scope of the journal, as well as basic studies in model species such as Escherichia coli, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, and Mus musculus revealing the function of molecules, cells, and tissues relevant for human health. However, articles on other species can be published if they contribute to our understanding of basic mechanisms of biology. A highly-cited international editorial board assures timely publication of manuscripts. Reviews on recent progress in biomedical sciences are commissioned by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书