Efficacy of advice for preventing separation-related behaviors in puppies: A video trial and separation test

IF 1.9 3区 农林科学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Fiona C. Dale , Rachel A. Casey , Charlotte C. Burn
{"title":"Efficacy of advice for preventing separation-related behaviors in puppies: A video trial and separation test","authors":"Fiona C. Dale ,&nbsp;Rachel A. Casey ,&nbsp;Charlotte C. Burn","doi":"10.1016/j.jveb.2025.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Preventing separation-related behaviors (SRBs) is important for canine welfare, potentially reducing relinquishment or euthanasia. This double-blind study assessed efficacy of advice provided to prospective puppy owners. Thirty-four owners were randomly assigned to treatments: (1) Control, receiving responsible ownership advice; (2) Calm, receiving control advice plus advice on calm interactions during departures and reunions; (3) Habituation, receiving control plus advice on gradually increasing time left alone; or (4) Combination, receiving all advice. Owners filmed puppies alone at four timepoints over 6 months and during a separation test. A treatment-blind observer scored puppy behavior, later categorized as ‘active anxious’ (e.g. whining, barking), ‘passive anxious’ (e.g. panting, lip-licking), ‘inactivity’ (e.g. lying) and ‘active positive’ (e.g. playing, eating). Recruitment challenges caused sub-optimal sample size, rendering findings exploratory. Calm group puppies exhibited more inactivity than Control and Combination across timepoints and in separation tests; Habituation group puppies showed more inactivity than Controls during separation tests. Other behavior categories showed no significant associations with treatment. However, across treatments, puppies whose owners did more habituation activities showed less passive anxious behavior. Passive anxious scores were greater in puppies left alone than with other dogs. When radio or TV was on, versus off, puppies showed more passive anxious and less active positive behavior. While the advice did not significantly reduce SRBs, possibly due to sub-optimal sampling, the Calm advice, and to some extent Habituation, were associated with greater inactivity when dogs were alone. Further research could aim to verify findings and maximize owner compliance with SRB prevention advice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17567,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Behavior-clinical Applications and Research","volume":"83 ","pages":"Pages 52-68"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Behavior-clinical Applications and Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558787825001042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preventing separation-related behaviors (SRBs) is important for canine welfare, potentially reducing relinquishment or euthanasia. This double-blind study assessed efficacy of advice provided to prospective puppy owners. Thirty-four owners were randomly assigned to treatments: (1) Control, receiving responsible ownership advice; (2) Calm, receiving control advice plus advice on calm interactions during departures and reunions; (3) Habituation, receiving control plus advice on gradually increasing time left alone; or (4) Combination, receiving all advice. Owners filmed puppies alone at four timepoints over 6 months and during a separation test. A treatment-blind observer scored puppy behavior, later categorized as ‘active anxious’ (e.g. whining, barking), ‘passive anxious’ (e.g. panting, lip-licking), ‘inactivity’ (e.g. lying) and ‘active positive’ (e.g. playing, eating). Recruitment challenges caused sub-optimal sample size, rendering findings exploratory. Calm group puppies exhibited more inactivity than Control and Combination across timepoints and in separation tests; Habituation group puppies showed more inactivity than Controls during separation tests. Other behavior categories showed no significant associations with treatment. However, across treatments, puppies whose owners did more habituation activities showed less passive anxious behavior. Passive anxious scores were greater in puppies left alone than with other dogs. When radio or TV was on, versus off, puppies showed more passive anxious and less active positive behavior. While the advice did not significantly reduce SRBs, possibly due to sub-optimal sampling, the Calm advice, and to some extent Habituation, were associated with greater inactivity when dogs were alone. Further research could aim to verify findings and maximize owner compliance with SRB prevention advice.
建议预防幼犬分离相关行为的有效性:视频试验和分离测试
防止分离相关行为(srb)对狗的福利很重要,可能会减少放弃或安乐死。这项双盲研究评估了向潜在的小狗主人提供建议的有效性。34名饲主随机分为两组:(1)对照组,接受负责任的饲主建议;(2)冷静,接受控制建议以及离境和团聚时冷静互动的建议;(3)习惯化,接受控制并建议逐渐增加独处时间;或(4)组合,接受所有建议。主人在6个月和分离测试期间的四个时间点拍摄了狗狗的单独照片。一名不接受治疗的观察者对小狗的行为进行打分,后来将其归类为“主动焦虑”(如呜咽、吠叫)、“被动焦虑”(如喘气、舔嘴唇)、“不活跃”(如撒谎)和“主动积极”(如玩耍、吃东西)。招聘挑战导致样本数量不够理想,使得研究结果具有探索性。在不同的时间点和分离测试中,平静组的幼犬表现出比对照组和组合组更多的不活动;在分离测试中,习惯组的幼犬表现出比对照组更多的不活动。其他行为类别与治疗没有显著关联。然而,在整个治疗过程中,主人进行更多习惯化活动的小狗表现出较少的被动焦虑行为。与其他狗狗在一起相比,单独留下的小狗被动焦虑得分更高。当收音机或电视打开时,小狗表现出更多的被动焦虑和更少的主动积极行为。虽然建议并没有显著降低srb,可能是由于次优抽样,平静的建议,在某种程度上习惯化,与狗独处时更不活动有关。进一步的研究可以旨在验证调查结果,并最大限度地提高业主对SRB预防建议的依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
325 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research is an international journal that focuses on all aspects of veterinary behavioral medicine, with a particular emphasis on clinical applications and research. Articles cover such topics as basic research involving normal signaling or social behaviors, welfare and/or housing issues, molecular or quantitative genetics, and applied behavioral issues (eg, working dogs) that may have implications for clinical interest or assessment. JVEB is the official journal of the Australian Veterinary Behaviour Interest Group, the British Veterinary Behaviour Association, Gesellschaft fr Tierverhaltensmedizin und Therapie, the International Working Dog Breeding Association, the Pet Professional Guild, the Association Veterinaire Suisse pour la Medecine Comportementale, and The American Veterinary Society of Animal Behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书