Segmentation of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue in abdominal CT-datasets with and without contrast medium: Influence of iterative reconstruction on 2D- and 3D-segmentation

IF 3.5 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
European Journal of Radiology Open Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-17 DOI:10.1016/j.ejro.2025.100707
Robin F. Gohmann , Fyn Kaiser , Batuhan Temiz , Sebastian Gottschling , Christian Krieghoff , Christian Lücke , Matthias Horn , Matthias Gutberlet
{"title":"Segmentation of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue in abdominal CT-datasets with and without contrast medium: Influence of iterative reconstruction on 2D- and 3D-segmentation","authors":"Robin F. Gohmann ,&nbsp;Fyn Kaiser ,&nbsp;Batuhan Temiz ,&nbsp;Sebastian Gottschling ,&nbsp;Christian Krieghoff ,&nbsp;Christian Lücke ,&nbsp;Matthias Horn ,&nbsp;Matthias Gutberlet","doi":"10.1016/j.ejro.2025.100707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Segmentation of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue in computed tomography (CT) datasets has shown much promise in research and for medical applications, e.g. for risk stratification and guiding therapies. This study evaluates the influence of iterative reconstruction (IR) and filtered back projection (FBP) techniques on 2D- and 3D-segmentation of adipose tissue in CT images with and without contrast medium.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed 31 patients to compare adipose tissue density and quantity between IR and FBP across different compartments and contrast phases. Segmentation was performed using a fixed threshold (-190 to -30 HU).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Significant differences were observed in 2D-segmentation, particularly for visceral adipose tissue in non-enhanced scans (-0.54 ± 1.4 HU; <em>p</em> = 0.04) and subcutaneous adipose tissue in venous scans (-0.48 ± 1.2 HU; <em>p</em> = 0.03). In 3D-segmentation, subcutaneous adipose tissue density in venous scans was also lower with IR compared to FBP (-0.67 ± 1.2 HU; <em>p</em> = 0.004).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Adipose tissue segmentation between IR and FBP revealed minimal and only occasionally yields statistically significant differences in density and quantity across adipose tissue compartments and contrast phases. The observed differences were very small, casting doubt on their clinical relevance at the level of individual patients. However, even subtle systematic variations may warrant consideration in population-based studies or longitudinal research where methodological consistency is critical.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38076,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology Open","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100707"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047725000747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Segmentation of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue in computed tomography (CT) datasets has shown much promise in research and for medical applications, e.g. for risk stratification and guiding therapies. This study evaluates the influence of iterative reconstruction (IR) and filtered back projection (FBP) techniques on 2D- and 3D-segmentation of adipose tissue in CT images with and without contrast medium.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 31 patients to compare adipose tissue density and quantity between IR and FBP across different compartments and contrast phases. Segmentation was performed using a fixed threshold (-190 to -30 HU).

Results

Significant differences were observed in 2D-segmentation, particularly for visceral adipose tissue in non-enhanced scans (-0.54 ± 1.4 HU; p = 0.04) and subcutaneous adipose tissue in venous scans (-0.48 ± 1.2 HU; p = 0.03). In 3D-segmentation, subcutaneous adipose tissue density in venous scans was also lower with IR compared to FBP (-0.67 ± 1.2 HU; p = 0.004).

Conclusion

Adipose tissue segmentation between IR and FBP revealed minimal and only occasionally yields statistically significant differences in density and quantity across adipose tissue compartments and contrast phases. The observed differences were very small, casting doubt on their clinical relevance at the level of individual patients. However, even subtle systematic variations may warrant consideration in population-based studies or longitudinal research where methodological consistency is critical.
有和没有造影剂的腹部ct数据集中内脏和皮下脂肪组织分割:迭代重建对二维和三维分割的影响
目的在计算机断层扫描(CT)数据集中分割内脏和皮下脂肪组织在研究和医学应用中显示出很大的前景,例如用于风险分层和指导治疗。本研究评估了迭代重建(IR)和滤波后投影(FBP)技术对有造影剂和无造影剂的CT图像中脂肪组织的2D和3d分割的影响。方法回顾性分析31例患者,比较IR和FBP在不同室室和对比期的脂肪组织密度和数量。使用固定阈值(-190至-30 HU)进行分割。结果两组在2d分割方面存在显著差异,尤其是非增强扫描时内脏脂肪组织(-0.54 ± 1.4 HU; p = 0.04)和静脉扫描时皮下脂肪组织(-0.48 ± 1.2 HU; p = 0.03)。在3d分割中,静脉扫描的皮下脂肪组织密度也比FBP低(-0.67 ± 1.2 HU; p = 0.004)。结论IR和FBP之间的脂肪组织分割显示,脂肪组织间隔和对比期的密度和数量差异很小,只是偶尔出现统计学意义上的差异。观察到的差异非常小,使人怀疑其在个体患者水平上的临床相关性。然而,在基于人群的研究或纵向研究中,即使是细微的系统变化也可能需要考虑,因为方法的一致性是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Radiology Open
European Journal of Radiology Open Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
51 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书