Workplace violence and burnout among emergency medical service workers and nurses in Germany: a cross-sectional study.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Karsten Roth, Julia Köppen, Cornelia Henschke
{"title":"Workplace violence and burnout among emergency medical service workers and nurses in Germany: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Karsten Roth, Julia Köppen, Cornelia Henschke","doi":"10.1186/s12960-025-01026-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nonphysician healthcare workers play a crucial role in patient care, often under challenging conditions. Workplace violence puts professionals such as nurses and emergency medical service (EMS) workers at risk for (emotional) stress. This study comparatively analyzed the burden of workplace violence, burnout risk, and their associations among nurses and EMS workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two surveys were conducted using (i) a paper-pencil questionnaire for nurses and (ii) an online questionnaire for EMS workers in 2015. The surveys assessed experiences of workplace complaints, violence, and burnout risk measured by the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI). Data were analyzed descriptively (frequencies, means, percentages, Pearson correlation coefficients). Associations between workplace violence and burnout were estimated using binary logistic regression, adjusting for gender, employment status, work experience, education, and working conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 3,169 nurses (84.7% female) and 1,024 EMS workers (13.6% female) were analyzed. Frequent verbal abuse-ranging from daily incidents to several times a month-was reported by 44.7% of nurses and 59.9% of EMS workers, while 12.2% and 23.5%, respectively, experienced physical violence from patients or their families. Overall, a large proportion of employees in both professions have a moderate to high risk of burnout in the dimension of emotional exhaustion (EE) (nurses: 58.1%, EMS workers: 56.3%) and in the dimension of depersonalization (DP) (nurses: 58.4%, EMS workers: 74.4%). Logistic regression revealed that physical violence was significantly associated with a high risk of burnout in the dimensions EE and DP in nurses, and EE in EMS workers. Verbal abuse by patients was significantly associated with EE and DP in nurses, and with DP in EMS workers. In addition, an increased risk of burnout in both MBI dimensions was significantly associated with variables of working conditions and work experience for both professions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first comparative study to examine the association between workplace violence and the risk of burnout among nurses and EMS workers. These findings highlight the need for strengthened measures to address workplace violence, prevent burnout among employees, and support staff in coping with these challenges. Improvements in working conditions must also be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":39823,"journal":{"name":"Human Resources for Health","volume":"23 1","pages":"66"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12632002/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resources for Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-025-01026-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nonphysician healthcare workers play a crucial role in patient care, often under challenging conditions. Workplace violence puts professionals such as nurses and emergency medical service (EMS) workers at risk for (emotional) stress. This study comparatively analyzed the burden of workplace violence, burnout risk, and their associations among nurses and EMS workers.

Methods: Two surveys were conducted using (i) a paper-pencil questionnaire for nurses and (ii) an online questionnaire for EMS workers in 2015. The surveys assessed experiences of workplace complaints, violence, and burnout risk measured by the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI). Data were analyzed descriptively (frequencies, means, percentages, Pearson correlation coefficients). Associations between workplace violence and burnout were estimated using binary logistic regression, adjusting for gender, employment status, work experience, education, and working conditions.

Results: Data from 3,169 nurses (84.7% female) and 1,024 EMS workers (13.6% female) were analyzed. Frequent verbal abuse-ranging from daily incidents to several times a month-was reported by 44.7% of nurses and 59.9% of EMS workers, while 12.2% and 23.5%, respectively, experienced physical violence from patients or their families. Overall, a large proportion of employees in both professions have a moderate to high risk of burnout in the dimension of emotional exhaustion (EE) (nurses: 58.1%, EMS workers: 56.3%) and in the dimension of depersonalization (DP) (nurses: 58.4%, EMS workers: 74.4%). Logistic regression revealed that physical violence was significantly associated with a high risk of burnout in the dimensions EE and DP in nurses, and EE in EMS workers. Verbal abuse by patients was significantly associated with EE and DP in nurses, and with DP in EMS workers. In addition, an increased risk of burnout in both MBI dimensions was significantly associated with variables of working conditions and work experience for both professions.

Conclusions: This is the first comparative study to examine the association between workplace violence and the risk of burnout among nurses and EMS workers. These findings highlight the need for strengthened measures to address workplace violence, prevent burnout among employees, and support staff in coping with these challenges. Improvements in working conditions must also be considered.

Abstract Image

德国紧急医疗服务工作者和护士的工作场所暴力和倦怠:一项横断面研究。
背景:非医师保健工作者在病人护理中起着至关重要的作用,通常在具有挑战性的条件下。工作场所暴力使护士和紧急医疗服务(EMS)工作人员等专业人员面临(情绪)压力的风险。本研究比较分析护理人员与急救人员工作场所暴力负担、职业倦怠风险及其相关性。方法:2015年对护士进行纸笔问卷调查,对EMS工作人员进行网上问卷调查。这些调查评估了工作场所投诉、暴力的经历,以及通过马斯拉克职业倦怠量表(MBI)测量的职业倦怠风险。对数据进行描述性分析(频率、平均值、百分比、Pearson相关系数)。工作场所暴力和职业倦怠之间的关联使用二元逻辑回归进行估计,调整性别、就业状况、工作经验、教育和工作条件。结果:分析了3169名护士(女性占84.7%)和1024名EMS工作人员(女性占13.6%)的数据。44.7%的护士和59.9%的急救人员报告了频繁的言语虐待,从每天的事件到一个月的几次,而分别有12.2%和23.5%的人遭受过患者或其家人的身体暴力。总体而言,在情绪耗竭(EE)维度(护士:58.1%,EMS工作者:56.3%)和人格解体(DP)维度(护士:58.4%,EMS工作者:74.4%)中,两种职业中都有很大比例的员工存在中度至高度的倦怠风险。Logistic回归分析结果显示,身体暴力与护士的情感表达和情感发展维度、急救人员的情感表达维度的职业倦怠风险显著相关。患者的言语虐待与护士的情感表达和DP显著相关,与EMS工作人员的情感表达和DP显著相关。此外,两种职业的工作条件和工作经验变量都显著增加了MBI两个维度的职业倦怠风险。结论:本研究首次对护士和急救人员工作场所暴力与职业倦怠风险之间的关系进行了比较研究。这些调查结果强调,需要加强措施,解决工作场所暴力问题,防止员工倦怠,并支持员工应对这些挑战。还必须考虑改善工作条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Resources for Health
Human Resources for Health Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
102
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Resources for Health is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal covering all aspects of planning, producing and managing the health workforce - all those who provide health services worldwide. Human Resources for Health aims to disseminate research on health workforce policy, the health labour market, health workforce practice, development of knowledge tools and implementation mechanisms nationally and internationally; as well as specific features of the health workforce, such as the impact of management of health workers" performance and its link with health outcomes. The journal encourages debate on health sector reforms and their link with human resources issues, a hitherto-neglected area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书