Association between serum levels of essential elements (copper, zinc, and iron) and major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 5.2 4区 医学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Reviews on Environmental Health Pub Date : 2025-11-21 Print Date: 2026-03-26 DOI:10.1515/reveh-2025-0116
Omran Davarinejad, Zahraalsadat Nasseri, Borhan Mansouri
{"title":"Association between serum levels of essential elements (copper, zinc, and iron) and major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Omran Davarinejad, Zahraalsadat Nasseri, Borhan Mansouri","doi":"10.1515/reveh-2025-0116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Trace elements such as zinc, iron, and copper are integral to neurochemical regulation, oxidative balance, and immune modulation. Their dysregulation has been increasingly implicated in the pathophysiology of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify differences in serum levels of zinc, iron, and copper between individuals with MDD and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>Sixteen observational studies were included following a comprehensive search of major databases. Data on serum concentrations of zinc, iron, and copper were extracted and pooled using a random-effects model. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic, and publication bias was evaluated via funnel plots and Egger's regression. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of findings.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Meta-analysis revealed serum copper levels were significantly higher in patients with MDD compared to controls (SMD = +0.42; 95 % CI: +0.18 to +0.66; I<sup>2</sup>=67.4 %), while zinc (SMD = -0.62; 95 % CI: -0.78 to -0.46; I<sup>2</sup>=68.4 %) and iron (SMD = -0.36; 95 % CI: -0.52 to -0.20; I<sup>2</sup>=58.2 %) were lower in MDD patients. Evidence of publication bias was observed for zinc and copper, but adjusted estimates remained significant for zinc and iron.</p><p><strong>Outlook: </strong>This study demonstrates consistent reductions in serum zinc and iron among individuals with MDD, supporting their potential role in depressive pathophysiology. While copper findings were inconclusive, the stability of zinc and iron results highlights the clinical relevance of micronutrient assessment in depression. These findings provide a foundation for future research in nutritional psychiatry and adjunctive treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":21165,"journal":{"name":"Reviews on Environmental Health","volume":" ","pages":"43-55"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews on Environmental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2025-0116","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Trace elements such as zinc, iron, and copper are integral to neurochemical regulation, oxidative balance, and immune modulation. Their dysregulation has been increasingly implicated in the pathophysiology of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify differences in serum levels of zinc, iron, and copper between individuals with MDD and healthy controls.

Content: Sixteen observational studies were included following a comprehensive search of major databases. Data on serum concentrations of zinc, iron, and copper were extracted and pooled using a random-effects model. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic, and publication bias was evaluated via funnel plots and Egger's regression. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of findings.

Summary: Meta-analysis revealed serum copper levels were significantly higher in patients with MDD compared to controls (SMD = +0.42; 95 % CI: +0.18 to +0.66; I2=67.4 %), while zinc (SMD = -0.62; 95 % CI: -0.78 to -0.46; I2=68.4 %) and iron (SMD = -0.36; 95 % CI: -0.52 to -0.20; I2=58.2 %) were lower in MDD patients. Evidence of publication bias was observed for zinc and copper, but adjusted estimates remained significant for zinc and iron.

Outlook: This study demonstrates consistent reductions in serum zinc and iron among individuals with MDD, supporting their potential role in depressive pathophysiology. While copper findings were inconclusive, the stability of zinc and iron results highlights the clinical relevance of micronutrient assessment in depression. These findings provide a foundation for future research in nutritional psychiatry and adjunctive treatment strategies.

血清必需元素(铜、锌和铁)水平与重度抑郁症之间的关系:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
微量元素如锌、铁和铜是神经化学调节、氧化平衡和免疫调节的组成部分。它们的失调越来越多地与重度抑郁症(MDD)的病理生理有关。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在量化重度抑郁症患者和健康对照者血清锌、铁和铜水平的差异。内容:在对主要数据库进行全面检索后,纳入了16项观察性研究。提取锌、铁和铜的血清浓度数据,并采用随机效应模型进行汇总。计算95 %置信区间(ci)的标准化平均差(SMDs)。采用I2统计量评估异质性,通过漏斗图和Egger回归评估发表偏倚。进行敏感性分析以检验结果的稳健性。摘要:荟萃分析显示,MDD患者的血清铜水平明显高于对照组(SMD = +0.42; 95 % CI: +0.18至+0.66;I2=67.4 %),而锌(SMD = -0.62; 95 % CI: -0.78至-0.46;I2=68.4 %)和铁(SMD = -0.36; 95 % CI: -0.52至-0.20;I2=58.2 %)在MDD患者中较低。锌和铜存在发表偏倚的证据,但锌和铁的校正估计仍然显著。展望:本研究表明重度抑郁症患者血清锌和铁的持续减少,支持其在抑郁病理生理中的潜在作用。虽然铜的研究结果尚无定论,但锌和铁结果的稳定性突出了微量营养素评估在抑郁症中的临床相关性。这些发现为今后营养精神病学和辅助治疗策略的研究提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reviews on Environmental Health
Reviews on Environmental Health Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Reviews on Environmental Health (REVEH) is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to fill the need for publication of review articles on hot topics in the field of environmental health. Reviews on Environmental Health aims to be an inspiring forum for scientists, environmentalists, physicians, engineers, and students who are concerned with aspects of human health, including quality of life, that are determined by physiological and psychosociological interactions between man and physical, chemical, biological, and social factors in the environment. Reviews on Environmental Health is an important niche served by no other journal, that’s being a site where thoughtful reviews can be published on a variety of subjects related to both health and environment. One challenge is to bridge the research on environmental causes of disease with the clinical practice of medicine. Reviews on Environmental Health is a source of integrated information on environment and health subjects that will be of value to the broad scientific community, whether students, junior and senior professionals, or clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书