The market price of greenness: a factor pricing approach for green and conventional bonds

IF 1.1 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Beatrice Bertelli, Gianna Boero, Costanza Torricelli
{"title":"The market price of greenness: a factor pricing approach for green and conventional bonds","authors":"Beatrice Bertelli,&nbsp;Gianna Boero,&nbsp;Costanza Torricelli","doi":"10.1007/s10436-025-00469-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper distinguishes itself from previous studies and contributes to the literature by estimating a green premium using a factor model framework. Specifically, we propose a two-factor model, where bond returns are explained not only by a systemic market risk factor but also by a systemic green risk factor. Using the Fama and MacBeth regression approach on a sample of Euro-denominated green and conventional bonds over the period 06.11.2014–30.06.2021, we estimate the green premium disentangling its two components: the sensitivity to systemic greenness (i.e. magnitude of risk) and the price of green risk. Three main results emerge from our research. First, we find that the price of green risk is significant and positive albeit small. Second, the sign of the green premium is substantially driven by the issuer macro sector rather than by the green label, being on average negative for Financial bonds and positive for Government and Non-Financial ones, whereby this difference can be explained by a more direct exposure to green systemic risk in the latter two cases. Third, looking at the dynamics of the green risk price we find it decreases to almost zero as the bond market reaches a new normal, but it becomes negative during Covid-19 pandemic, suggesting greenness is considered a benefit in periods of financial distress caused by negative economic shocks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45289,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Finance","volume":"21 3","pages":"317 - 350"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10436-025-00469-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10436-025-00469-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper distinguishes itself from previous studies and contributes to the literature by estimating a green premium using a factor model framework. Specifically, we propose a two-factor model, where bond returns are explained not only by a systemic market risk factor but also by a systemic green risk factor. Using the Fama and MacBeth regression approach on a sample of Euro-denominated green and conventional bonds over the period 06.11.2014–30.06.2021, we estimate the green premium disentangling its two components: the sensitivity to systemic greenness (i.e. magnitude of risk) and the price of green risk. Three main results emerge from our research. First, we find that the price of green risk is significant and positive albeit small. Second, the sign of the green premium is substantially driven by the issuer macro sector rather than by the green label, being on average negative for Financial bonds and positive for Government and Non-Financial ones, whereby this difference can be explained by a more direct exposure to green systemic risk in the latter two cases. Third, looking at the dynamics of the green risk price we find it decreases to almost zero as the bond market reaches a new normal, but it becomes negative during Covid-19 pandemic, suggesting greenness is considered a benefit in periods of financial distress caused by negative economic shocks.

绿色的市场价格:绿色债券和传统债券的因素定价方法
本文区别于以往的研究,并通过使用因子模型框架估计绿色溢价来贡献文献。具体而言,我们提出了一个双因素模型,其中债券收益不仅由系统性市场风险因素解释,而且由系统性绿色风险因素解释。使用Fama和MacBeth回归方法对2014年11月6日至2021年6月30日期间以欧元计价的绿色债券和传统债券样本进行分析,我们估计了绿色溢价的两个组成部分:对系统绿色度的敏感性(即风险的大小)和绿色风险的价格。我们的研究得出了三个主要结果。首先,我们发现绿色风险的价格虽小,但显著且正。其次,绿色溢价的信号基本上是由发行人宏观部门驱动的,而不是由绿色标签驱动的,金融债券平均为负,政府和非金融债券平均为正,因此这种差异可以用后两种情况下更直接地暴露于绿色系统风险来解释。第三,观察绿色风险价格的动态,我们发现,随着债券市场达到新常态,绿色风险价格几乎降至零,但在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间变为负值,这表明在负面经济冲击造成的金融困境期间,绿色被视为一种好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Finance
Annals of Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Annals of Finance provides an outlet for original research in all areas of finance and its applications to other disciplines having a clear and substantive link to the general theme of finance. In particular, innovative research papers of moderate length of the highest quality in all scientific areas that are motivated by the analysis of financial problems will be considered. Annals of Finance''s scope encompasses - but is not limited to - the following areas: accounting and finance, asset pricing, banking and finance, capital markets and finance, computational finance, corporate finance, derivatives, dynamical and chaotic systems in finance, economics and finance, empirical finance, experimental finance, finance and the theory of the firm, financial econometrics, financial institutions, mathematical finance, money and finance, portfolio analysis, regulation, stochastic analysis and finance, stock market analysis, systemic risk and financial stability. Annals of Finance also publishes special issues on any topic in finance and its applications of current interest. A small section, entitled finance notes, will be devoted solely to publishing short articles – up to ten pages in length, of substantial interest in finance. Officially cited as: Ann Finance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书