Random Convolutions for Domain Generalization of Deep Learning-based Medical Image Segmentation Models.

IF 20.1 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Daniel Scholz, Ayhan Can Erdur, Jan C Peeken, Aswathi Varma, Robert Graf, Jan S Kirschke, Daniel Rueckert, Benedikt Wiestler
{"title":"Random Convolutions for Domain Generalization of Deep Learning-based Medical Image Segmentation Models.","authors":"Daniel Scholz, Ayhan Can Erdur, Jan C Peeken, Aswathi Varma, Robert Graf, Jan S Kirschke, Daniel Rueckert, Benedikt Wiestler","doi":"10.1148/ryai.240502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To evaluate random convolutions as an augmentation strategy for improving domain generalization of deep learning-based segmentation models in medical imaging. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, a random convolution-based augmentation strategy was applied to abdominal organ segmentation (AbdomenCT-1k dataset: 361 CT images; Abdominal Multi Organ Segmentation [AMOS] dataset: 298 CT and 59 MRI scans) and brain tissue segmentation (Information eXtraction from Images [IXI] dataset: 504 T1-weighted images from Guy's and Hammersmith Hospitals, 146 paired T1-weighted and T2-weighted images from the Institute of Psychiatry). Performance was compared with baseline and state-of-the-art segmentation models (TotalSegmentator and deepAtropos). Random convolution configurations were analyzed for effects on in- and out-of-domain performance. Results The random convolution-enhanced U-Net achieved in-domain Dice scores comparable to state-of-the-art baselines (CT: 0.93 vs TotalSegmentator: 0.95; T1-weighted imaging: 0.83 vs deepAtropos: 0.79). Out-of-domain Dice scores were significantly higher (MRI: 0.93, T2-weighted imaging: 0.52) compared with baselines (TotalSegmentator in MRI: 0.85, deepAtropos in T2-weighted imaging: 0.33; false discovery rate-adjusted <i>P</i> < .001). Augmentation probability and configuration influenced the trade-off between in- and out-of-domain performance. Conclusion Random convolutions yielding more robust segmentation models generalized better to unseen domains than models trained without random convolutions and are compatible with diverse segmentation architectures. <b>Keywords:</b> MR-Imaging, CT, Supervised Learning, Segmentation, Abdomen/GI, Experimental Investigations <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2025 See also commentary by Mathai in this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":29787,"journal":{"name":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","volume":" ","pages":"e240502"},"PeriodicalIF":20.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.240502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate random convolutions as an augmentation strategy for improving domain generalization of deep learning-based segmentation models in medical imaging. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, a random convolution-based augmentation strategy was applied to abdominal organ segmentation (AbdomenCT-1k dataset: 361 CT images; Abdominal Multi Organ Segmentation [AMOS] dataset: 298 CT and 59 MRI scans) and brain tissue segmentation (Information eXtraction from Images [IXI] dataset: 504 T1-weighted images from Guy's and Hammersmith Hospitals, 146 paired T1-weighted and T2-weighted images from the Institute of Psychiatry). Performance was compared with baseline and state-of-the-art segmentation models (TotalSegmentator and deepAtropos). Random convolution configurations were analyzed for effects on in- and out-of-domain performance. Results The random convolution-enhanced U-Net achieved in-domain Dice scores comparable to state-of-the-art baselines (CT: 0.93 vs TotalSegmentator: 0.95; T1-weighted imaging: 0.83 vs deepAtropos: 0.79). Out-of-domain Dice scores were significantly higher (MRI: 0.93, T2-weighted imaging: 0.52) compared with baselines (TotalSegmentator in MRI: 0.85, deepAtropos in T2-weighted imaging: 0.33; false discovery rate-adjusted P < .001). Augmentation probability and configuration influenced the trade-off between in- and out-of-domain performance. Conclusion Random convolutions yielding more robust segmentation models generalized better to unseen domains than models trained without random convolutions and are compatible with diverse segmentation architectures. Keywords: MR-Imaging, CT, Supervised Learning, Segmentation, Abdomen/GI, Experimental Investigations Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2025 See also commentary by Mathai in this issue.

基于深度学习的医学图像分割模型领域泛化的随机卷积。
目的评价随机卷积作为一种增强策略对医学影像中基于深度学习的分割模型的领域泛化的改善作用。在这项回顾性研究中,基于随机卷积的增强策略应用于腹部器官分割(腹部器官分割(腹部器官分割:361张CT图像;AMOS: 298张CT和59张MRI扫描)和脑组织分割(IXI: 504张来自盖伊和哈默史密斯医院的t1加权[T1w]图像,146张来自精神病学研究所的T1w/ t2加权[T2w]图像)。将性能与基线和最先进的分割模型(TotalSegmentator和deepAtropos)进行比较。分析了随机卷积配置对域内和域外性能的影响。随机卷积增强的UNet实现了与最先进基线相当的域内Dice分数(CT: 0.93 vs TotalSegmentator: 0.95; T1w成像:0.83 vs deepAtropos: 0.79)。与基线(MRI TotalSegmentator: 0.85, T2w成像deepAtropos: 0.33, fdr校正P值< 0.001)相比,域外Dice评分显著升高(MRI: 0.93, T2w成像:0.52)。增强概率和配置影响域内和域外性能之间的权衡。结论随机卷积产生的分割模型比没有随机卷积训练的模型更鲁棒,可以更好地泛化到未知领域,并且兼容各种分割架构。©RSNA, 2025年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
1.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Radiology: Artificial Intelligence is a bi-monthly publication that focuses on the emerging applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence in the field of imaging across various disciplines. This journal is available online and accepts multiple manuscript types, including Original Research, Technical Developments, Data Resources, Review articles, Editorials, Letters to the Editor and Replies, Special Reports, and AI in Brief.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书