Development and Validation of the Faceted Dark Triad (FDT) Scale.

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
John-Paul Martindale, David J Hughes, Paul Irwing, Leigha Rose
{"title":"Development and Validation of the Faceted Dark Triad (FDT) Scale.","authors":"John-Paul Martindale, David J Hughes, Paul Irwing, Leigha Rose","doi":"10.1177/10731911251388351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychopathy, narcissism, and Machiavellianism, the \"Dark Triad\" (DT), share a common core of personality facets from the (dis)agreeableness domain (e.g., callousness, deceitfulness). Most DT scales neglect facet-level measurement, instead, adopting broad multidimensional scales that undermine precision and clarity. In contrast, the Elemental Psychopathy Assessment, Five-Factor Machiavellianism Inventory, and Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory used the basic trait approach (i.e., combining relevant Five-Factor Model [FFM] facets) to avoid these issues and provide numerous innovations. However, because they were developed separately, simultaneous use is problematic due to length and three forms of redundancy: (1) identical facets are used in multiple scales, (2) near-identical facets with different labels are used in multiple scales, and (3) numerous ostensibly different facets, derived from the same FFM facet, were developed. The unintended consequence being construct proliferation and jingle-jangle fallacies. This article describes a multi-study integration of these measures to develop a single set of unique facets to assess the DT at facet (e.g., Straightforwardness), domain (e.g., Antagonism), and construct (e.g., Psychopathy) level: the Faceted Dark Triad (FDT) Scale. The FDT, in long, short, and super-short form, provides efficient and theoretically coherent assessment of the DT, with superior psychometric properties and criterion prediction, compared with the original measures and Short Dark Tetrad (SD4).</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251388351"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251388351","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Psychopathy, narcissism, and Machiavellianism, the "Dark Triad" (DT), share a common core of personality facets from the (dis)agreeableness domain (e.g., callousness, deceitfulness). Most DT scales neglect facet-level measurement, instead, adopting broad multidimensional scales that undermine precision and clarity. In contrast, the Elemental Psychopathy Assessment, Five-Factor Machiavellianism Inventory, and Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory used the basic trait approach (i.e., combining relevant Five-Factor Model [FFM] facets) to avoid these issues and provide numerous innovations. However, because they were developed separately, simultaneous use is problematic due to length and three forms of redundancy: (1) identical facets are used in multiple scales, (2) near-identical facets with different labels are used in multiple scales, and (3) numerous ostensibly different facets, derived from the same FFM facet, were developed. The unintended consequence being construct proliferation and jingle-jangle fallacies. This article describes a multi-study integration of these measures to develop a single set of unique facets to assess the DT at facet (e.g., Straightforwardness), domain (e.g., Antagonism), and construct (e.g., Psychopathy) level: the Faceted Dark Triad (FDT) Scale. The FDT, in long, short, and super-short form, provides efficient and theoretically coherent assessment of the DT, with superior psychometric properties and criterion prediction, compared with the original measures and Short Dark Tetrad (SD4).

面形黑暗三人格(FDT)量表的发展和验证。
精神病、自恋和马基雅维利主义,即“黑暗三合一”(DT),在(非)亲和性领域(例如,冷酷无情、欺骗)共享一个共同的人格核心。大多数DT量表忽略了面级测量,相反,采用了广泛的多维尺度,破坏了精度和清晰度。相比之下,元素精神病评估、五因素马基雅维利主义量表和五因素自恋量表使用基本特征方法(即结合相关的五因素模型[FFM]方面)来避免这些问题,并提供了许多创新。然而,由于它们是单独开发的,由于长度和三种形式的冗余,同时使用是有问题的:(1)在多个尺度中使用相同的facet,(2)在多个尺度中使用具有不同标签的几乎相同的facet,以及(3)开发了许多表面上不同的facet,源自同一FFM facet。意想不到的后果是结构扩散和叮当响的谬论。本文描述了这些测量的多研究整合,以开发一套独特的方面来评估DT的方面(例如,直率),领域(例如,对抗)和结构(例如,精神病)水平:面形黑暗三位一体(FDT)量表。与原始测量和短黑暗四分体(SD4)相比,FDT以长、短和超短的形式提供了对DT的有效和理论上连贯的评估,具有优越的心理测量特性和标准预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Assessment
Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Assessment publishes articles in the domain of applied clinical assessment. The emphasis of this journal is on publication of information of relevance to the use of assessment measures, including test development, validation, and interpretation practices. The scope of the journal includes research that can inform assessment practices in mental health, forensic, medical, and other applied settings. Papers that focus on the assessment of cognitive and neuropsychological functioning, personality, and psychopathology are invited. Most papers published in Assessment report the results of original empirical research, however integrative review articles and scholarly case studies will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书