Neslihan Merd, Demet Gündüz, Nur Kara Oğuz, Maksude Esra Kadıoğlu
{"title":"Evaluation of parameter changes in lateral lumbosacral radiography of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis in MRI.","authors":"Neslihan Merd, Demet Gündüz, Nur Kara Oğuz, Maksude Esra Kadıoğlu","doi":"10.1177/02841851251394561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for evaluating lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS); however, its high cost and potential overuse raise concerns. Although plain radiographs are more accessible and cost-effective, there is currently no established radiographic criterion for the diagnosis of LSS.PurposeTo investigate in 100 patients the effect of LSS on objective parameters reflected on radiographs and to adapt existing radiographic indices for the diagnosis of LSS.Material and MethodsBetween September 2017 and May 2018, a retrospective evaluation was performed on 100 patients who underwent lumbosacral MRI and lateral lumbosacral radiography for back and/or leg pain. LSS was confirmed in 50 patients, and various angles, measurements, and ratios were calculated on the radiographs of these patients.ResultsPelvic incidence (PI) was significantly higher in the LSS group (<i>P</i> = 0.029). Foraminal width (FW) and pedicle width (PW) were significantly lower at all levels in patients with spinal stenosis (<i>P</i> <0.001 and <i>P</i> <0.005). Sagittal vertebral body width (SBW):PW ratio was significantly higher at all levels in the LSS group (<i>P</i> <0.005). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed for the parameters showing significant differences between the LSS and control groups. Cutoff values were calculated for each significant parameter and level, and among them, PW, FW, and SBW:PW showed relatively high sensitivity, specificity and accuracy.ConclusionPW, FW, and the SBW/PW ratio demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of LSS. These parameters may be useful for screening purposes; however, they are not sufficient on their own for clinical or surgical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"108-114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851251394561","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for evaluating lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS); however, its high cost and potential overuse raise concerns. Although plain radiographs are more accessible and cost-effective, there is currently no established radiographic criterion for the diagnosis of LSS.PurposeTo investigate in 100 patients the effect of LSS on objective parameters reflected on radiographs and to adapt existing radiographic indices for the diagnosis of LSS.Material and MethodsBetween September 2017 and May 2018, a retrospective evaluation was performed on 100 patients who underwent lumbosacral MRI and lateral lumbosacral radiography for back and/or leg pain. LSS was confirmed in 50 patients, and various angles, measurements, and ratios were calculated on the radiographs of these patients.ResultsPelvic incidence (PI) was significantly higher in the LSS group (P = 0.029). Foraminal width (FW) and pedicle width (PW) were significantly lower at all levels in patients with spinal stenosis (P <0.001 and P <0.005). Sagittal vertebral body width (SBW):PW ratio was significantly higher at all levels in the LSS group (P <0.005). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed for the parameters showing significant differences between the LSS and control groups. Cutoff values were calculated for each significant parameter and level, and among them, PW, FW, and SBW:PW showed relatively high sensitivity, specificity and accuracy.ConclusionPW, FW, and the SBW/PW ratio demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of LSS. These parameters may be useful for screening purposes; however, they are not sufficient on their own for clinical or surgical decision-making.
磁共振成像(MRI)是评估腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)的金标准;然而,它的高成本和潜在的过度使用引发了人们的担忧。虽然x线平片更容易获得且成本更低,但目前尚无确定的诊断LSS的放射学标准。目的探讨100例LSS患者对x线片客观参数的影响,以适应现有影像学指标对LSS的诊断。材料和方法在2017年9月至2018年5月期间,对100名因背部和/或腿部疼痛接受腰骶MRI和侧位腰骶x线摄影的患者进行回顾性评估。50例患者被确诊为LSS,并在这些患者的x线片上计算各种角度、测量和比例。结果LSS组盆腔发生率(PI)显著高于LSS组(P = 0.029)。椎管狭窄患者椎间孔宽度(FW)和椎弓根宽度(PW)在各水平均显著降低(P P P
期刊介绍:
Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.