Therapeutic change may begin before the therapist and patient ever meet: Pre-treatment alliance changes predict clinical outcomes.

IF 9 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Sigal Zilcha-Mano
{"title":"Therapeutic change may begin before the therapist and patient ever meet: Pre-treatment alliance changes predict clinical outcomes.","authors":"Sigal Zilcha-Mano","doi":"10.1159/000548510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mechanisms of change are widely assumed to be activated by the onset of treatment. This foundational premise underlies decades of psychotherapy research and guides the timing of measurement and intervention in clinical science. The present study challenges this assumption by demonstrating that one of the most well-established predictors of treatment outcome-the therapeutic alliance-not only changes before therapy begins, but that these early, pre-treatment changes predict both alliance development and symptom reduction throughout treatment. In a randomized controlled trial for depression (N=100), the therapeutic alliance was assessed twice before patients met their therapist, and weekly thereafter. The pre-treatment change in alliance significantly predicted subsequent alliance dynamics and clinical improvement, above and beyond baseline levels. The findings remained robust even after controlling for pre-treatment outcome expectations and previous treatment experience. These findings suggest that mechanisms traditionally viewed as the result of treatment targeting may, in fact, be antecedents. By revealing pre-treatment shifts in a mechanism once thought to be non-existent prior to patient-therapist contact, this work may challenge fundamental assumptions in clinical psychology and highlights the need to reconceptualize therapeutic change as a dynamic, temporally extended process that may begin before any intervention has occurred. Such a shift has implications for how we define, measure, and intervene on core mechanisms of human change.","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":"29 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548510","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mechanisms of change are widely assumed to be activated by the onset of treatment. This foundational premise underlies decades of psychotherapy research and guides the timing of measurement and intervention in clinical science. The present study challenges this assumption by demonstrating that one of the most well-established predictors of treatment outcome-the therapeutic alliance-not only changes before therapy begins, but that these early, pre-treatment changes predict both alliance development and symptom reduction throughout treatment. In a randomized controlled trial for depression (N=100), the therapeutic alliance was assessed twice before patients met their therapist, and weekly thereafter. The pre-treatment change in alliance significantly predicted subsequent alliance dynamics and clinical improvement, above and beyond baseline levels. The findings remained robust even after controlling for pre-treatment outcome expectations and previous treatment experience. These findings suggest that mechanisms traditionally viewed as the result of treatment targeting may, in fact, be antecedents. By revealing pre-treatment shifts in a mechanism once thought to be non-existent prior to patient-therapist contact, this work may challenge fundamental assumptions in clinical psychology and highlights the need to reconceptualize therapeutic change as a dynamic, temporally extended process that may begin before any intervention has occurred. Such a shift has implications for how we define, measure, and intervene on core mechanisms of human change.
治疗改变可能在治疗师和患者见面之前就开始了:治疗前联盟的改变可以预测临床结果。
改变的机制被广泛认为是在治疗开始时激活的。这一基本前提奠定了数十年心理治疗研究的基础,并指导了临床科学测量和干预的时机。目前的研究挑战了这一假设,证明了治疗结果最完善的预测因素之一——治疗联盟——不仅在治疗开始前发生变化,而且这些早期的、治疗前的变化预测了整个治疗过程中联盟的发展和症状的减轻。在一项针对抑郁症的随机对照试验中(N=100),在患者见治疗师之前对治疗联盟进行两次评估,之后每周评估一次。治疗前联盟的变化显著预测了随后的联盟动态和临床改善,高于和超过基线水平。即使在控制了治疗前的预期结果和以前的治疗经验后,研究结果仍然是强有力的。这些发现表明,传统上被视为治疗靶向结果的机制实际上可能是先决条件。通过揭示在患者-治疗师接触之前曾经被认为不存在的机制中的治疗前转变,这项工作可能挑战临床心理学的基本假设,并强调需要将治疗变化重新定义为一个动态的、暂时延长的过程,这个过程可能在任何干预发生之前就开始了。这种转变对我们如何定义、衡量和干预人类变化的核心机制具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
29.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics is a reputable journal that has been published since 1953. Over the years, it has gained recognition for its independence, originality, and methodological rigor. The journal has been at the forefront of research in psychosomatic medicine, psychotherapy research, and psychopharmacology, and has contributed to the development of new lines of research in these areas. It is now ranked among the world's most cited journals in the field. As the official journal of the International College of Psychosomatic Medicine and the World Federation for Psychotherapy, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics serves as a platform for discussing current and controversial issues and showcasing innovations in assessment and treatment. It offers a unique forum for cutting-edge thinking at the intersection of medical and behavioral sciences, catering to both practicing clinicians and researchers. The journal is indexed in various databases and platforms such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Previews, Google Scholar, Academic Search, and Health Research Premium Collection, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书