Is there an increased risk of preeclampsia using donor sperm, depending on sexual condition?

IF 1.9
Begoña Prieto, Natalia Sanz, María Díaz-Nuñez, Lucía Lainz, Silvia Pérez-Fernández, Olatz Molina, Ainara Bengoetxea, Maitane Gantxegi, Roberto Matorras
{"title":"Is there an increased risk of preeclampsia using donor sperm, depending on sexual condition?","authors":"Begoña Prieto, Natalia Sanz, María Díaz-Nuñez, Lucía Lainz, Silvia Pérez-Fernández, Olatz Molina, Ainara Bengoetxea, Maitane Gantxegi, Roberto Matorras","doi":"10.5935/1518-0557.20250155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>An increased risk of preeclampsia has been described when performing donor intrauterine insemination. One of the possible causes is immunological tolerance to semen. Both lesbian and single women, who have theoretically lower exposure to seminal fluid than heterosexual women requesting artificial insemination with donor, sperm should have a higher incidence of preeclampsia, although this fact has not been analyzed previously.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The population under study consisted of 439 gestations <24 weeks, achieved with artificial insemination with donor sperm, performed in two different populations: heterosexual couples and SLTG (single women, lesbian women, women with transgender partner). Preeclampsia rates and other perinatal outcomes were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found in the development of preeclampsia in the SLTG group 6.03% (12/199) vs. heterosexual patients 5.83% (14/240), p=0.93. In the SLTG group, compared with heterosexual group, age (36 vs. 35, p=0.002) and BMI (24.8 vs. 23.6, p=0.002) were somewhat higher. After adjusting for BMI, age and multiplicity of gestation, there were no significant differences in the risk of preeclampsia between SLTG group and heterosexual women. As expected, in women with preeclampsia, gestational ages and newborn weights (quantitative markers of preeclampsia severity) were significantly lower than in women without preeclampsia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that neither sexual orientation nor previous sperm exposure carries a higher risk of preeclampsia, especially after correction for age and weight. Artificial insemination with donor sperm performed on single women, lesbians or women with transgender partners is a safe, simple and efficient technique, just as in heterosexual couples.</p>","PeriodicalId":520656,"journal":{"name":"JBRA assisted reproduction","volume":" ","pages":"47-55"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13055184/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBRA assisted reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20250155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: An increased risk of preeclampsia has been described when performing donor intrauterine insemination. One of the possible causes is immunological tolerance to semen. Both lesbian and single women, who have theoretically lower exposure to seminal fluid than heterosexual women requesting artificial insemination with donor, sperm should have a higher incidence of preeclampsia, although this fact has not been analyzed previously.

Methods: The population under study consisted of 439 gestations <24 weeks, achieved with artificial insemination with donor sperm, performed in two different populations: heterosexual couples and SLTG (single women, lesbian women, women with transgender partner). Preeclampsia rates and other perinatal outcomes were compared.

Results: No significant differences were found in the development of preeclampsia in the SLTG group 6.03% (12/199) vs. heterosexual patients 5.83% (14/240), p=0.93. In the SLTG group, compared with heterosexual group, age (36 vs. 35, p=0.002) and BMI (24.8 vs. 23.6, p=0.002) were somewhat higher. After adjusting for BMI, age and multiplicity of gestation, there were no significant differences in the risk of preeclampsia between SLTG group and heterosexual women. As expected, in women with preeclampsia, gestational ages and newborn weights (quantitative markers of preeclampsia severity) were significantly lower than in women without preeclampsia.

Conclusions: Our study suggests that neither sexual orientation nor previous sperm exposure carries a higher risk of preeclampsia, especially after correction for age and weight. Artificial insemination with donor sperm performed on single women, lesbians or women with transgender partners is a safe, simple and efficient technique, just as in heterosexual couples.

使用供体精子是否会增加子痫前期的风险,这取决于性行为?
目的:在进行供体宫内人工授精时,先兆子痫的风险增加。其中一个可能的原因是对精液的免疫耐受。从理论上讲,女同性恋和单身女性接触精液的几率比异性恋女性要低,因此她们的精子发生子痫前期的几率应该更高,尽管这一事实此前没有被分析过。结果:SLTG组子痫前期发生率为6.03%(12/199),异性恋组为5.83% (14/240),p=0.93。SLTG组与异性恋组相比,年龄(36比35,p=0.002)和BMI(24.8比23.6,p=0.002)稍高。在调整BMI、年龄和妊娠次数后,SLTG组和异性恋女性发生子痫前期的风险无显著差异。不出所料,在有子痫前期的妇女中,胎龄和新生儿体重(子痫前期严重程度的定量标记)明显低于没有子痫前期的妇女。结论:我们的研究表明,性取向和以前的精子接触都不会增加子痫前期的风险,尤其是在校正了年龄和体重之后。对单身女性、女同性恋或有变性伴侣的女性进行人工授精是一种安全、简单和有效的技术,就像对异性伴侣一样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书